I have it in cream and use it as my laptop bag. It is an absolute workhorse. I travel weekly and put it under the seat in front of me on the plane. I would never do that with any other handbag. I still haven’t found a better looking bag that is as strong and fits a laptop

I would be embarrassed to use it in a professional setting. I don't need my clients to see what I am wearing and know exactly what paid. It's so garish.

I had one years ago, not sure what it was called then. I used it for a diaper bag, then a toddler bag. Now it just screams "moooooom!". I downsized as soon as I was able.

Too common and easily replicated. It’s a starter bag for those who want people to know they wear designer. To be fair though, I think that about all LV really.

Ostentatious and dull

Classic. Good work tote. Indestructible and never shows wear.

Another example of Princess Di with the monogram toiletry pouch. I think she looks very stylish, but again, I’m not sure the NF gives the same polished look.

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1007/2348/files/EmOZKbYUYAEUsHV_480x480.jpg?v=1608158904

I think the LV monogram can look classic, chic even, on a well dressed woman who wears it in a very utilitarian way. That’s hard with the NF due to its size and how closely it’s worn to the body. It’s too schlepy, I think. And I say this as a woman who owns the Neverfull

Here’s a some good example of Angelina Jolie nicely rocking the sac plat. Hopefully the image embedding works.

https://i.pinimg.com/474x/f7/d0/bb/f7d0bb875b375884245ce5ab4a911ce9.jpg" border="0" class="embeddedImage" />

https://i.pinimg.com/474x/f7/d0/bb/f7d0bb875b375884245ce5ab4a911ce9.jpg

Good convo! I agree - I think it can be all of those. It's a personal choice, and if you want one go for it and eff what anyone else thinks. I don't like logos, so I wouldn't get one even if I could afford it. But who cares what I think?

Anonymous wrote:The thing about the Neverfull is that people will make one of two assumptions about you: (1) You can't really afford luxury items and you've saved up for years to buy this one so people will think you're fancy or (2) It's fake and you want people to think you can afford it.

THIS. 100% this.

Cheesy, suburban, and classic.

I own one but dont use it much past my 30’s. Maybe to schlep a bunch of stuff to the dry cleaners or carry returns to the mall

Anonymous wrote:Classic. As a warning, this bag seems to trigger a lot of DCUM users.

This

The thing is a tank I don’t care what others think.

Very useful bag. Say what you will about LV, but mine have held up so much better than my other expensive bags (Chloe, Gucci, Mulberry, YSL). You can throw them around and not baby them and they are pretty indestructible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the graceful?

still has the logos so same issue.

I like the damier ebena (chckerboard) pattern. is that still horrible?

Anonymous wrote:I am extremely basic and would never carry a bag that is covered in logos. The one that is less logo plastered is a bit more subtle but honestly just sends messages that I don’t wish to convey. But that is my opinion, and if others enjoy carrying them and can afford it, more power to them and Bernard Arnault.

op - i am willing to bet you are not as basic as you think you are. judging by your take here.