Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me give you one possible scenario:
If you have 300k now and max your own contribution every year, and have an employer contribution of 25k. You 401k will become $1.6M in 10 years assuming 9% annual return (so you have to take the risk and invest aggressively).
WHAT EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTES 25K YEARLY
I get 30k per year from my employer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me give you one possible scenario:
If you have 300k now and max your own contribution every year, and have an employer contribution of 25k. You 401k will become $1.6M in 10 years assuming 9% annual return (so you have to take the risk and invest aggressively).
WHAT EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTES 25K YEARLY
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're asking about the 401k, but by 40 you should try backdoor contributions to a Roth IRA as well.
Odd advice without knowing income. Most Americans make below the Roth contribution phase out.
Strongly suggest looking up the details for “backdoor” Roth contributions.
You missed the point. The average American doesn't make enough money to have to use a backdoor to contribute to a Roth. Sorry you live in a UMC bubble.
No, you missed the point. Regardless of OP’s income, Roth IRA benefits are available to OP. And by 40, the advice is to look into taking advantage of that by contributing to a Roth IRA. Thats solid advice, and you’re focused on whether or not a backdoor is needed - who cares.
I don't think you understand how tight the average American's finances are. While I appreciate your mansplaining, you continue to miss the point.
Your virtue signaling is a waste of time, irrelevant to this discussion, and worst of all boring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're asking about the 401k, but by 40 you should try backdoor contributions to a Roth IRA as well.
Odd advice without knowing income. Most Americans make below the Roth contribution phase out.
Strongly suggest looking up the details for “backdoor” Roth contributions.
You missed the point. The average American doesn't make enough money to have to use a backdoor to contribute to a Roth. Sorry you live in a UMC bubble.
No, you missed the point. Regardless of OP’s income, Roth IRA benefits are available to OP. And by 40, the advice is to look into taking advantage of that by contributing to a Roth IRA. Thats solid advice, and you’re focused on whether or not a backdoor is needed - who cares.
I don't think you understand how tight the average American's finances are. While I appreciate your mansplaining, you continue to miss the point.
Anonymous wrote:Let me give you one possible scenario:
If you have 300k now and max your own contribution every year, and have an employer contribution of 25k. You 401k will become $1.6M in 10 years assuming 9% annual return (so you have to take the risk and invest aggressively).
Anonymous wrote:Millionaire next door says (age x annual income)/10. Ie: ($150,000x 40)/10 = $600,000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:43 and 460k. Feeling behind.
You are not behind
Anonymous wrote:43 and 460k. Feeling behind.
Anonymous wrote:300k and you're fine. Would more be better? Of course, but 300k is fine. Most Americans have much less.