Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is that where this rumor is coming from.
That’s nuts.

This rumor has been swirling in RWNJ media for years and some posters mention it here occasionally. Pollsters even keep throwing her name on lists of possible Democrats for 2028 etc. It’s so dumb, she didn’t even want to be FLOTUS and would never want to be POTUS.

+1. It’s just RW BS designed yo rile up the RW crazies in case the remaining BS Trump is running on is not enough. Hey, they bought the pizzagate, so at this point having MO take Biden’s place and maybe having Malia already locked up for secretary of state would be totally believable for that crowd. They have to keep them white hot angry until November 2024

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

How do you figure? Please, be specific.

Amazing? She’s an Ivy-league educated lawyer and best selling author with a solid professional background, excellent business acumen, who has a global profile and connects well with people from every walk of life. She manages to befriend George H.W Bush, who I am old enough to remember as the pre-Trump boogeyman of the right.

As for the country, she would be the first president who ever went through infertility treatment.

She would be the first President who experienced our maternal health care system as a black woman at a time when we’re all focused on the maternal mortality rate (we are all focused on that right?!)

She would be the first President who took a step backward in their career to support a spouse.

The first President who was primarily responsible for her children’s education and healthcare.

In other words she would bring a perspective to the White House that it has literally never seen before. I have the feeling she wouldn’t have sold out nurses and childcare workers as fast as Biden did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

How do you figure? Please, be specific.

Amazing? She’s an Ivy-league educated lawyer and best selling author with a solid professional background, excellent business acumen, who has a global profile and connects well with people from every walk of life. She manages to befriend George H.W Bush, who I am old enough to remember as the pre-Trump boogeyman of the right.

As for the country, she would be the first president who ever went through infertility treatment.

She would be the first President who experienced our maternal health care system as a black woman at a time when we’re all focused on the maternal mortality rate (we are all focused on that right?!)

She would be the first President who took a step backward in their career to support a spouse.

The first President who was primarily responsible for her children’s education and healthcare.

In other words she would bring a perspective to the White House that it has literally never seen before. I have the feeling she wouldn’t have sold out nurses and childcare workers as fast as Biden did.

In some ways, she’s a better candidate than Hillary was. But at least Hilary had elected federal official experience. I just don’t think Michelle’s heart is in holding office.

In some ways a better candidate than 2016 70 year old Hillary but 2008 Hillary was a one of the most qualified and fit for office candidate we've seen in recent history. Michelle is brilliant and likable but first lady for 8 years doesn't amount to a presidential resume.

The country elected Donald Trump in 2020. I do not want to hear a single word about “presidential resume”

The country didn't elect Trump in 2020. Get over it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

How do you figure? Please, be specific.

Amazing? She’s an Ivy-league educated lawyer and best selling author with a solid professional background, excellent business acumen, who has a global profile and connects well with people from every walk of life. She manages to befriend George H.W Bush, who I am old enough to remember as the pre-Trump boogeyman of the right.

As for the country, she would be the first president who ever went through infertility treatment.

She would be the first President who experienced our maternal health care system as a black woman at a time when we’re all focused on the maternal mortality rate (we are all focused on that right?!)

She would be the first President who took a step backward in their career to support a spouse.

The first President who was primarily responsible for her children’s education and healthcare.

In other words she would bring a perspective to the White House that it has literally never seen before. I have the feeling she wouldn’t have sold out nurses and childcare workers as fast as Biden did.

In some ways, she’s a better candidate than Hillary was. But at least Hilary had elected federal official experience. I just don’t think Michelle’s heart is in holding office.

In some ways a better candidate than 2016 70 year old Hillary but 2008 Hillary was a one of the most qualified and fit for office candidate we've seen in recent history. Michelle is brilliant and likable but first lady for 8 years doesn't amount to a presidential resume.

The country elected Donald Trump in 2020. I do not want to hear a single word about “presidential resume”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

How do you figure? Please, be specific.

Amazing? She’s an Ivy-league educated lawyer and best selling author with a solid professional background, excellent business acumen, who has a global profile and connects well with people from every walk of life. She manages to befriend George H.W Bush, who I am old enough to remember as the pre-Trump boogeyman of the right.

As for the country, she would be the first president who ever went through infertility treatment.

She would be the first President who experienced our maternal health care system as a black woman at a time when we’re all focused on the maternal mortality rate (we are all focused on that right?!)

She would be the first President who took a step backward in their career to support a spouse.

