Anonymous wrote:Insanity. Literally first time parents flying with a baby. They know what helps the baby at home so they bring what they know will work on the plane. That's not unreasonable or crazy. We have no idea how loud the thing actually was. Assuming with the plane white noise it wasn't actually needed but come on people. FIRST TIME PARENTS. First time taking their baby on a plane. Have some grace. Sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:List of responses to a child crying on a plane in the order of annoyance, worst to best:
1. Parents telling baby to shut up, getting annoyed with each other and sniping at each other. Have heard this many times. The worst is when they will say stuff like "Shut up, can't you see you are bothering all the other passengers." When I hear this I will sometime say, if I'm seated very close, "actually I'd much rather listen to your child cry than listen to you yell at your child for crying." Because it's horrible to hear! Kids get upset sometimes and no one enjoys listening to it, but I'm not comforted by the sound a parent verbally abusing a baby or toddler for making noise.
2. Letting child cry with no effort to address. Self-explanatory. You should do something!
3. Using audible phone/tablet noise to calm crying child. Better than crying but still very annoying. Just get headphones for the kid! You can find bluetooth headphones for kids that are fine for like $20.
4. Literally any other solution.
I feel like Kaley's solution was between #4 and #3, depending on what the white noise machine sounded like. Maybe annoying but far from the most irritating thing, and if they were having a terrible travel day and it was their first time flying with the baby, I'm inclined to give them a pass. At least they actually cared that their child was crying and did something to stop it. This already makes them better parents than many people I've flown with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:geez the whole ambient noise of a plane is like a giant sound machine for most babies, not need for a separate sound machine.
This was my thought exactly!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:geez the whole ambient noise of a plane is like a giant sound machine for most babies, not need for a separate sound machine.
This was my thought exactly!
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone see the interview? I’d be pretty pissed in that situation too. The passenger asking to turn off the noise machine was clearly either not a mom or had nannies to handle the crying babies. Team Kaley here. If you are on a horrible flight with delays and everything and the only thing that can get your baby to sleep is a noise machine next to their ear, so be it. Really, on a plane, you’re going to complain about a noise machine? Would you rather hear the crying baby?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe she's so rich without any talent or looks. I mean, that might go for most of Hollywood but she stands out. So its too bad she had such a nasty personality too
I think she's pretty. It's that Jennifer Aniston kind of pretty -- cute but in an approachable way that doesn't intimidate people. Sitcom pretty.
I also think that even though she's not like some super-talented method actor, she has a lot of skill as a TV actor in terms of timing, understanding comedic beats, and relating to scene partners as well as the camera. There are technical aspects of acting for the camera that I think most people are unaware of, and she really has them down. It's pretty much impossible to consistently work in TV as she has if you don't have those skills.
Some of her wealth is luck (huge luck in getting that role on Big Bang Theory and then that show hitting some kind of sweet spot with audiences and advertisers and running as long as it did -- every actor who lands a long running sitcom as their first major role lucked into it to some degree) but her success doesn't strike me as that surprising. She is similar to a lot of actors who have had that kind of success on TV. It's a very specific career trajectory and she fits the mold.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why call her out by name and not her DH, Tom Pelphrey?
Oh, for a moment I forgot DCUM hates women.
Uhh she was the one doing the interview that is quoted...
Anonymous wrote:Insanity. Literally first time parents flying with a baby. They know what helps the baby at home so they bring what they know will work on the plane. That's not unreasonable or crazy. We have no idea how loud the thing actually was. Assuming with the plane white noise it wasn't actually needed but come on people. FIRST TIME PARENTS. First time taking their baby on a plane. Have some grace. Sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone see the interview? I’d be pretty pissed in that situation too. The passenger asking to turn off the noise machine was clearly either not a mom or had nannies to handle the crying babies. Team Kaley here. If you are on a horrible flight with delays and everything and the only thing that can get your baby to sleep is a noise machine next to their ear, so be it. Really, on a plane, you’re going to complain about a noise machine? Would you rather hear the crying baby?
You have no basis for this assertion. Maybe she was just someone who understands the choice to bring a baby on a plane doesn't trump other passengers' rights.
Anonymous wrote:Why call her out by name and not her DH, Tom Pelphrey?
Oh, for a moment I forgot DCUM hates women.