Anonymous wrote:It seems a one million dollar 401k was everyone’s goal.
But now with greater contribution limits and a bull market more people are hitting two million. And a rare lucky few even 5 million in their 401ks if they did the max and all growth stocks and older.
How did one million for a retirement goal in the 401k so quickly become a small amount?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because everything is so much more expensive now. For example, food price has doubled since the pandemic. Your one million dollar at retirement translates only to $40k per year, which isn't much as you can imagine.
Doubled? In 4 years? Definitely gone up a lot but let's not go crazy here. Got a gallon of milk yesterday for $3 and 12 eggs for $1.50.
And you need to hit a retirement calculator before you say $1 million is $40k/year. The money will grow, of course.
No, this is accurate. The rule is that you can withdraw 4% of principle. So that is 40K the first year. True hopefully a little more each year after, but not a lot. The best estimate on 1M is 40K per year for the first ten years of retirement.
You’d be crazy to use 4% rule if you don’t have pension. 3% max or lower.
Wait do you all think you are gonna live past 95?
Also I assume social security will not be as generous when I retire (probably around 20 years from now?), but it won't be zero.
You save because you can't tell the future. What an idiotic statement
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because everything is so much more expensive now. For example, food price has doubled since the pandemic. Your one million dollar at retirement translates only to $40k per year, which isn't much as you can imagine.
Doubled? In 4 years? Definitely gone up a lot but let's not go crazy here. Got a gallon of milk yesterday for $3 and 12 eggs for $1.50.
And you need to hit a retirement calculator before you say $1 million is $40k/year. The money will grow, of course.
Funny you only picked the cheapest milk and eggs. I know it has doubled for me because I rarely spent more than $100 each week at Costco before pandemic. Now I rarely spend less than $200 with the same type of stuff. For example, a pack of 40 bottles of water was $3 pre-pandemic and is now $7.39.
Why are you buying 40 bottles of water a month?
Because we have a family of four and don't drink tap water.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because everything is so much more expensive now. For example, food price has doubled since the pandemic. Your one million dollar at retirement translates only to $40k per year, which isn't much as you can imagine.
Doubled? In 4 years? Definitely gone up a lot but let's not go crazy here. Got a gallon of milk yesterday for $3 and 12 eggs for $1.50.
And you need to hit a retirement calculator before you say $1 million is $40k/year. The money will grow, of course.
Funny you only picked the cheapest milk and eggs. I know it has doubled for me because I rarely spent more than $100 each week at Costco before pandemic. Now I rarely spend less than $200 with the same type of stuff. For example, a pack of 40 bottles of water was $3 pre-pandemic and is now $7.39.
Why are you buying 40 bottles of water a month?
Because we have a family of four and don't drink tap water.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because everything is so much more expensive now. For example, food price has doubled since the pandemic. Your one million dollar at retirement translates only to $40k per year, which isn't much as you can imagine.
Doubled? In 4 years? Definitely gone up a lot but let's not go crazy here. Got a gallon of milk yesterday for $3 and 12 eggs for $1.50.
And you need to hit a retirement calculator before you say $1 million is $40k/year. The money will grow, of course.
Funny you only picked the cheapest milk and eggs. I know it has doubled for me because I rarely spent more than $100 each week at Costco before pandemic. Now I rarely spend less than $200 with the same type of stuff. For example, a pack of 40 bottles of water was $3 pre-pandemic and is now $7.39.
Why are you buying 40 bottles of water a month?
Because we have a family of four and don't drink tap water.
That's stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because everything is so much more expensive now. For example, food price has doubled since the pandemic. Your one million dollar at retirement translates only to $40k per year, which isn't much as you can imagine.
Doubled? In 4 years? Definitely gone up a lot but let's not go crazy here. Got a gallon of milk yesterday for $3 and 12 eggs for $1.50.
And you need to hit a retirement calculator before you say $1 million is $40k/year. The money will grow, of course.
Funny you only picked the cheapest milk and eggs. I know it has doubled for me because I rarely spent more than $100 each week at Costco before pandemic. Now I rarely spend less than $200 with the same type of stuff. For example, a pack of 40 bottles of water was $3 pre-pandemic and is now $7.39.
