Anonymous wrote:It's not OP's money. It belongs to her children. I don't understand all the pearl clutching.
Anonymous wrote:It's not OP's money. It belongs to her children. I don't understand all the pearl clutching.
Anonymous wrote:I meant +1
OP would have to lie and not disclose the trust to be able to continue to get the aid. It's asked about every year when re-applying.
Anonymous wrote:There is no way for the trust money to show up on your tax bill; it is separate from your net worth.
The trust management folks you spoke to are correct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA form will ask about this but if your kids don't have access to these funds before the age of 25 (did I read that right?!) then no, it should not count against FA. 1 million is not a lot of money, they need to invest those funds so they have a comfortable adulthood like OPs mom wanted for them.
It’s insane to me that a family who has $2M to be used for solely for education thinks they are still entitled to FA.
Exactly
Anonymous wrote:OP, talk to a professional. This is not the forum for sound advice who thinks nobody deserves FA and I mean nobody. I've seen posts on here from families who live in poverty looking for opportunity for their kids being told to attend public because no one gives that much FA and they wouldn't fit in with rich kids and people who are upper middle class who are told to attend public and people with over 200K HHI told to pay full.
Anonymous wrote:Hey I got news everyone - it's the professionals push that we should subsidize FA with the fund. Not us. That's why I'm asking!
Seriously - $1M is not a lot of money. If we tap it for 6 yrs of school + college, they have very little at age 25. The question is whether we should tap it for education at all given that we are receiving FA. The banks tell us we should most definitely protect the money as much as possible but still use it if it takes the pressure off us financially as there is actually a reason we receive FA. Even with FA, we struggle. It's not like we are millionaires. I like how you all think it's our money but it isn't. We would really like our kids to benefit as much as possible with it. However it's education and kinda the definition of benefit at this time. I think if any of of you were in this our position you would be wrestling with whether to use it on education or not, it's much easier to sit in judgement, I get that.
And to the idiot that wonders ow I know my kids are beneficiaries since I was estranged from my mom - hey Sherlock - as guardian of the beneficiaries, I'm legally bound to be told. You are a moron for even asking this question! We do have to find a 3rd party Trustee long-term once the estate is settled thus we are not in control of any of this money but hey, according to these "professionals," we should leverage the fund to our benefit as a family.
I will no longer be reviewing this thread as none of you have experience obviously.
Anonymous wrote:Hey I got news everyone - it's the professionals push that we should subsidize FA with the fund. Not us. That's why I'm asking!
Seriously - $1M is not a lot of money. If we tap it for 6 yrs of school + college, they have very little at age 25. The question is whether we should tap it for education at all given that we are receiving FA. The banks tell us we should most definitely protect the money as much as possible but still use it if it takes the pressure off us financially as there is actually a reason we receive FA. Even with FA, we struggle. It's not like we are millionaires. I like how you all think it's our money but it isn't. We would really like our kids to benefit as much as possible with it. However it's education and kinda the definition of benefit at this time. I think if any of of you were in this our position you would be wrestling with whether to use it on education or not, it's much easier to sit in judgement, I get that.
And to the idiot that wonders ow I know my kids are beneficiaries since I was estranged from my mom - hey Sherlock - as guardian of the beneficiaries, I'm legally bound to be told. You are a moron for even asking this question! We do have to find a 3rd party Trustee long-term once the estate is settled thus we are not in control of any of this money but hey, according to these "professionals," we should leverage the fund to our benefit as a family.
I will no longer be reviewing this thread as none of you have experience obviously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It’s insane to me that a family who has $2M to be used for solely for education thinks they are still entitled to FA.
Exactly