Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 19:04     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:Nope, the woman is unlikeable.


No one who gets to know her can stand her.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 16:24     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nope, the woman is unlikeable.


"I don't like the woman."

Fixed that for you.

DP. I agree with the assessment that she’s unlikeable. She whines a lot but does so the obnoxious accusatory and aggressive tone of an LEO. No thanks.


"I also don't like the woman."

“I don’t like authoritative women.” 🙄
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 16:18     Subject: Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Spanberger has repeatedly demonstrated an ability to win close races in competitive districts, even when she's smeared by Republicans. I'm willing to hear her out. But first she has to articulate a vision for the Commonwealth.

+1 And I’m mystified by those who find her unlikeable. I find her incredibly relatable, but I’m also a center left suburban white mom.

Thats awesome. She seems to have a problem with black folk though and that’s going to hurt her chances statewide and probably why she will ultimately lose.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 16:15     Subject: Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:I hope Winsome Earle-Sears
runs!!!


She would be the best candidate.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 16:09     Subject: Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:Spanberger has repeatedly demonstrated an ability to win close races in competitive districts, even when she's smeared by Republicans. I'm willing to hear her out. But first she has to articulate a vision for the Commonwealth.

+1 And I’m mystified by those who find her unlikeable. I find her incredibly relatable, but I’m also a center left suburban white mom.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 15:50     Subject: Spanberger for Governor
No one in Richmond or surrounding area (Henrico, Chesterfield and Hanover) like Stoney. nope.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 15:40     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Both Spanberger and Stoney are great. I hope someday we go back to a time when Democratic primaries between great candidates didn’t feel so existential. I’m constantly afraid that if one tears the other down too much we’ll lose the general.


It’s Stoney’s turn.

No one is entitled to higher office. Also, I have full confidence than Spanberger isn’t corrupt. Stoney, not sure. Casinos, real estate development are notoriously corrupt.

If you’re going to call people corrupt you better have proof.


NP. I don't know if Stoney is corrupt, but he's certainly an idiot. He goes around striking deals with major developers and just thinks the city council and voters will fall in line.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 15:34     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Both Spanberger and Stoney are great. I hope someday we go back to a time when Democratic primaries between great candidates didn’t feel so existential. I’m constantly afraid that if one tears the other down too much we’ll lose the general.


It’s Stoney’s turn.

No one is entitled to higher office. Also, I have full confidence than Spanberger isn’t corrupt. Stoney, not sure. Casinos, real estate development are notoriously corrupt.

If you’re going to call people corrupt you better have proof.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 15:31     Subject: Spanberger for Governor
Spanberger has repeatedly demonstrated an ability to win close races in competitive districts, even when she's smeared by Republicans. I'm willing to hear her out. But first she has to articulate a vision for the Commonwealth.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 15:28     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nope, the woman is unlikeable.


"I don't like the woman."

Fixed that for you.

DP. I agree with the assessment that she’s unlikeable. She whines a lot but does so the obnoxious accusatory and aggressive tone of an LEO. No thanks.


"I also don't like the woman."
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 15:23     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nope, the woman is unlikeable.


"I don't like the woman."

Fixed that for you.

DP. I agree with the assessment that she’s unlikeable. She whines a lot but does so the obnoxious accusatory and aggressive tone of an LEO. No thanks.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 15:20     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:Nope, the woman is unlikeable.


"I don't like the woman."

Fixed that for you.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 15:12     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Nope, the woman is unlikeable.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 14:36     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Both Spanberger and Stoney are great. I hope someday we go back to a time when Democratic primaries between great candidates didn’t feel so existential. I’m constantly afraid that if one tears the other down too much we’ll lose the general.


It’s Stoney’s turn.

No one is entitled to higher office. Also, I have full confidence than Spanberger isn’t corrupt. Stoney, not sure. Casinos, real estate development are notoriously corrupt.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2023 08:55     Subject: Re:Spanberger for Governor
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Both Spanberger and Stoney are great. I hope someday we go back to a time when Democratic primaries between great candidates didn’t feel so existential. I’m constantly afraid that if one tears the other down too much we’ll lose the general.


It’s Stoney’s turn.

Spanberger on paper seems to have all of the advantages. But then she talks and becomes immediately unlikeable. The Richmond area seems to hold the keys to winning the primary. So I think Abigail may be finding herself out of work come next year.


Richmonder here. Stoney is widely hated. I don’t mean mildly disliked I mean HATED. He forced a 2nd casino vote on us that he just lost, got plenty of campaign donations from the prospective company, Urban ONE.