Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'0" and I won't date guys over 6'. Money is good though.
Anonymous wrote:Men can rarely be too tall or too rich in my experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Men can rarely be too tall or too rich in my experience.
I dated a guy who was 6’3” and it was too tall. We didn’t line up. I had to stand on a stair to kiss him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m 6’1 and honestly I don’t understand women’s obsession with height. My friends who are less than 6’0 are perfectly fine. Maybe women can tell us why they obsess about height. I’ll clarify though some women not all women.
Why do you men obsess about body size? Same thing.
Most men don’t. Just look at the size of the women that the “hottest” guys are dating. The average woman that these guys are dating are not “thin”.
Anonymous wrote:Do you think women care about height and money more than men? I have heard women proudly and openly say a want a man at least 6’0 and who makes at least 100k (I am being generous here more like $180k to be honest). Why do women care so much more about height and money compared to men?
Anonymous wrote:Women can be very harsh when it comes to judging other people esp other women. You won’t hear a guy say hey Jenny is dating Mike and Mike is so fat. But boy if Jenny was fat Mike’s female friend would be the first one to point out Jenny’s weight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is a teen thing, early 20s max and a passing trend. Who else would be impressed by either of those metrics.
Are you kidding? In my teens, I did not care about money or height. I mean no one wants a complete broke guy but I didn’t care about how much money the guy had. It was his family’s money and I wasn’t looking for marriage or stability as a teen. Ironically a broke guy who lived in a tiny apartment broke my heart and I broke the heart of a guy whose parents were extremely rich who lived in a mansion with servant quarters. The poor guy was average height and the rich guy was tall, 6’3”.
As you get older, you may think about having a family and if the guy can provide you with a nice home. 180k is rock bottom of even affording to buy a home at all. If you want a decent lifestyle, I would say minimum 300k, more like 500k, definitely not the 100k in the OP.
This. Money is way more important than height.
I am not so sure about the money. I am 5'10" and I was a "broke" musician when I met my wife. She is 5'8", who graduated from Ivy and works for Blackstone, with a trust fund on top of that. She told me that she was attracted to me because she found me to be, in her own words, "captivating", with "gravitas", and I am good-looking. She does not care if I am broke. My wife told me that I am much more interesting than all of her wealthy co-workers and that she won a lifetime lottery when she married me. I am a SAHM and I do nothing but taking our kids to school, go to the gym, pickup kids after school, teach my kids music, groceries shopping, etc... Women still hit me up from time to time at Whole Food. Women with money don't look for guys with money, they look for good-looking dudes who are captivating. YMMV.
dp.. she doesn't care if you're broke because she has her own money and comes from money, so that doesn't really count since the vast majority of women aren't in her position.
Women hit on you because you are good looking. They are looking for fun, not a partner to raise their children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is a teen thing, early 20s max and a passing trend. Who else would be impressed by either of those metrics.
Are you kidding? In my teens, I did not care about money or height. I mean no one wants a complete broke guy but I didn’t care about how much money the guy had. It was his family’s money and I wasn’t looking for marriage or stability as a teen. Ironically a broke guy who lived in a tiny apartment broke my heart and I broke the heart of a guy whose parents were extremely rich who lived in a mansion with servant quarters. The poor guy was average height and the rich guy was tall, 6’3”.
As you get older, you may think about having a family and if the guy can provide you with a nice home. 180k is rock bottom of even affording to buy a home at all. If you want a decent lifestyle, I would say minimum 300k, more like 500k, definitely not the 100k in the OP.
This. Money is way more important than height.
I am not so sure about the money. I am 5'10" and I was a "broke" musician when I met my wife. She is 5'8", who graduated from Ivy and works for Blackstone, with a trust fund on top of that. She told me that she was attracted to me because she found me to be, in her own words, "captivating", with "gravitas", and I am good-looking. She does not care if I am broke. My wife told me that I am much more interesting than all of her wealthy co-workers and that she won a lifetime lottery when she married me. I am a SAHM and I do nothing but taking our kids to school, go to the gym, pickup kids after school, teach my kids music, groceries shopping, etc... Women still hit me up from time to time at Whole Food. Women with money don't look for guys with money, they look for good-looking dudes who are captivating. YMMV.
Very good points. Most men are boring (me included) and the men with interesting things (such as musical talent) about them will always get ahead of the line.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Men can rarely be too tall or too rich in my experience.
I dated a guy who was 6’3” and it was too tall. We didn’t line up. I had to stand on a stair to kiss him.