Anonymous wrote:I gave up on ours when they formed committees to find out what the school wanted. It was a poor school, obviously they wanted everything.
I think it would be helpful if the relationship of what a PTA does and doesn't do was clearly defined across all moco. Maybe it is, I don't know. When our kid attended a wealthy school, the PTA was more like a lobbying group parents used to tell the administration what they expected. Also, bake sales.
At poorer schools, it's been more like a few people trying to keep events going in the face of crashing apathy. I'm not the best person in the world. I've pretty much given up myself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on this thread, all the talk about rich people supporting their PTA resulting in funding sources far beyond the county's contribution is nonsense. I thought it was quite normal to contribute and I give $500/year/child. If DCUM isn't giving, who is?
No one. Folks may participate or give when/if you have an event or fundraiser but before that there is no giving and very little volunteering to lead the PTA or a committee (even when you give them a budget and free reign to do whatever they want).
People have this perception that the boards are cliques or just SAHM. Folks were real surprised when they found out our entire board was working parents with multiple kids.
Anonymous wrote:Based on this thread, all the talk about rich people supporting their PTA resulting in funding sources far beyond the county's contribution is nonsense. I thought it was quite normal to contribute and I give $500/year/child. If DCUM isn't giving, who is?