Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are all nuts. Except for those who wrote normal responses. I pay $30 an hour. The former nanny used to work for 6 hours a day. And no, she didn’t have to be with infants or toddlers. She used to do projects with our youngest: play dough, art, construction paper, etc. they used to spend time outside or ran around the house playing tag or hide and seek. She used her phone only when her grandson called (they live together). It’s sad they moved to a different state. I pay for a nanny so our youngest doesn’t have to sit with me for 2,5 hours while the other child is training. So she doesn’t have to be in the car for an hour. So she can have her own classes like ballet and art. Yeah, I guess it’s time to look for a new nanny. Why on earth should she be reading news while at work? I am not asking to hover over my daughter, I want to make sure they are doing nice fun things together.
Wow, sounds you like you don't want to be around or spend any time with your youngest. Sad.
Exactly. OP wants to be able to sit and scroll on her phone for the 2.5 hours she's waiting for her older child to "train."
Anonymous wrote:You are all nuts. Except for those who wrote normal responses. I pay $30 an hour. The former nanny used to work for 6 hours a day. And no, she didn’t have to be with infants or toddlers. She used to do projects with our youngest: play dough, art, construction paper, etc. they used to spend time outside or ran around the house playing tag or hide and seek. She used her phone only when her grandson called (they live together). It’s sad they moved to a different state. I pay for a nanny so our youngest doesn’t have to sit with me for 2,5 hours while the other child is training. So she doesn’t have to be in the car for an hour. So she can have her own classes like ballet and art. Yeah, I guess it’s time to look for a new nanny. Why on earth should she be reading news while at work? I am not asking to hover over my daughter, I want to make sure they are doing nice fun things together.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would fire her and get a new nanny. Easy peasy.
Definitely not "easy peasy." Very difficult to find someone willing to work 25 hours/week because typically that's not enough money. Plus, from OP's description this is an extraordinarily unpleasant child. She "rejects the nanny" and even the kid's own parents refuse to spend time with her, preferring to pawn her off to someone they have to pay.
Oh shut up. The kid is normal and doesn't want to play with a stranger. She's fine on her own which is developmentally appropriate. If the nanny isn't doing part of her job because she's on the phone then focus on that. If OP wants to insist that the nanny bother the child and insist on playing together then fire her because she's not doing that. But she's going to have a hard time finding a replacement.
Oh shut up. The nanny has been working for them for at least several months and is not a stranger. She probably knows the nanny better than the parents.
Leave the kid out of your nonsense.
"The kid" is what the whole thing is about-otherwise there is no need to hire a nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are all nuts. Except for those who wrote normal responses. I pay $30 an hour. The former nanny used to work for 6 hours a day. And no, she didn’t have to be with infants or toddlers. She used to do projects with our youngest: play dough, art, construction paper, etc. they used to spend time outside or ran around the house playing tag or hide and seek. She used her phone only when her grandson called (they live together). It’s sad they moved to a different state. I pay for a nanny so our youngest doesn’t have to sit with me for 2,5 hours while the other child is training. So she doesn’t have to be in the car for an hour. So she can have her own classes like ballet and art. Yeah, I guess it’s time to look for a new nanny. Why on earth should she be reading news while at work? I am not asking to hover over my daughter, I want to make sure they are doing nice fun things together.
Wow, sounds you like you don't want to be around or spend any time with your youngest. Sad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would fire her and get a new nanny. Easy peasy.
Definitely not "easy peasy." Very difficult to find someone willing to work 25 hours/week because typically that's not enough money. Plus, from OP's description this is an extraordinarily unpleasant child. She "rejects the nanny" and even the kid's own parents refuse to spend time with her, preferring to pawn her off to someone they have to pay.
Oh shut up. The kid is normal and doesn't want to play with a stranger. She's fine on her own which is developmentally appropriate. If the nanny isn't doing part of her job because she's on the phone then focus on that. If OP wants to insist that the nanny bother the child and insist on playing together then fire her because she's not doing that. But she's going to have a hard time finding a replacement.
Oh shut up. The nanny has been working for them for at least several months and is not a stranger. She probably knows the nanny better than the parents.
Leave the kid out of your nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:You are all nuts. Except for those who wrote normal responses. I pay $30 an hour. The former nanny used to work for 6 hours a day. And no, she didn’t have to be with infants or toddlers. She used to do projects with our youngest: play dough, art, construction paper, etc. they used to spend time outside or ran around the house playing tag or hide and seek. She used her phone only when her grandson called (they live together). It’s sad they moved to a different state. I pay for a nanny so our youngest doesn’t have to sit with me for 2,5 hours while the other child is training. So she doesn’t have to be in the car for an hour. So she can have her own classes like ballet and art. Yeah, I guess it’s time to look for a new nanny. Why on earth should she be reading news while at work? I am not asking to hover over my daughter, I want to make sure they are doing nice fun things together.
Anonymous wrote:You are all nuts. Except for those who wrote normal responses. I pay $30 an hour. The former nanny used to work for 6 hours a day. And no, she didn’t have to be with infants or toddlers. She used to do projects with our youngest: play dough, art, construction paper, etc. they used to spend time outside or ran around the house playing tag or hide and seek. She used her phone only when her grandson called (they live together). It’s sad they moved to a different state. I pay for a nanny so our youngest doesn’t have to sit with me for 2,5 hours while the other child is training. So she doesn’t have to be in the car for an hour. So she can have her own classes like ballet and art. Yeah, I guess it’s time to look for a new nanny. Why on earth should she be reading news while at work? I am not asking to hover over my daughter, I want to make sure they are doing nice fun things together.
Anonymous wrote:Some of you are nuts. Yes a 5yo should be able to entertain herself. She shouldn’t have to though after school 5x a week if there is an adult sitter there.
I have an 11yo only. She’s perfectly capable of staying alone the 3 hours a days we both work ( it’s only twice a week) but we pay a sitter because she needs driving places. Sitter also plays basketball with her, soccer, Uno, draws etc….. my kid likes the company. I’m not paying a sitter to sit on her phone I’m paying her to
Interact with my kid. As is OP.
OP what happens if the sitter suggests to your 5yo they play a game?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would fire her and get a new nanny. Easy peasy.
Definitely not "easy peasy." Very difficult to find someone willing to work 25 hours/week because typically that's not enough money. Plus, from OP's description this is an extraordinarily unpleasant child. She "rejects the nanny" and even the kid's own parents refuse to spend time with her, preferring to pawn her off to someone they have to pay.
Oh shut up. The kid is normal and doesn't want to play with a stranger. She's fine on her own which is developmentally appropriate. If the nanny isn't doing part of her job because she's on the phone then focus on that. If OP wants to insist that the nanny bother the child and insist on playing together then fire her because she's not doing that. But she's going to have a hard time finding a replacement.
Oh shut up. The nanny has been working for them for at least several months and is not a stranger. She probably knows the nanny better than the parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP has commented again but not answered how much she pays.
Pay her more to do more. Assign tasks including documentary evidence of what your want her to do (or use a camera)
OP knows she is paying an inadequate wage, and getting what she pays for.
Anonymous wrote:OP has commented again but not answered how much she pays.
Pay her more to do more. Assign tasks including documentary evidence of what your want her to do (or use a camera)
Anonymous wrote:I would fire her and get a new nanny. Easy peasy.