Anonymous wrote:A student journalist at Whitman reported on the school's move to adjust the 50 percent rule. Namely, stripping away the requirement of two-way communication before a zero can be assigned:
SOURCE: https://mocoshow.com/2024/01/29/change-to-50-percent-rule-marks-shift-in-mcps-grading-trends/
This marking period, Whitman administrators began to roll out through department meetings a revised, county-wide grading policy, including new guidance regarding the current “50 percent” rule. The new rule, to go into effect in the second semester in MCPS, allows teachers to give students zeros for missing work provided that they contact the student’s guardians. Previously, MCPS administrators expected teachers to participate in two-way communication before assigning a zero, meaning they had to contact the student’s guardian and receive a response.
The change shortens the steps between a student missing an assignment and their receiving a zero and may substantially change the culture surrounding the 50 percent rule. The English department was the first at Whitman to receive the new rule via a summary sheet at their department meeting on Dec. 18. Administrators across MCPS are now circulating similar guides as the second semester approaches. In addition to the zero rule change, the new grading policy includes a commitment to clear reassessment opportunities and consistent grading between different sections of a class.
Following the policy announcement, the Montgomery County Education Association entered into negotiations with MCPS to ensure that teachers would not be reprimanded for potentially violating a mid-year policy change. MCPS officials agreed to continue the rollout but with teacher “coaching” as the aim until the 2024-2025 school year, MCEA confirmed in an email to members. Then, compliance will be mandatory.
It's confusing since this is a student journalist report if this is systemwide, but given the MCEA confirmation, it seems like it is. But why isn't MCPS communicating about this change systemwide? This is the kind of information that should be in the Things to Know messages.
Teachers on DCUM: Are all MCPS high schools making this shift? If so, does it look differently at your school versus what's described at Whitman?
Anonymous wrote:Here's the policy MCPS should have:
Every missing assignment is referred to central office, who hires low paid admin assistants to chase down parents, including visiting homes. Heck, hire high school student interns to do it!
Let the professional teachers get back to work teaching, and the admins get started on work admining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Even within Blair, different departments are interpreting the rule differently."
https://silverchips.mbhs.edu/content/mcps-rolls-out-new-mid-year-regulations-allowing-zeros-to-return-to-gradebooks-36377/
*sigh*
This discretion that is afforded to different schools, let alone different departments in the same school, is one reason why MCPS is so dysfunctional and difficult for families to maneuver.
There isn't "discretion". The regulation was changed in the fall to roll in and codify some of the changes implemented during the pandemic, to go back to some previous procedures, and to remove all links between attendance and grades per state level direction. Schools were directed to communicate with their communities directly.
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ikara.pdf
In our HS there has been a little too much flexibility and different teachers implemented certain things differently. Now there are some particular things that will be consistent per the regulation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Even within Blair, different departments are interpreting the rule differently."
https://silverchips.mbhs.edu/content/mcps-rolls-out-new-mid-year-regulations-allowing-zeros-to-return-to-gradebooks-36377/
*sigh*
This discretion that is afforded to different schools, let alone different departments in the same school, is one reason why MCPS is so dysfunctional and difficult for families to maneuver.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Even within Blair, different departments are interpreting the rule differently."
https://silverchips.mbhs.edu/content/mcps-rolls-out-new-mid-year-regulations-allowing-zeros-to-return-to-gradebooks-36377/
*sigh*
This discretion that is afforded to different schools, let alone different departments in the same school, is one reason why MCPS is so dysfunctional and difficult for families to maneuver.
There isn't "discretion". The regulation was changed in the fall to roll in and codify some of the changes implemented during the pandemic, to go back to some previous procedures, and to remove all links between attendance and grades per state level direction. Schools were directed to communicate with their communities directly.
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ikara.pdf
In our HS there has been a little too much flexibility and different teachers implemented certain things differently. Now there are some particular things that will be consistent per the regulation.
