Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a teacher I also wonder if the kid is doing something like dropping a completed essay into the google doc, or sharing it as a viewer, or not submitting it to whatever plagiarism/AI detector the school uses.
I’m the teacher who posted above, checking into see if OP updated. I suspect this is what happened. The OP’s son didn’t share correctly, either on purpose or accidentally. Either way, I would do the same thing as the teacher in OP’s post: the assignment isn’t turned in until I can see its originality.
I doubt the school is protecting the teacher, as OP states. The school simply agrees with the teacher because this is standard practice.
Anonymous wrote:Trust me, I feel dramatic. This is a ridiculous situation and I’ve never experienced anything like this before. First, kid made an appt to see teacher during free period. I try really hard not to get involved. When that didn’t work, we tried the IT solution. We tried a nice email. The reality is that the teacher is getting and seeing the documents - and grading them (but telling us they are late). This makes no sense at all.
Anonymous wrote:Any chance this is happening at Deal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if OP is overreacting and her DC is not exactly following procedures.....this seems like the time for the teacher to set up a meeting to help both child and parent understand what the missing link is. This will make kid accountable to parent and parent will see that the teacher has outlined everything to both parent/kid.
Yes a meeting makes sense but changing the grade doesn’t.
Where do I say anything about grade changing? I am saying it's time for everyone to sit down together so that the teacher can communicate clearly to the child - and the parent - on what is missing. If the kid is trying to pull one over on the parent - then the parent will finally see this. And if the teacher hasn't communicated effectively to the kid - they will now have done so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if OP is overreacting and her DC is not exactly following procedures.....this seems like the time for the teacher to set up a meeting to help both child and parent understand what the missing link is. This will make kid accountable to parent and parent will see that the teacher has outlined everything to both parent/kid.
Are you using not following procedures as a euphemism for cheating, or do you not understand what we teachers are saying is likely going on?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if OP is overreacting and her DC is not exactly following procedures.....this seems like the time for the teacher to set up a meeting to help both child and parent understand what the missing link is. This will make kid accountable to parent and parent will see that the teacher has outlined everything to both parent/kid.
Yes a meeting makes sense but changing the grade doesn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The teacher sounds like a bully. I would ask for an in-person meeting and be ready to discuss specific assignments with notes, screenshots, etc so that she knows I’m involved and watching/documenting.
+1
I am really sorry OP. We went through this a couple years ago with an unstable, immature teacher like this and it was hell. The school also backed her up without looking into it. We did give up, but this was not HS so the grades did not really count as DD's other grades were good enough that it did not impact outplacement. I do think these things come around so your child's teacher bully will see consequences just maybe not while your child is a student there.
Anonymous wrote:Ask for an in person meeting . Bring child’s laptop so you can show what you’re looking at and discuss the discrepancy.
If that doesn’t work and you still think you’re right request a meeting with Principal or HOS.
Anonymous wrote:The teacher sounds like a bully. I would ask for an in-person meeting and be ready to discuss specific assignments with notes, screenshots, etc so that she knows I’m involved and watching/documenting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if OP is overreacting and her DC is not exactly following procedures.....this seems like the time for the teacher to set up a meeting to help both child and parent understand what the missing link is. This will make kid accountable to parent and parent will see that the teacher has outlined everything to both parent/kid.
Are you using not following procedures as a euphemism for cheating, or do you not understand what we teachers are saying is likely going on?
Are you concluding, based on extremely limited information, that a student you do not know is a cheater?
Agree an in-person meeting with OP, student, teacher and an admin is needed to clear this up. OP, stop trying to do this via email and make time for the meeting.
I am saying the student is likely not following procedures that are there for a good reason.
PP seems to think that it’s likely a misunderstanding. I am saying that OP needs to go into the meeting understanding that it might not be.
No, you said the student is probably cheating and the PP is just not getting it.
I’m one of the teachers on this thread (but not the one you are responding to). It is the likely cause of this situation, to be honest. It’s the clearest way to make sense of OP’s post. Which is more likely? That the teacher defiantly isn’t grading something, even though time stamps would show when it was submitted proving the teacher is lying? Or that the student didn’t submit properly in an effort to mask the version history?