Why are you buying 40 bottles of water a month?
Because we have a family of four and don't drink tap water.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone found a calculator online that allows you to play around with different scenarios both in terms of investment growth/performance over a time period and then stage in withdrawals to weigh resulting RMDs/tax implications, considering that you may have available the 401k and regular brokerage to fund retirement prior to RMDs kick in?
Cfiresim is my favorite calculator.
Firecalc is similar— not quite as easy to use but might be worth checking if cfiresim doesn’t have the capabilities you are looking for.
Or if you really want to dig in you could look at pralana— they have both a free and paid version.
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone found a calculator online that allows you to play around with different scenarios both in terms of investment growth/performance over a time period and then stage in withdrawals to weigh resulting RMDs/tax implications, considering that you may have available the 401k and regular brokerage to fund retirement prior to RMDs kick in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because everything is so much more expensive now. For example, food price has doubled since the pandemic. Your one million dollar at retirement translates only to $40k per year, which isn't much as you can imagine.
Doubled? In 4 years? Definitely gone up a lot but let's not go crazy here. Got a gallon of milk yesterday for $3 and 12 eggs for $1.50.
And you need to hit a retirement calculator before you say $1 million is $40k/year. The money will grow, of course.
Funny you only picked the cheapest milk and eggs. I know it has doubled for me because I rarely spent more than $100 each week at Costco before pandemic. Now I rarely spend less than $200 with the same type of stuff. For example, a pack of 40 bottles of water was $3 pre-pandemic and is now $7.39.
Why are you buying 40 bottles of water a month?
Because we have a family of four and don't drink tap water.
Unless you live in Flint or someplace, bottled water is worse for you than tap water— it’s just tap water with microplastics.
Also the 4% rule is conservative— it was based on the worst markets ever. And it allows for annual increases with inflation so you don’t need to keep it flat for 10 years. Bogleheads have been tracking a mythical retirement of someone who started drawing down funds in the 2000 recession/crash and it’s worked out fine.
That's false too. 4% rule is there to minimize retirement income fluctuation and the risk of being wiped out. This is especially true if you only have one million dollars at the time of retirement.
Not sure what your point is here. Some people in the thread were suggesting the 4% rule is outdated and should be 3.5%, or should be 4% with no inflation adjustment and my point was it has been back tested thru some pretty bad market conditions (although IIRC the 4% assumes a decent chunk of bonds in retirement).
NP, but to assume going above 4% is okay because market conditions have somehow permanently changed is a good way to blow up your retirement account. Over any 20-30 year period, you are going to have some really bad markets not unlike ones in the past.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because everything is so much more expensive now. For example, food price has doubled since the pandemic. Your one million dollar at retirement translates only to $40k per year, which isn't much as you can imagine.
Doubled? In 4 years? Definitely gone up a lot but let's not go crazy here. Got a gallon of milk yesterday for $3 and 12 eggs for $1.50.
And you need to hit a retirement calculator before you say $1 million is $40k/year. The money will grow, of course.
Funny you only picked the cheapest milk and eggs. I know it has doubled for me because I rarely spent more than $100 each week at Costco before pandemic. Now I rarely spend less than $200 with the same type of stuff. For example, a pack of 40 bottles of water was $3 pre-pandemic and is now $7.39.
Why are you buying 40 bottles of water a month?
Because we have a family of four and don't drink tap water.
Unless you live in Flint or someplace, bottled water is worse for you than tap water— it’s just tap water with microplastics.
Also the 4% rule is conservative— it was based on the worst markets ever. And it allows for annual increases with inflation so you don’t need to keep it flat for 10 years. Bogleheads have been tracking a mythical retirement of someone who started drawing down funds in the 2000 recession/crash and it’s worked out fine.
That's false too. 4% rule is there to minimize retirement income fluctuation and the risk of being wiped out. This is especially true if you only have one million dollars at the time of retirement.
Not sure what your point is here. Some people in the thread were suggesting the 4% rule is outdated and should be 3.5%, or should be 4% with no inflation adjustment and my point was it has been back tested thru some pretty bad market conditions (although IIRC the 4% assumes a decent chunk of bonds in retirement).