Anonymous wrote:For the first time ever, I have considered leaving the District. Actually, crime is not a factor. I just think the City is so poorly run again. The mayor and council are a mess. City services are bad again. Those affect my quality of life.
I don't actually fear being a victim of crime.
Anonymous wrote:DC has been poorly run (or struggling to manage around its problems) and a higher ratio of crime to its nicer satellite suburbs that have no obligations to DCs problems and operations for over a hundred years . People have done the math and left for these ever since. It is only the current crop of transplants that want their cake and eat it too that seem to think if they whine loud enough that someone will come along an fix everything
Anonymous wrote:I moved here in 1990 and had almost no awareness that crime was a problem. It was exciting to be in DC as a young 20s professional. I took basic precautions but don't ever remember being afraid.
The only reason we moved to Bethesda was to have better school choices. So far, the only crime I know of affecting our neighborhood are unlocked cars occasionally being burgled. Our teenagers roam freely to go buy ice cream or skate board. Houses do not sit more than a few days on the market. So maybe I'm still just clueless after all these years, but I think there's some alarmist tendencies in this thread.
Anonymous wrote:I came upon this thread by googling ‘is crime affecting dc real estate’ and I find it interesting to read people’s opinions. I have considered putting my Petworth house on the market or renting it because I would like to feel safer. I have not been the victim of crime but it’s so nearby it’s a big possibility. I tend to drive everywhere and take shorter walks with my small dog.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arlington agent here. I settled three houses this year and have another settling in a few days for people leaving DC because of crime. All of them rented their properties, so the rental market doesn't seem to be affected by the crime rate.
Cannot wait to hear their stories when they try to sell their DC rental. Dumb move on their parts, they should have sold those homes. You should have advised them to do so.
They probably have a sub-3% interest rate and keeping the property is a hedge that crime will improve in DC (hint: it will).
The current crime wave is driven by deliberate policy choices made by entrenched actors. Those policies (and actors) will change at some point.
Even in the awful 80s and 90s, DC prices were either rising or flat AND exceeded national trends:
My comment was not related to crime. It's related to the blindly, pro-tenant policies of the DC govt. If you are a landlord you are screwed. There are pretty much no protections in place for you because you're unworthy scum in the eyes of DC. You want to be a low life tenant though? Come on in! Don't pay your rent, it doesn't matter there is nothing anyone can do to you. The homeowner wants to sell the home when your lease is up? Too bad for them, you the tenant have the right of first refusal, and you can also just refuse to leave - aka "squat".
Anonymous wrote:To those that think crime isn’t affecting prices or are staying put, does this change at 400 murders a year? 500? How much crime is too much? Murders have more than doubled since 2008-2010 so it’s not impossible for this trend to continue.
Anonymous wrote:To those that think crime isn’t affecting prices or are staying put, does this change at 400 murders a year? 500? How much crime is too much? Murders have more than doubled since 2008-2010 so it’s not impossible for this trend to continue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arlington agent here. I settled three houses this year and have another settling in a few days for people leaving DC because of crime. All of them rented their properties, so the rental market doesn't seem to be affected by the crime rate.
Cannot wait to hear their stories when they try to sell their DC rental. Dumb move on their parts, they should have sold those homes. You should have advised them to do so.
They probably have a sub-3% interest rate and keeping the property is a hedge that crime will improve in DC (hint: it will).
The current crime wave is driven by deliberate policy choices made by entrenched actors. Those policies (and actors) will change at some point.
Even in the awful 80s and 90s, DC prices were either rising or flat AND exceeded national trends:
My comment was not related to crime. It's related to the blindly, pro-tenant policies of the DC govt. If you are a landlord you are screwed. There are pretty much no protections in place for you because you're unworthy scum in the eyes of DC. You want to be a low life tenant though? Come on in! Don't pay your rent, it doesn't matter there is nothing anyone can do to you. The homeowner wants to sell the home when your lease is up? Too bad for them, you the tenant have the right of first refusal, and you can also just refuse to leave - aka "squat".