Anonymous wrote:Just because a certain school's report cards don't have "grades," doesn't mean they aren't useful or descriptive about where a student stands academically.
Anonymous wrote:Our starts in sixth. Before that, they get "meeting expectations" or "exhibiting strength" etc. we like the system. I don't see why they need grades earlier than that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? At two different schools, the report cards that our kids received containing no letter or numerical grades have usually been somewhere between 8 and 10 pages long, with so much detail about their performance across dozens of specific skills or standards related to study habits/behavior, reading, writing, math, and other subjects.
We get a way fuller picture than what a simple letter grade would convey. It's a ton of work for the teachers to prepare thoughtful narratives, and we really appreciate that they do.
It’s all just smoke up your ass to make you feel better writing that $45k check.
I trust the ERB report with IN norms more than some ten page report of platitudes any day.
Anonymous wrote:Why? At two different schools, the report cards that our kids received containing no letter or numerical grades have usually been somewhere between 8 and 10 pages long, with so much detail about their performance across dozens of specific skills or standards related to study habits/behavior, reading, writing, math, and other subjects.
We get a way fuller picture than what a simple letter grade would convey. It's a ton of work for the teachers to prepare thoughtful narratives, and we really appreciate that they do.
Anonymous wrote:
Our MoCo Catholic starts letter grades in 4th. The bands are also more restrictive/old school:
A - 93-100%
B - 85-92%
C - 77-84%
D - 70-76%
F - Below 70%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? At two different schools, the report cards that our kids received containing no letter or numerical grades have usually been somewhere between 8 and 10 pages long, with so much detail about their performance across dozens of specific skills or standards related to study habits/behavior, reading, writing, math, and other subjects.
We get a way fuller picture than what a simple letter grade would convey. It's a ton of work for the teachers to prepare thoughtful narratives, and we really appreciate that they do.
It’s all just smoke up your ass to make you feel better writing that $45k check.
I trust the ERB report with IN norms more than some ten page report of platitudes any day.
Anonymous wrote:Exceeds expectations = A
Meets expectations = B
With Support = C
Does not meet = D
It's not hard to translate the 1-4s to letters if it matters to you.
A lot of the K-8s start in 6th because high schools look at grades and 7th & 8th, so you essentially get a practice year and then it counts.
Anonymous wrote:I think our k-8 started with formal grades on report cards in 5th grade.
However, I believe they started giving grades on assignments in 4th grade. The report card was still all narrative and they didn't accumulate grades over assignments during the quarter/semester - but they would start to see how points were being assigned to how well they did on the assigned material.
Anonymous wrote:Why? At two different schools, the report cards that our kids received containing no letter or numerical grades have usually been somewhere between 8 and 10 pages long, with so much detail about their performance across dozens of specific skills or standards related to study habits/behavior, reading, writing, math, and other subjects.
We get a way fuller picture than what a simple letter grade would convey. It's a ton of work for the teachers to prepare thoughtful narratives, and we really appreciate that they do.
Anonymous wrote:No grades ever. Too elitist and racist.