What are those thiings?
And why let schools do this directly when it's a systemwide change and in an age where information flows freely and speedily, word will get out if one school publishes the news, as Whitman and Blair have, but others don't.
Why does MCPS suck at communications so bad? What is Chris Cram doing?
So whiny ...![]()
If different schools were operating with different policies, then they each need individual messaging to describe the shift to the new policy.
From RM's global announcement:
Due Date/Deadline/Cut off Policy:
By Due Date - Full Credit
By Deadline (-10%): After the due date, late work will receive a 10% penalty until the deadline.
** The change is that this must be applied consistently by all teachers.
After the deadline, but by Cutoff 1 (Interim)/By Cutoff 2 (End of Quarter) (50%)
After the deadline, students have until the cutoff date to turn in assignments. Zs will remain until the final day of the cutoff.
Cutoff 1 is at interims: Work from the first half of the marking period turned in after the deadline but before the interim can receive 50%.
Cutoff 2 is at the end of the marking period: Work from the second half of the marking period turned in after the deadline but before the end of the marking period can receive 50%.
Missing (0%)
After the cutoff, missing work will result in a zero. Zs will be converted to zeros."
** This must also be applied consistently.
This is too complicated. I try to do it myself, but it is a crazy amount of work once communication is added in. Teachers can’t enter Z’s and INC in MYMCPS. We have to manually overwrite the grades sent over to Synergy. It requires about a minute per individual assignment grade due delays in the system so most do it. I usually only do it on teacher grading days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Even within Blair, different departments are interpreting the rule differently."
https://silverchips.mbhs.edu/content/mcps-rolls-out-new-mid-year-regulations-allowing-zeros-to-return-to-gradebooks-36377/
*sigh*
This discretion that is afforded to different schools, let alone different departments in the same school, is one reason why MCPS is so dysfunctional and difficult for families to maneuver.
There isn't "discretion". The regulation was changed in the fall to roll in and codify some of the changes implemented during the pandemic, to go back to some previous procedures, and to remove all links between attendance and grades per state level direction. Schools were directed to communicate with their communities directly.
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ikara.pdf
In our HS there has been a little too much flexibility and different teachers implemented certain things differently. Now there are some particular things that will be consistent per the regulation.
What are those thiings?
And why let schools do this directly when it's a systemwide change and in an age where information flows freely and speedily, word will get out if one school publishes the news, as Whitman and Blair have, but others don't.
Why does MCPS suck at communications so bad? What is Chris Cram doing?
So whiny ...![]()
If different schools were operating with different policies, then they each need individual messaging to describe the shift to the new policy.
From RM's global announcement:
Due Date/Deadline/Cut off Policy:
By Due Date - Full Credit
By Deadline (-10%): After the due date, late work will receive a 10% penalty until the deadline.
** The change is that this must be applied consistently by all teachers.
After the deadline, but by Cutoff 1 (Interim)/By Cutoff 2 (End of Quarter) (50%)
After the deadline, students have until the cutoff date to turn in assignments. Zs will remain until the final day of the cutoff.
Cutoff 1 is at interims: Work from the first half of the marking period turned in after the deadline but before the interim can receive 50%.
Cutoff 2 is at the end of the marking period: Work from the second half of the marking period turned in after the deadline but before the end of the marking period can receive 50%.
Missing (0%)
After the cutoff, missing work will result in a zero. Zs will be converted to zeros."
** This must also be applied consistently.
Anonymous wrote:If your school isn’t following board policy then get your EFRs to address it at the triad meetings. If they still aren’t, I really don’t see why as a teacher you don’t follow it anyway. Union will back you if admin pushes back.
Anonymous wrote:"Even within Blair, different departments are interpreting the rule differently."
https://silverchips.mbhs.edu/content/mcps-rolls-out-new-mid-year-regulations-allowing-zeros-to-return-to-gradebooks-36377/