Anonymous wrote:She is famous. She's extremely attractive relative to me, a dumpy 47 year old woman. I don't find her extremely attractive relative to my teenage son's female friends - not that she isn't pretty, she's just pretty in a normal person vs. movie star way.

Well, they're teenagers, and she's a nearly 30 year old woman.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any other celeb out right now that has that classic American look and vibe?

I only know her from Anyone But You, which I was surprised how much I liked. I laughed out loud, multiple times (though there was also some cringe moments, and absurdities but whatever . . . . )

She's tiny with big boobs. I didn't actually find her that pretty (though she's younger and prettier than I am, but I'm not in Hollywood). She's kind of the basic, blond, 1970's Farrah pretty. For me, that's not my standard for beautiful. More importantly, I didn't think her acting was great. But maybe it was the rom-com role. I haven't seen her in anything else.

Farrah was iconic - it’s why you know her by her first name only even after she died

But that’s the point

While Farrah is hotter than Sydney, I’m surprised she’s not this generations Farrah.

I’m a generation after Farrah fawcett’s prime and I still know her

You are probably right that SS acting talent is horrible

To be fair, we also know her by her first name because there are very few other Farrahs. If Michael Jackson's name had been Perceval, we would all know him as Perceval. Since his name was Michael, we need the last name to distinguish him from the million other Michaels in the entertainment industry. It doesn't make him less iconic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any other celeb out right now that has that classic American look and vibe?

I only know her from Anyone But You, which I was surprised how much I liked. I laughed out loud, multiple times (though there was also some cringe moments, and absurdities but whatever . . . . )

She's tiny with big boobs. I didn't actually find her that pretty (though she's younger and prettier than I am, but I'm not in Hollywood). She's kind of the basic, blond, 1970's Farrah pretty. For me, that's not my standard for beautiful. More importantly, I didn't think her acting was great. But maybe it was the rom-com role. I haven't seen her in anything else.

Farrah was iconic - it’s why you know her by her first name only even after she died

But that’s the point

While Farrah is hotter than Sydney, I’m surprised she’s not this generations Farrah.

I’m a generation after Farrah fawcett’s prime and I still know her

You are probably right that SS acting talent is horrible

Sarah was iconic for being what was allowed to be iconic at the time. There was not a lot of representation in the 70s. And in any event, I never thought she was that pretty, tbh, though I am in a minority.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any other celeb out right now that has that classic American look and vibe?

I only know her from Anyone But You, which I was surprised how much I liked. I laughed out loud, multiple times (though there was also some cringe moments, and absurdities but whatever . . . . )

She's tiny with big boobs. I didn't actually find her that pretty (though she's younger and prettier than I am, but I'm not in Hollywood). She's kind of the basic, blond, 1970's Farrah pretty. For me, that's not my standard for beautiful. More importantly, I didn't think her acting was great. But maybe it was the rom-com role. I haven't seen her in anything else.

Farrah was iconic - it’s why you know her by her first name only even after she died

But that’s the point

While Farrah is hotter than Sydney, I’m surprised she’s not this generations Farrah.

I’m a generation after Farrah fawcett’s prime and I still know her

You are probably right that SS acting talent is horrible

Sydney is sexy but lacks Farrah's warmth, charm, and femininity. That dilutes her sex appeal.

Doesn't have the same charisma either. Farrah had that "it" factor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any other celeb out right now that has that classic American look and vibe?

I only know her from Anyone But You, which I was surprised how much I liked. I laughed out loud, multiple times (though there was also some cringe moments, and absurdities but whatever . . . . )

She's tiny with big boobs. I didn't actually find her that pretty (though she's younger and prettier than I am, but I'm not in Hollywood). She's kind of the basic, blond, 1970's Farrah pretty. For me, that's not my standard for beautiful. More importantly, I didn't think her acting was great. But maybe it was the rom-com role. I haven't seen her in anything else.

Farrah was iconic - it’s why you know her by her first name only even after she died

But that’s the point

While Farrah is hotter than Sydney, I’m surprised she’s not this generations Farrah.

