Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice. It's all the rage.

what does this even mean?

It means the PP is a cynic and being sardonic. PP probably blathers on about DEI and thinks CRT is being taught in schools, too.

I'm that PP. So you're denying that FCPS uses Restorative Justice? Somehow I thought you would. Here, educate yourself. I'll wait for you to come back and apologize.

https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/media/forms/RJInformationPacket.pdf#:~:text=Restorative%20Justice%20is%20a%20formal%20process%20facilitated%20by,used%20to%20address%20crimes%20within%20the%20justice%20system.

Crickets, as expected.

That chart explains what RJ is and gives the steps/guidelines administrators should follow when deciding if an incident should be referred to someone trained to provide the service.

Administrators in which schools are choosing to refer to this process?

In the ES schools that I know of, RJ is not used according to the precise description and practices. Let’s call what they use RJ-lite. They get the offender and victim together to talk. They each share their perspective and feelings. One “apologizes”, the other “accepts” (not forced, but it’s understood even to the most obtuse child what is expected). And then nothing changes. This all circumvents reporting in SIS and there is no data that can be tracked.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice. It's all the rage.

what does this even mean?

It means the PP is a cynic and being sardonic. PP probably blathers on about DEI and thinks CRT is being taught in schools, too.

I'm that PP. So you're denying that FCPS uses Restorative Justice? Somehow I thought you would. Here, educate yourself. I'll wait for you to come back and apologize.

https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/media/forms/RJInformationPacket.pdf#:~:text=Restorative%20Justice%20is%20a%20formal%20process%20facilitated%20by,used%20to%20address%20crimes%20within%20the%20justice%20system.

Crickets, as expected.

That chart explains what RJ is and gives the steps/guidelines administrators should follow when deciding if an incident should be referred to someone trained to provide the service.

Administrators in which schools are choosing to refer to this process?

In the ES schools that I know of, RJ is not used according to the precise description and practices. Let’s call what they use RJ-lite. They get the offender and victim together to talk. They each share their perspective and feelings. One “apologizes”, the other “accepts” (not forced, but it’s understood even to the most obtuse child what is expected). And then nothing changes. This all circumvents reporting in SIS and there is no data that can be tracked.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice. It's all the rage.

what does this even mean?

It means the PP is a cynic and being sardonic. PP probably blathers on about DEI and thinks CRT is being taught in schools, too.

I'm that PP. So you're denying that FCPS uses Restorative Justice? Somehow I thought you would. Here, educate yourself. I'll wait for you to come back and apologize.

https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/media/forms/RJInformationPacket.pdf#:~:text=Restorative%20Justice%20is%20a%20formal%20process%20facilitated%20by,used%20to%20address%20crimes%20within%20the%20justice%20system.

Crickets, as expected.

That chart explains what RJ is and gives the steps/guidelines administrators should follow when deciding if an incident should be referred to someone trained to provide the service.

Administrators in which schools are choosing to refer to this process?

In the ES schools that I know of, RJ is not used according to the precise description and practices. Let’s call what they use RJ-lite. They get the offender and victim together to talk. They each share their perspective and feelings. One “apologizes”, the other “accepts” (not forced, but it’s understood even to the most obtuse child what is expected). And then nothing changes. This all circumvents reporting in SIS and there is no data that can be tracked.

Anonymous wrote:What about when one boy pulls the pants down of another? What happened to the pants puller ?