I was in Target over there and two guys walked out with two tvs each. Security didn’t budge

cities will only be safe when the majority carry. Imagine how polite everybody will be and how frustrated criminals would be. Plus its practically free. At least due to the second amendment there are still places to escape to if libs libbing make life unbearable.

Anonymous wrote:You act like CVS is not a billion dollar conglomerate. Could you imagine if FEDEx field did not hire it's own security.

They need to hire security.

So the city is refusing to take care of basic services, land the answer is privatization where the people who have the money can afford protection and the rest of us are thrown to the wolves. It's funny to see how quickly the policies advocated by avowed socialists have lead us to a libertarian dystopia. Only one where we're still paying hefty taxes for a dysfunctional government.

Though even then, I don't see how private security can do anything. They can tell the thieves to stop, they thieves will ignore them, and then? Physically apprehend them until the police come? You're going to risk personal injury, maybe even death, protestors will come down hard on you if the criminal gets hurt in the scuffle, and the criminals aren't even going to get prosecuted. They'll be let out and just show up again the next day. Having security that can't actually do anything to stop theft is just throwing money away paying someone to sit around doing nothing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Police officers tried to pull over a guy who was on probation with an ankle monitor and high on drugs. He ran off, they followed, he drove into a car and was killed, the police were convicted of murder. The judge in the case said the jury wasn't allowed to know the guy who ran off had an ankle monitor on and drugs in his system:

https://dcist.com/story/23/05/18/karen-hylton-charged-courtroom-reaction-sutton-verdict/

The only crime this year where Councilmembers Parker and Frumin got outraged and demanded action from the USAO was when a citizen shot a car thief.

Why doesn't anyone try to stop these criminals? Because the leadership in D.C. hasn't created a society that's a free for all with no rules. It's created a society where criminals are allowed to do whatever they like, but law abiding citizens are going to have the hammer brought down on them if they ever dare to fight back.

You're allowed to defend yourself with reasonable force. You can't execute someone running away from you. Be reasonable.

If the person running away is a thief they should be apprehended by whatever means necessary.

I like the way you think and would love to stand outside of Wall street and shoot them as they walk away, most of even felons so it's not such a big deal. Ill even make sure they have an SEC violation or a tax fraud conviction.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Police officers tried to pull over a guy who was on probation with an ankle monitor and high on drugs. He ran off, they followed, he drove into a car and was killed, the police were convicted of murder. The judge in the case said the jury wasn't allowed to know the guy who ran off had an ankle monitor on and drugs in his system:

https://dcist.com/story/23/05/18/karen-hylton-charged-courtroom-reaction-sutton-verdict/

The only crime this year where Councilmembers Parker and Frumin got outraged and demanded action from the USAO was when a citizen shot a car thief.

Why doesn't anyone try to stop these criminals? Because the leadership in D.C. hasn't created a society that's a free for all with no rules. It's created a society where criminals are allowed to do whatever they like, but law abiding citizens are going to have the hammer brought down on them if they ever dare to fight back.

You're allowed to defend yourself with reasonable force. You can't execute someone running away from you. Be reasonable.

If the person running away is a thief they should be apprehended by whatever means necessary.

Only if they are a fleeing felon or are a threat to the community.

Losing a bag full of soap is not a felony nor is it a threat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Police officers tried to pull over a guy who was on probation with an ankle monitor and high on drugs. He ran off, they followed, he drove into a car and was killed, the police were convicted of murder. The judge in the case said the jury wasn't allowed to know the guy who ran off had an ankle monitor on and drugs in his system:

https://dcist.com/story/23/05/18/karen-hylton-charged-courtroom-reaction-sutton-verdict/

The only crime this year where Councilmembers Parker and Frumin got outraged and demanded action from the USAO was when a citizen shot a car thief.

Why doesn't anyone try to stop these criminals? Because the leadership in D.C. hasn't created a society that's a free for all with no rules. It's created a society where criminals are allowed to do whatever they like, but law abiding citizens are going to have the hammer brought down on them if they ever dare to fight back.

You're allowed to defend yourself with reasonable force. You can't execute someone running away from you. Be reasonable.

If the person running away is a thief they should be apprehended by whatever means necessary.

You act like CVS is not a billion dollar conglomerate. Could you imagine if FEDEx field did not hire it's own security.

They need to hire security.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If someone is regularly stealing from stores it’s not costing them $336.

There's a sub on a site that rhymes with edit where a bunch of people think it doesn't matter "because stores have insurance" - ignoring that most commercial insurance doesn't cover shoplifting, and when they do, there's typically a huge deductible that the store still has to eat, and when they make a claim, their premiums rise astronomically.

Anonymous wrote:Police officers tried to pull over a guy who was on probation with an ankle monitor and high on drugs. He ran off, they followed, he drove into a car and was killed, the police were convicted of murder. The judge in the case said the jury wasn't allowed to know the guy who ran off had an ankle monitor on and drugs in his system:

https://dcist.com/story/23/05/18/karen-hylton-charged-courtroom-reaction-sutton-verdict/

The only crime this year where Councilmembers Parker and Frumin got outraged and demanded action from the USAO was when a citizen shot a car thief.

Why doesn't anyone try to stop these criminals? Because the leadership in D.C. hasn't created a society that's a free for all with no rules. It's created a society where criminals are allowed to do whatever they like, but law abiding citizens are going to have the hammer brought down on them if they ever dare to fight back.

Rather than complaining anonymously on a message board maybe you should be voicing your opinions at council meetings, protesting the council members and organizing candidates to run against them.

Anonymous wrote:

If someone is regularly stealing from stores it’s not costing them $336.

Anonymous wrote:Instacart and Amazon only for me now.

Except your packages will be stolen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can’t retailer staff use tasers on these organized criminals?

lol @ expecting retail workers making $11/hour to engage with violent criminals.

+1. lol

Anonymous wrote:How do we get rid of Frumin?

Vote for someone else?

How do we get rid of Frumin?