Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's time for kitty to cross the rainbow bridge. He is ancient and suffering. Let him end his wonderful life as pain free as you can. I'm sorry for you loss. Losing a pet is so sad, but what I find much more heartbreaking is when people refuse to let a dying pet go and make them suffer because it's "too hard" to end their suffering.
Some of us find it more difficult to justify interfering with the natural process. If that animal was in the wild, that animal would be living. Human beings have designed many conveniences with the justification of “it’s good for them”: crating puppies, sleep training babies, putting old animals down… It’s a gray area and I am convinced that we do these more for our own convenience then lie to ourselves that it’s best for all. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn’t.
In your hypothetical wild animals scenario, it would not live very long. Vultures circling. Hard to find water and food.
Also, animals can’t talk. Thy can’t say how much pain their are in. They mask it so well.
Because of this it is not cruel to put them down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's time for kitty to cross the rainbow bridge. He is ancient and suffering. Let him end his wonderful life as pain free as you can. I'm sorry for you loss. Losing a pet is so sad, but what I find much more heartbreaking is when people refuse to let a dying pet go and make them suffer because it's "too hard" to end their suffering.
Some of us find it more difficult to justify interfering with the natural process. If that animal was in the wild, that animal would be living. Human beings have designed many conveniences with the justification of “it’s good for them”: crating puppies, sleep training babies, putting old animals down… It’s a gray area and I am convinced that we do these more for our own convenience then lie to ourselves that it’s best for all. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn’t.
Anonymous wrote:The odds are the cat will not pass peacefully. They rarely suddenly die, it is a longer process over several days/weeks. The poor thing will be dying and of course the pet sitter won't want to tell you to put it out of its misery so the kitty will suffer.
Anonymous wrote:I think it sounds like he is suffering and you should probably do the brave thing and have him put to sleep.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you find a cat sitter who’d stay in your home? At least this way the cat wouldn’t be alone?
+1. That is what we do with our elderly dog. It helps that we have a nice home and most pet sitters want to stay in a beautiful space for free (and be paid on top of that). It’s a good gig.
Staying in a nice home makes up for the stress and responsibility of taking care of someone' s dying dog? an elderly dog, fine but not one that is in end stages. That is most definitely not a good gig.
Anonymous wrote:It's time for kitty to cross the rainbow bridge. He is ancient and suffering. Let him end his wonderful life as pain free as you can. I'm sorry for you loss. Losing a pet is so sad, but what I find much more heartbreaking is when people refuse to let a dying pet go and make them suffer because it's "too hard" to end their suffering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you find a cat sitter who’d stay in your home? At least this way the cat wouldn’t be alone?
+1. That is what we do with our elderly dog. It helps that we have a nice home and most pet sitters want to stay in a beautiful space for free (and be paid on top of that). It’s a good gig.
Anonymous wrote:His kidney are probably done for. I think it’s painful too.
Euthanize. He had an awesome life I bet.
Anonymous wrote:Can you find a cat sitter who’d stay in your home? At least this way the cat wouldn’t be alone?