Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please remember in your analysis that non white does not equal poor. A non-white UMC student may not feel as comfortable at Banneker as a non-white middle or lower-middle class student. I am black UMC. I would consider sending my kid to Basis but not Banneker.
Uh, I know quite a few black UMC kids at Banneker. The school population is 27% at-risk and also high-achieving. I think it is a real misunderstanding of the school (and a disservice to your kid!) to think that a black UMC kid might not feel comfortable.
It's still a Title 1 school so people have certain perceptions. Banneker is ole-school strict and that's not a fit for a lot of people. That's the #1 complaint from the kids. My kid probably would have whined more than usual about itIt will be interesting to see how they fill the school.
If the kid is coming from BASIS, old school strict probably is something they're used to.
Not this type of ole school---Think basketball shorts are too short![]()
Anonymous wrote:
Latest data has white population at basis at 51 percent…eyeball test indicates more like 60 percent plus
quote=Anonymous]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just go ahead & say it. White students have historically avoided Banneker. Many more white students in this freshman class tho.
Plenty of non-white kids at Basis.
In comparison to the rest of the city including charter schools? WTF are you talking about? 46.4% White, 25.8% Black, 7.2% Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.9% Hispanic/Latino, 0.2% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 0% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.
Anonymous wrote:
Latest data has white population at basis at 51 percent…eyeball test indicates more like 60 percent plus
quote=Anonymous]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just go ahead & say it. White students have historically avoided Banneker. Many more white students in this freshman class tho.
Plenty of non-white kids at Basis.
In comparison to the rest of the city including charter schools? WTF are you talking about? 46.4% White, 25.8% Black, 7.2% Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.9% Hispanic/Latino, 0.2% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 0% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just go ahead & say it. White students have historically avoided Banneker. Many more white students in this freshman class tho.
Plenty of non-white kids at Basis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please remember in your analysis that non white does not equal poor. A non-white UMC student may not feel as comfortable at Banneker as a non-white middle or lower-middle class student. I am black UMC. I would consider sending my kid to Basis but not Banneker.
Uh, I know quite a few black UMC kids at Banneker. The school population is 27% at-risk and also high-achieving. I think it is a real misunderstanding of the school (and a disservice to your kid!) to think that a black UMC kid might not feel comfortable.
It's still a Title 1 school so people have certain perceptions. Banneker is ole-school strict and that's not a fit for a lot of people. That's the #1 complaint from the kids. My kid probably would have whined more than usual about itIt will be interesting to see how they fill the school.
If the kid is coming from BASIS, old school strict probably is something they're used to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please remember in your analysis that non white does not equal poor. A non-white UMC student may not feel as comfortable at Banneker as a non-white middle or lower-middle class student. I am black UMC. I would consider sending my kid to Basis but not Banneker.
Uh, I know quite a few black UMC kids at Banneker. The school population is 27% at-risk and also high-achieving. I think it is a real misunderstanding of the school (and a disservice to your kid!) to think that a black UMC kid might not feel comfortable.
It's still a Title 1 school so people have certain perceptions. Banneker is ole-school strict and that's not a fit for a lot of people. That's the #1 complaint from the kids. My kid probably would have whined more than usual about itIt will be interesting to see how they fill the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please remember in your analysis that non white does not equal poor. A non-white UMC student may not feel as comfortable at Banneker as a non-white middle or lower-middle class student. I am black UMC. I would consider sending my kid to Basis but not Banneker.
Uh, I know quite a few black UMC kids at Banneker. The school population is 27% at-risk and also high-achieving. I think it is a real misunderstanding of the school (and a disservice to your kid!) to think that a black UMC kid might not feel comfortable.
It will be interesting to see how they fill the school. Anonymous wrote:Please remember in your analysis that non white does not equal poor. A non-white UMC student may not feel as comfortable at Banneker as a non-white middle or lower-middle class student. I am black UMC. I would consider sending my kid to Basis but not Banneker.
Anonymous wrote:Please remember in your analysis that non white does not equal poor. A non-white UMC student may not feel as comfortable at Banneker as a non-white middle or lower-middle class student. I am black UMC. I would consider sending my kid to Basis but not Banneker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just go ahead & say it. White students have historically avoided Banneker. Many more white students in this freshman class tho.
Plenty of non-white kids at Basis.
Plenty of non-white UMC kids at BASIS, not so many poors.