Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let the highest achieving kids get in and stop with the DEI nonsense. Just because your kid is disadvantaged and can barely read doesn’t mean they should go to Harvard.
Highest achieving in what aspect? There are people a lot smarter than you who work on achieving a balanced group of students. There is no simple formula to obtain that.
I can imagine the amount of cheating going on if all that mattered is perfect scores on academic. Or the mental health of the students whose childhood was spent on trying to never make a mistake while having unstable parents breathing down their necks.
Anonymous wrote:Let the highest achieving kids get in and stop with the DEI nonsense. Just because your kid is disadvantaged and can barely read doesn’t mean they should go to Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would you ever think that the current admissions system is equitable? It has never been and likely will never be. Get over it.
Because these institutions live, breathe and die for DEI. Yet here we are.
They are mocking us.
Is this the FOX News version?
Nice try, but the cute bashing of Fox News lost its luster when the Left & their media partners decided it was open season on Jews.
Um, the end of your sentence is the tell there.
Anonymous wrote:They need someone who can pay.
Anonymous wrote:Let the highest achieving kids get in and stop with the DEI nonsense. Just because your kid is disadvantaged and can barely read doesn’t mean they should go to Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would you ever think that the current admissions system is equitable? It has never been and likely will never be. Get over it.
Because these institutions live, breathe and die for DEI. Yet here we are.
They are mocking us.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what there is to be outraged about. 40% is unsurprising. Privilege has always been a well trodden path to the ivies, probably used to be the most reliable path and likely filled the majority of the class. It’s been reduced in order to make space for others. What percentage should it be considering these schools are in the business of staying open and need people who can pay full freight?
Anonymous wrote:Independent private schools (not the Mary O'Mary's Catholic/parochial school for girls and boys type that middle and lower middle class families send their kids to), comprise 40% of the student body at most Ivy League schools.
Where is the outrage in the name of equity? Where are the protests? The changemakers? Maybe there will be a sit-in at Harvard this admissions season, definitely at Brown. Rise up, no equity, no peace...
Bueller...Bueller...
Anonymous wrote:This is the sort of hypocrisy that spawned the MAGA movement, & is giving it new life for 2024. The woke elites want open borders but migrants flood already crowded poor neighborhoods. They want soft-on-crime DAs but they can afford private security. They preach diversity but it’s Biden or Newsom who will be the nominee in 2024.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the sort of hypocrisy that spawned the MAGA movement, & is giving it new life for 2024. The woke elites want open borders but migrants flood already crowded poor neighborhoods. They want soft-on-crime DAs but they can afford private security. They preach diversity but it’s Biden or Newsom who will be the nominee in 2024.
Sometimes I think there are Russian bots on this site just trying to pick fights. This is all mixed up and the things and people that the poster is trying to draw connections between don’t match up right. Crazy.
Independent private schools (not the Mary O'Mary's Catholic/parochial school for girls and boys type that middle and lower middle class families send their kids to), comprise 40% of the student body at most Ivy League schools.