Anonymous wrote:So they require everyone submit their low test scores. And that makes you feel better?
It’s 80% white which is probably a feature and not a big for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA, UMich, UCs,.. (Tier 1) > UF, Tenn, UMD, etc > Penn St, Delaware, JMU, etc
I wouldn't put it above Penn State except in terms of weather.
Do you have evidence or is this your opinion?
Dude, this is not an article for the Economist, it's DCUM. What "evidence" do you have to refute PP's assertion? News flash, no matter what you respond with, it still is just certain pieces to support your view on UTK, but nothing is "evidence".
Have you taken an elementary research course?
Stop posting your stupid questions and provide your "evidence".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA, UMich, UCs,.. (Tier 1) > UF, Tenn, UMD, etc > Penn St, Delaware, JMU, etc
I wouldn't put it above Penn State except in terms of weather.
Do you have evidence or is this your opinion?
Dude, this is not an article for the Economist, it's DCUM. What "evidence" do you have to refute PP's assertion? News flash, no matter what you respond with, it still is just certain pieces to support your view on UTK, but nothing is "evidence".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel better because some so many schools are so artificially high in scores that it is not realistic. No one is sending scores. Then your kid doesn’t get in because they really do want to see a score. It is not fair. People are feeling bad about a 1400 and that is something like a 95 percent. Schools that force you to send really do look at whole application and that is good.
Exactly. The schools trumpeting their test optional policies aren't doing it to be woke or to give kids a chance who can't afford $50k prep courses or whatever other bull crap they claim. They're doing it so they can report a 33-35 ACT midrange on their common data set and look elite even though fewer than 20% of their applicants actually submitted their scores and the majority of those who matriculate score much lower.
DCUM woke snobs might thumb their nose at UTK's 25-31 midrange, but at least it's honest. The "elite" schools they cream over would probably look similar if they stopped playing stupid ranking games and made everyone submit.
Anonymous wrote:I feel better because some so many schools are so artificially high in scores that it is not realistic. No one is sending scores. Then your kid doesn’t get in because they really do want to see a score. It is not fair. People are feeling bad about a 1400 and that is something like a 95 percent. Schools that force you to send really do look at whole application and that is good.
Anonymous wrote:So they require everyone submit their low test scores. And that makes you feel better?
It’s 80% white which is probably a feature and not a big for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We loved our visit to UTK. In his top 5.
Admissions rate is now in low 40s.
Proof?
Anonymous wrote:UVA, UMich, UCs,.. (Tier 1) > UF, Tenn, UMD, etc > Penn St, Delaware, JMU, etc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA, UMich, UCs,.. (Tier 1) > UF, Tenn, UMD, etc > Penn St, Delaware, JMU, etc
UF is far above Tenn and UMD. Not Michigan or UCLA level but definitely a closer tier to UVA than UMD. The second tier is:
Washington, Florida, UT-A, Georgia Tech, Ohio State, Georgia, UNC, W&M (in no particular order)
Next: Tenn, Maryland, UMass, Rutgers, etc.
Next: Delaware, JMU, etc.
I’ll buy this list - just move Ohio State down a tier and Rutgers up one - Rutgers has branding/image problem but an excellent education