I’m a generation after Farrah fawcett’s prime and I still know her

You are probably right that SS acting talent is horrible

Sydney is sexy but lacks Farrah's warmth, charm, and femininity. That dilutes her sex appeal.

Anonymous wrote:I think she’s pretty famous. I haven’t seen the new movie but I know her from Euphoria, Handmaids tale , and the white lotus. I think she’s been nominated for Emmys a couple times.

TV actors are not, by definition, “famous.” Especially given the dilution of programming.

She has nice, full, round tits. That is about it.

I think she’s pretty famous. I haven’t seen the new movie but I know her from Euphoria, Handmaids tale , and the white lotus. I think she’s been nominated for Emmys a couple times.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any other celeb out right now that has that classic American look and vibe?

I only know her from Anyone But You, which I was surprised how much I liked. I laughed out loud, multiple times (though there was also some cringe moments, and absurdities but whatever . . . . )

She's tiny with big boobs. I didn't actually find her that pretty (though she's younger and prettier than I am, but I'm not in Hollywood). She's kind of the basic, blond, 1970's Farrah pretty. For me, that's not my standard for beautiful. More importantly, I didn't think her acting was great. But maybe it was the rom-com role. I haven't seen her in anything else.

Farrah was iconic - it’s why you know her by her first name only even after she died

But that’s the point

While Farrah is hotter than Sydney, I’m surprised she’s not this generations Farrah.

I’m a generation after Farrah fawcett’s prime and I still know her

You are probably right that SS acting talent is horrible

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not particularly attractive or remarkable, and she looks older than she is…like she just always looks tired. She’s basically what Billie Eilish will look like at 40

Most men would disagree with the attractive part

She’s hot for someone you would know irl, but she’s not movie star hot. I’m genuinely surprised she got the lead in something that was shown in theaters

I can't think of another actress who looks better with her top off. It's like they took the perfect set of boobs and put her on the girl next door. To me, that's shallow perfection.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not particularly attractive or remarkable, and she looks older than she is…like she just always looks tired. She’s basically what Billie Eilish will look like at 40

Most men would disagree with the attractive part

She’s hot for someone you would know irl, but she’s not movie star hot. I’m genuinely surprised she got the lead in something that was shown in theaters

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any other celeb out right now that has that classic American look and vibe?

This weird booster crap again? Ugh, just stop.

Yep, you nailed it. Another PR-type post. The gushy language is always the giveaway, and the attitude that the "celeb" is somehow classic, iconic, etc.

Really wish there were a way for Jeff to flag and ax these posts. I suspect they're created by bots, which drop them into any chat board anywhere with "entertainment" in its title or focus. The fact that they're always about "celebs" who need a boost or need re-boosting after the media's grown tired of them is so obvious, too. Harry and Meghan, assorted Kardashians, the Hadid model, etc.

Anonymous wrote:She’s not particularly attractive or remarkable, and she looks older than she is…like she just always looks tired. She’s basically what Billie Eilish will look like at 40

Most men would disagree with the attractive part

Anonymous wrote:Because she took on trashy roles and her boobs are too out there. It has resulted in her being put in the trashy category as opposed to being considered a serious actress with talent.

I think trashy is a bit strong but overall the gist of this is right, I think. There're a grillion new beautiful young blonde actresses every year. To make herself stand out (and take advantage of a standout asset) she has been topless a lot, but that means that's what people think of when they think of her. I've seen her in a bunch of stuff and I think she's a decently good actress but without the boobs she wouldn't be as booked as she is. It's a weird Catch-22 where the boobs often get her the roles but then nobody respects her for having her boobs on screen all the time, even though everyone wants to see them.

She’s not particularly attractive or remarkable, and she looks older than she is…like she just always looks tired. She’s basically what Billie Eilish will look like at 40

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is famous. She's extremely attractive relative to me, a dumpy 47 year old woman. I don't find her extremely attractive relative to my teenage son's female friends - not that she isn't pretty, she's just pretty in a normal person vs. movie star way.

It's her boobs.

-56 yo dumpy married man

Agree. In Anyone But You, they took up half the screen in every scene she was in. I remember commenting about it while watching. If you have to do that, your acting isn't that great.