Anonymous wrote:We’ve said this many times. It doesn’t matter where you go to school if you are charismatic, a hard worker and can network. My husband is one of those people. You never heard of his college. He’s a people person and thrives in social business meetings over dinner or drinks.
He is every bit as smart as me even though he went to a community college and a no name school. You heard of my college. No one asks either of us where we went to college now. No one cares about your degree after your first job.
Anonymous wrote:Life is about the hustle. You have to hustle to get anywhere in life. Even going to a top school, you have to hustle. No one gives you anything in life.
My husband owns a company and no longer like to hire from MIT or other top engineering schools because the student are quick to tell you where they went to school but don’t actually work much. The ego and entitlement make them difficult teammates and employees. He would rather hire a hard worker from a second tier university.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It also turns out that no one in the real world cares about where your kids are going to school. Do you think that the top companies in Wherever do recruits from University of Wherever? They do. There are smart kids everywhere.
Not true. At all. Nice try though. Kids from University of Wherever may get jobs at top companies but it’s through connections, not recruitment efforts by the top company. If you are unconnected and not #1 at University of Wherever, it’s pretty hard to get a job at a top company.
Anonymous wrote:Just because a kid is at school ranked 200, it doesn't mean that they didn't work as hard as your son. There are tons of other factors at play in where a kid chooses to attend school.
Sounds like your son has "pick me" energy and needs to work on that.
Anonymous wrote:As someone who hires interns, I’d much rather hire a kid from a lesser ranked school, who actually had to work and hustle, than some entitled brat who thinks just because he’s at big name school, I should hire him…
Anonymous wrote:Maybe your kid doesn't come off well in interviews. Also, academic success does not equate with professional success if you don't have the interpersonal skills. Consider that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is at a top 25 school. He went through the summer internship interview process last year but didn’t land an internship with any of the prestigious employers people talk about here - banks, asset managers, consulting, etc. His school is so bloody competitive and there are so many hard driving and high achieving kids and, I guess, only this many spots at these firms per school. Kid has been pretty devastated.
But what has made it worse is seeing kids from lower ranked schools on LinkedIn, think 150+, who end up with internships at such places! I realise how this comes off but it is deeply upsetting when kid had to work SO hard to get into a top school and then see kids who have worked less hard, coming from schools with 80%+ acceptance rates, end up with opportunities that we have been told are easier to get as top school grads.
Kid just feels, what was the point of busting his behind so hard, he could have taken it easier, enjoyed high school a bit more, could have gone to a lower ranked school and still ended up at BlackRock or JP Morgan or Bain. And, of course, I haven’t shared this with him, but I’ve started feeling the same way.
Can you wrap your mind around the proposition that students at lower ranked schools also work hard?
There are a lot of assumptions in these two sentences.
Not OP. Can you in all honesty say that the AVERAGE kid at a 150+ school has worked as hard in high school as the AVERAGE kid at Princeton or MIT?? I think not but I’d be happy for people to prove me wrong.
- Grad of 150+ school who remembers what his average classmates were like
Are the average kids at the 150+ school the ones who are getting the interviews and internships that OP is complaining about?
Consider the top students at a school like Alabama, where there are, numerically, more NMFs than at most elite colleges. Obviously they are not "average" within their university and are likely, by correlation, to possess many qualities that employers may be looking for.
+1 This is what OP is missing - there are top kids at every university, and mediocre kids at top universities. Getting into MIT means nothing if DC is barely making a 2.8 GPA there. Having a 4.0 at VCU with published peer-reviewed articles will get DC an interview at most places. Of course, connected kids at both MIT and VCU get interviews too, no matter what their GPA is.