Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Dr. Ishii called women 'stupid,' referring to them as 'doing much worse research work as men engineers' and 'using the stupid U.S. legal system to get faculty positions they do not deserve.'"
---
It's more than possible that the Plaintiff didn't deserve tenure *and* Dr. Ishii needs to be removed yesterday.
Yes, both things could certainly be true.
Even if you believe that you're stupid for repeating that often in the work place. Dr Ishii is about to find out.
It's all just allegations at this point. It's nearly impossible to defeat a summary judgment as long as you have a he said she said scenario. The plaintiff already lost as to Purdue and one prof already. Doesn't look right at this point if the plaintiff already lost summary judgment in part.
His reputation is damaged now. That’s good enough.
Anonymous wrote:There are things white people are great at
In the 21st century, stem production at an economical level is not one of these things
Asians are way more interested, able and willing to take grad school wages to produce good work
This is why the CHIPS act will fail
Same thing happened - tsmc was not happy with the quality of the workers in arizona so wanted to bring over workers from Taiwan on expedited visas but tsmc is being held up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is terrible but honestly…aren’t Asians as a general matter harder working than white people? Specifically people in the US with Asian ancestry, especially if they have parents who sacrificed a ton for them to have a better life in the US. This is the racist version of not hiring millennials.
In any event, as a general matter, it's looking like Asians are more racist than white people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Dr. Ishii called women 'stupid,' referring to them as 'doing much worse research work as men engineers' and 'using the stupid U.S. legal system to get faculty positions they do not deserve.'"
---
It's more than possible that the Plaintiff didn't deserve tenure *and* Dr. Ishii needs to be removed yesterday.
Yes, both things could certainly be true.
Even if you believe that you're stupid for repeating that often in the work place. Dr Ishii is about to find out.
It's all just allegations at this point. It's nearly impossible to defeat a summary judgment as long as you have a he said she said scenario. The plaintiff already lost as to Purdue and one prof already. Doesn't look right at this point if the plaintiff already lost summary judgment in part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Dr. Ishii called women 'stupid,' referring to them as 'doing much worse research work as men engineers' and 'using the stupid U.S. legal system to get faculty positions they do not deserve.'"
---
It's more than possible that the Plaintiff didn't deserve tenure *and* Dr. Ishii needs to be removed yesterday.
Yes, both things could certainly be true.
Even if you believe that you're stupid for repeating that often in the work place. Dr Ishii is about to find out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is terrible but honestly…aren’t Asians as a general matter harder working than white people? Specifically people in the US with Asian ancestry, especially if they have parents who sacrificed a ton for them to have a better life in the US. This is the racist version of not hiring millennials.
That’s more tied to recent immigration than race.
Anonymous wrote:This is terrible but honestly…aren’t Asians as a general matter harder working than white people? Specifically people in the US with Asian ancestry, especially if they have parents who sacrificed a ton for them to have a better life in the US. This is the racist version of not hiring millennials.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Dr. Ishii called women 'stupid,' referring to them as 'doing much worse research work as men engineers' and 'using the stupid U.S. legal system to get faculty positions they do not deserve.'"
---
It's more than possible that the Plaintiff didn't deserve tenure *and* Dr. Ishii needs to be removed yesterday.
Yes, both things could certainly be true.
Even if you believe that you're stupid for repeating that often in the work place. Dr Ishii is about to find out.
Anonymous wrote:This is terrible but honestly…aren’t Asians as a general matter harder working than white people? Specifically people in the US with Asian ancestry, especially if they have parents who sacrificed a ton for them to have a better life in the US. This is the racist version of not hiring millennials.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Dr. Ishii called women 'stupid,' referring to them as 'doing much worse research work as men engineers' and 'using the stupid U.S. legal system to get faculty positions they do not deserve.'"
---
It's more than possible that the Plaintiff didn't deserve tenure *and* Dr. Ishii needs to be removed yesterday.
Yes, both things could certainly be true.
Anonymous wrote:I actually think this will be more of a sexism than a racism case, if this professor can back up the claims.
“A senior researcher in the nuclear engineering department, Jeffrey Brooks, wrote a declaration in 2020 in Sizyuk’s defense as part of her lawsuit. The document was filed last month. In it, Brooks wrote of Sizyuk’s high qualifications for tenure. He blamed Ishii for the outcome.
“I have observed that Dr. Mamoru Ishii has a strong, outsized influence on employment decisions at Purdue Nuclear Engineering,” he wrote, describing anti-female remarks and actions.”
Anonymous wrote:"Dr. Ishii called women 'stupid,' referring to them as 'doing much worse research work as men engineers' and 'using the stupid U.S. legal system to get faculty positions they do not deserve.'"
---
It's more than possible that the Plaintiff didn't deserve tenure *and* Dr. Ishii needs to be removed yesterday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Purdue would go to trial rather than settle based on some pretty clear cut comments (imagine if they'd said that about blacks). I guess the administration agrees with the sentiment.
Purdue probably believe the courts will not take anti-white racism seriously. Maybe they are right
The judge in this case is a white girl.
I imagine she is an adult woman.
She prefers to be called young girl than an old hag.