The first President who was primarily responsible for her children’s education and healthcare.

In other words she would bring a perspective to the White House that it has literally never seen before. I have the feeling she wouldn’t have sold out nurses and childcare workers as fast as Biden did.

In some ways, she’s a better candidate than Hillary was. But at least Hilary had elected federal official experience. I just don’t think Michelle’s heart is in holding office.

In some ways a better candidate than 2016 70 year old Hillary but 2008 Hillary was a one of the most qualified and fit for office candidate we've seen in recent history. Michelle is brilliant and likable but first lady for 8 years doesn't amount to a presidential resume.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

How do you figure? Please, be specific.

Amazing? She’s an Ivy-league educated lawyer and best selling author with a solid professional background, excellent business acumen, who has a global profile and connects well with people from every walk of life. She manages to befriend George H.W Bush, who I am old enough to remember as the pre-Trump boogeyman of the right.

As for the country, she would be the first president who ever went through infertility treatment.

She would be the first President who experienced our maternal health care system as a black woman at a time when we’re all focused on the maternal mortality rate (we are all focused on that right?!)

She would be the first President who took a step backward in their career to support a spouse.

The first President who was primarily responsible for her children’s education and healthcare.

In other words she would bring a perspective to the White House that it has literally never seen before. I have the feeling she wouldn’t have sold out nurses and childcare workers as fast as Biden did.

In some ways, she’s a better candidate than Hillary was. But at least Hilary had elected federal official experience. I just don’t think Michelle’s heart is in holding office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

How do you figure? Please, be specific.

Amazing? She’s an Ivy-league educated lawyer and best selling author with a solid professional background, excellent business acumen, who has a global profile and connects well with people from every walk of life. She manages to befriend George H.W Bush, who I am old enough to remember as the pre-Trump boogeyman of the right.

As for the country, she would be the first president who ever went through infertility treatment.

She would be the first President who experienced our maternal health care system as a black woman at a time when we’re all focused on the maternal mortality rate (we are all focused on that right?!)

She would be the first President who took a step backward in their career to support a spouse.

The first President who was primarily responsible for her children’s education and healthcare.

In other words she would bring a perspective to the White House that it has literally never seen before. I have the feeling she wouldn’t have sold out nurses and childcare workers as fast as Biden did.

In some ways, she’s a better candidate than Hillary was. But at least Hilary had elected federal official experience. I just don’t think Michelle’s heart is in holding office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

How do you figure? Please, be specific.

Amazing? She’s an Ivy-league educated lawyer and best selling author with a solid professional background, excellent business acumen, who has a global profile and connects well with people from every walk of life. She manages to befriend George H.W Bush, who I am old enough to remember as the pre-Trump boogeyman of the right.

As for the country, she would be the first president who ever went through infertility treatment.

She would be the first President who experienced our maternal health care system as a black woman at a time when we’re all focused on the maternal mortality rate (we are all focused on that right?!)

She would be the first President who took a step backward in their career to support a spouse.

The first President who was primarily responsible for her children’s education and healthcare.

In other words she would bring a perspective to the White House that it has literally never seen before. I have the feeling she wouldn’t have sold out nurses and childcare workers as fast as Biden did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is that where this rumor is coming from.
That’s nuts.

This rumor has been swirling in RWNJ media for years and some posters mention it here occasionally. Pollsters even keep throwing her name on lists of possible Democrats for 2028 etc. It’s so dumb, she didn’t even want to be FLOTUS and would never want to be POTUS.

Anonymous wrote:It’s the only hope we have.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

How do you figure? Please, be specific.

Anonymous wrote:It’s…the New York Post.

It would be amazing but she doesn’t want it. She’s said she doesn’t want it.

It would be good for the country but that isn’t how these things work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is that where this rumor is coming from.
That’s nuts.

This rumor has been swirling in RWNJ media for years and some posters mention it here occasionally. Pollsters even keep throwing her name on lists of possible Democrats for 2028 etc. It’s so dumb, she didn’t even want to be FLOTUS and would never want to be POTUS.

You mean LWNJ media. Those are the only people who inexplicably obsess over Michelle Obama.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is that where this rumor is coming from.
That’s nuts.

This rumor has been swirling in RWNJ media for years and some posters mention it here occasionally. Pollsters even keep throwing her name on lists of possible Democrats for 2028 etc. It’s so dumb, she didn’t even want to be FLOTUS and would never want to be POTUS.

Anonymous wrote:Is that where this rumor is coming from.
That’s nuts.