Anonymous wrote:Has Trump offered his thoughts and prayers yet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coordinated by 2 suspects.
Any chance this was radical Islamic terrorism?
More chance that this was 2 street punks who have rap sheets and bad tempers.
People are reporting it was an argument between two people. So far, no indication that it was terrorism or pre planned.
And it didn’t happen at the parade; it happened near the parade route, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coordinated by 2 suspects.
Any chance this was radical Islamic terrorism?
More chance that this was 2 street punks who have rap sheets and bad tempers.
People are reporting it was an argument between two people. So far, no indication that it was terrorism or pre planned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coordinated by 2 suspects.
Any chance this was radical Islamic terrorism?
More chance that this was 2 street punks who have rap sheets and bad tempers.
Anonymous wrote:Coordinated by 2 suspects.
Any chance this was radical Islamic terrorism?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A little confused at why this is in the politics forum.
Because the solution to this problem is political. And the shooters were very likely ginned up by politicos and charlatans exercising rightwing conspiracy speech.
Or people could not shoot other people.
Nobody has to shoot up a crowd of innocent people. Individuals can choose to follow laws and not harm other people. That’s a great solution: don’t harm other people.
If wishes were horses beggars would ride.
So your position is that people are always going to harm/kill other people? Humans don’t have the capacity to stop themselves from shooting other innocent people?
I don’t shoot innocent people, do you?
I don’t have the slightest desire to shoot anyone.
Sure. What’s your solution for making sure people who DO want to shoot someone don’t get their hands on weapons?
We have many laws to prevent that; people don’t follow those laws.
What’s your solution to stop people who don’t follow our laws?
There are many more laws and actions that could stem the contagion. But then again, the GOP doesn't care about sch things on any level. They want the chaos, no matter the price.
If you break laws your guns get taken away and you can’t buy any new ones. Anyone who sells one toy gets prosecuted. Also certain types of ammo should be banned.
Anonymous wrote:My God when will this end people
Anonymous wrote:A little confused at why this is in the politics forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A little confused at why this is in the politics forum.
Because the solution to this problem is political. And the shooters were very likely ginned up by politicos and charlatans exercising rightwing conspiracy speech.
Or people could not shoot other people.
Nobody has to shoot up a crowd of innocent people. Individuals can choose to follow laws and not harm other people. That’s a great solution: don’t harm other people.
If wishes were horses beggars would ride.
So your position is that people are always going to harm/kill other people? Humans don’t have the capacity to stop themselves from shooting other innocent people?
I don’t shoot innocent people, do you?
I don’t have the slightest desire to shoot anyone.
Sure. What’s your solution for making sure people who DO want to shoot someone don’t get their hands on weapons?
We have many laws to prevent that; people don’t follow those laws.
What’s your solution to stop people who don’t follow our laws?
There are many more laws and actions that could stem the contagion. But then again, the GOP doesn't care about sch things on any level. They want the chaos, no matter the price.