Or maybe the student isn’t submitting properly because they don’t understand some minutiae in the procedure rather than willfully trying to cheat. You don’t know this kid or the specifics of any of this. There are three possibilities, not one.
It’s 3rd quarter. I suspect students know how to submit docs by now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if OP is overreacting and her DC is not exactly following procedures.....this seems like the time for the teacher to set up a meeting to help both child and parent understand what the missing link is. This will make kid accountable to parent and parent will see that the teacher has outlined everything to both parent/kid.
Are you using not following procedures as a euphemism for cheating, or do you not understand what we teachers are saying is likely going on?
Are you concluding, based on extremely limited information, that a student you do not know is a cheater?
Agree an in-person meeting with OP, student, teacher and an admin is needed to clear this up. OP, stop trying to do this via email and make time for the meeting.
I am saying the student is likely not following procedures that are there for a good reason.
PP seems to think that it’s likely a misunderstanding. I am saying that OP needs to go into the meeting understanding that it might not be.
No, you said the student is probably cheating and the PP is just not getting it.
I’m one of the teachers on this thread (but not the one you are responding to). It is the likely cause of this situation, to be honest. It’s the clearest way to make sense of OP’s post. Which is more likely? That the teacher defiantly isn’t grading something, even though time stamps would show when it was submitted proving the teacher is lying? Or that the student didn’t submit properly in an effort to mask the version history?
Or maybe the student isn’t submitting properly because they don’t understand some minutiae in the procedure rather than willfully trying to cheat. You don’t know this kid or the specifics of any of this. There are three possibilities, not one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if OP is overreacting and her DC is not exactly following procedures.....this seems like the time for the teacher to set up a meeting to help both child and parent understand what the missing link is. This will make kid accountable to parent and parent will see that the teacher has outlined everything to both parent/kid.
Are you using not following procedures as a euphemism for cheating, or do you not understand what we teachers are saying is likely going on?
Are you concluding, based on extremely limited information, that a student you do not know is a cheater?
Agree an in-person meeting with OP, student, teacher and an admin is needed to clear this up. OP, stop trying to do this via email and make time for the meeting.
I am saying the student is likely not following procedures that are there for a good reason.
PP seems to think that it’s likely a misunderstanding. I am saying that OP needs to go into the meeting understanding that it might not be.
No, you said the student is probably cheating and the PP is just not getting it.
I’m one of the teachers on this thread (but not the one you are responding to). It is the likely cause of this situation, to be honest. It’s the clearest way to make sense of OP’s post. Which is more likely? That the teacher defiantly isn’t grading something, even though time stamps would show when it was submitted proving the teacher is lying? Or that the student didn’t submit properly in an effort to mask the version history?
I am also a teacher. Once you have submitted a document on Google Classroom, you can't edit it unless you unsubmit and resubmit. So there is no way to submit a blank document and go back to change it without the teacher knowing it. There is no way to mask version history on GC. You also can't edit documents on Canvas after it's submitted. I don't know about other LMSs.
And yes, sometimes teachers lie. During COVID, my daughter's work was consistently marked as "missing" when it was clearly submitted on Google Classroom. I could see that the teacher never even opened the documents. I emailed the teacher to inquire, and then magically, a bunch of comments from the teacher were written on the documents. The teacher replied that the work wasn't actually missing, the problem was that my daughter hadn't revised the work and resumbitted. But of course, the commenting feature on Google Docs is date and timestamped, and her comments were all made AFTER I had emailed her. So we got on Zoom for a meeting, I pulled all the documents up to prove that what she was saying simply wasn't the truth. Her only explanation? "Well, I don't know why those dates are there, I made those comments weeks ago-- you should talk to IT because I don't know why it says that." I said "I don't need to talk to IT, because I can see with my own eyes." In my case, administration backed me up because there was irrefutable proof the teacher was simply trying to cover her own ***. Because I am also a teacher, I know how it works. But sometimes teachers count on the fact that parents don't understand the LMS.
Like I said, I am a teacher, I support teachers. But teachers should also be able to back up their grades with evidence. If they resist doing that, it's a red flag.