Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you are 4.0 UW, 12 APs, all 5s on APs, 2 years post BC Calc, with strong ECs...what is possible...If you are saying "standard strong" is 3.85 UW, 8 APs
4.0 UW in DMV publics is the median GPA, isn't it??
Thanks to grade inflation, yes it is.
Oh come off it. A 4.0 UW is all As. That is not the median by any means and everyone knows it.
Anonymous wrote:Debate will help if you are good enough to make the university team, as in having a national or international achievement record. DC’s school had a number (high-single digit) of kids taking math three years post-calc. They all did well, though mostly not HYPSM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admit rates:
UChicago - 6%
Vandy - 7%
Brown - 6%
JHU - 8%
Northwestern - 7%
I want to believe this list, but I'm struggling with why I should think these are more "on the table" than other sub-10% admit schools.
They would all need to be ED apps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admit rates:
UChicago - 6%
Vandy - 7%
Brown - 6%
JHU - 8%
Northwestern - 7%
I want to believe this list, but I'm struggling with why I should think these are more "on the table" than other sub-10% admit schools.
They would all need to be ED apps.
U Chicago, Northwestern, Vandy, JHU yes--must be ED. Don't know anyone who's gotten into Chicago RD in years. Brown--kids from our magnet school don't seem to get in RD or ED. Cornell yes, Brown no. JHU very tough either way.
I think you've got it spot-on. Our junior is standard strong. Great kid; will be an even better adult. Hasn't yet found that calling--and so will look for it at Wisconsin (or wherever) instead of Harvard (or wherever).Anonymous wrote:I don’t think standard strong is a state debate champ. I thought standard strong was a really great student with high GPA, rigor, high SAT (1500) and good EC, but not a top standout?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you are 4.0 UW, 12 APs, all 5s on APs, 2 years post BC Calc, with strong ECs...what is possible...If you are saying "standard strong" is 3.85 UW, 8 APs
That’s why it’s important to define standard strong before throwing out names. Your student is strong. Better than standard strong.
disagree. standard strong in DCUM world is 3.9 plus in a known, rigorous high school where 3.9 is top 5% of the class. AP count is rather meaningless. 8 vs 12 would have more to do with school policy of limits, etc. Test scores are 1550+. The two years post BC Calc is impressive but unusual and not more impressive than a state debate champ, which is also standard strong.
IOW, these are kids who would have had a very good chance at a top 10 uni even just pre covid.
Top standouts have a chances at top schools, and it’s at least worth apply to. Standard strong students are definitely a notch below. They don’t show exemplary interest, devotion, passion. But perhaps I’ve been misinterpreting the term! I appreciate the discussion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admit rates:
UChicago - 6%
Vandy - 7%
Brown - 6%
JHU - 8%
Northwestern - 7%
I want to believe this list, but I'm struggling with why I should think these are more "on the table" than other sub-10% admit schools.
They would all need to be ED apps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you are 4.0 UW, 12 APs, all 5s on APs, 2 years post BC Calc, with strong ECs...what is possible...If you are saying "standard strong" is 3.85 UW, 8 APs
That’s why it’s important to define standard strong before throwing out names. Your student is strong. Better than standard strong.
disagree. standard strong in DCUM world is 3.9 plus in a known, rigorous high school where 3.9 is top 5% of the class. AP count is rather meaningless. 8 vs 12 would have more to do with school policy of limits, etc. Test scores are 1550+. The two years post BC Calc is impressive but unusual and not more impressive than a state debate champ, which is also standard strong.
IOW, these are kids who would have had a very good chance at a top 10 uni even just pre covid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you are 4.0 UW, 12 APs, all 5s on APs, 2 years post BC Calc, with strong ECs...what is possible...If you are saying "standard strong" is 3.85 UW, 8 APs
4.0 UW in DMV publics is the median GPA, isn't it??
Thanks to grade inflation, yes it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you are 4.0 UW, 12 APs, all 5s on APs, 2 years post BC Calc, with strong ECs...what is possible...If you are saying "standard strong" is 3.85 UW, 8 APs
4.0 UW in DMV publics is the median GPA, isn't it??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you are 4.0 UW, 12 APs, all 5s on APs, 2 years post BC Calc, with strong ECs...what is possible...If you are saying "standard strong" is 3.85 UW, 8 APs
That’s why it’s important to define standard strong before throwing out names. Your student is strong. Better than standard strong.
disagree. standard strong in DCUM world is 3.9 plus in a known, rigorous high school where 3.9 is top 5% of the class. AP count is rather meaningless. 8 vs 12 would have more to do with school policy of limits, etc. Test scores are 1550+. The two years post BC Calc is impressive but unusual and not more impressive than a state debate champ, which is also standard strong.
IOW, these are kids who would have had a very good chance at a top 10 uni even just pre covid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you are 4.0 UW, 12 APs, all 5s on APs, 2 years post BC Calc, with strong ECs...what is possible...If you are saying "standard strong" is 3.85 UW, 8 APs
4.0 UW in DMV publics is the median GPA, isn't it??
Anonymous wrote:What if you are 4.0 UW, 12 APs, all 5s on APs, 2 years post BC Calc, with strong ECs...what is possible...If you are saying "standard strong" is 3.85 UW, 8 APs