Anonymous wrote:I believe that unequal burden of having children is the biggest driver.
If you want to have your own biological children and you are a woman you need to have months of a physically limitations, then have months of leave from work. All during the prime promotion/sorting years of work.
That is even if both spouses contribute equally to raising the kids once they are born, which isn't the current societal norm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and a feminist, but if I were a man there’s no way I would want to cede power. It’s human nature, it’s institutional, and it’s passed down via conditioning, much of it subconscious. Where is the *collective* desire for things to change?
In women?
Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and a feminist, but if I were a man there’s no way I would want to cede power. It’s human nature, it’s institutional, and it’s passed down via conditioning, much of it subconscious. Where is the *collective* desire for things to change?
Anonymous wrote:Definitely women contribute to this problem. Particularly right wing uneducated Christian women who still believe their role is mother/homemaker, supporting their man.
Anonymous wrote:Definitely women contribute to this problem. Particularly right wing uneducated Christian women who still believe their role is mother/homemaker, supporting their man.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and a feminist, but if I were a man there’s no way I would want to cede power. It’s human nature, it’s institutional, and it’s passed down via conditioning, much of it subconscious. Where is the *collective* desire for things to change?
household.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely women contribute to this problem. Particularly right wing uneducated Christian women who still believe their role is mother/homemaker, supporting their man.
I'm a left wing and very educated but begrudgingly admit that my role as mother and homemaker has been exponentially better for my children and my husband's career. Which means better for my life but short term and long term. We could have switched roles but while I could have made what DH makes (which is a lot), he would have been mediocre at raising the kids and keeping our house running. American society is barely set up for 2 working parents, let alone 2 working parents who want to have high-achieving, well-adjusted kids and happy parents. That's why the patriarchy is alive and well.
The idea that men are incapable and inefficient at household duties is myth. Of course your husband never cared about learning how to manage a household, he saw his mother do it all for him and then you happily stepped into the role to do the same. And then of course your daughters will do the same and leave the workforce while your sons never learn to do chores or manage a household.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know we like to blame men, and that's definitely a big part of it, but I think we need to look at the issue other women bring to it as well. This forum is a good example to see how women play a part in contributing to the patriarchy. Shaming women for working, shaming women for putting themselves first, shaming women for staying at home, shame, shame, shame. Im real life, I've dealt with female managers trying to tear me down because the big boss has liked my ideas. I've seen people talk shit about a female boss for no reason other than she was a powerful female.
So yes, men play a huge role. But ignoring how we contribute to it too will never get the issue solved.
All of this. The patriarchy persists because internalized misogyny is everywhere and there are insufficient social supports for women with professional ambition who'd also like to be good, engaged mothers.
Yes and yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely women contribute to this problem. Particularly right wing uneducated Christian women who still believe their role is mother/homemaker, supporting their man.
I'm a left wing and very educated but begrudgingly admit that my role as mother and homemaker has been exponentially better for my children and my husband's career. Which means better for my life but short term and long term. We could have switched roles but while I could have made what DH makes (which is a lot), he would have been mediocre at raising the kids and keeping our house running. American society is barely set up for 2 working parents, let alone 2 working parents who want to have high-achieving, well-adjusted kids and happy parents. That's why the patriarchy is alive and well.
Anonymous wrote:Definitely women contribute to this problem. Particularly right wing uneducated Christian women who still believe their role is mother/homemaker, supporting their man.
Anonymousquote wrote:
I'm a left wing and very educated but begrudgingly admit that my role as mother and homemaker has been exponentially better for my children and my husband's career. Which means better for my life but short term and long term. We could have switched roles but while I could have made what DH makes (which is a lot), he would have been mediocre at raising the kids and keeping our house running. American society is barely set up for 2 working parents, let alone 2 working parents who want to have high-achieving, well-adjusted kids and happy parents. That's why the patriarchy is alive and well.