Anonymous wrote:
Our family income is well above the median household income and we are both well educated, yet could not afford in McLean or Langley and lately all I'm seeing for SFHs in Oakton are tear downs for 850k (our budget is slightly higher currently, with mortgage rates as they are). Could it really be that the only reliably good public schools are in such wealthy districts?
Anonymous wrote:Teacher here. I don’t think AAP is going away, but I do think centers will eventually. The whole plan is to have every ES offer it and they are getting close to that goal. There will be no need for centers if services can be at the base school.
Anonymous wrote:We are going to enroll DC in public school starting in Jan (first grade) and I'm looking for advice on how to navigate this as it relates to levels 2, 3, 4. So far I only have outsider knowledge. DC has been in private preschools/schools til now. Any advice on how to ensure DC gets needed services right away? DC is a fluent reader and advanced in math.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher here. I don’t think AAP is going away, but I do think centers will eventually. The whole plan is to have every ES offer it and they are getting close to that goal. There will be no need for centers if services can be at the base school.
That's the obvious plan, and in some places it's working as parents choose the base school over transferring to the center. But in other places, the centers remain the first choice for families. Rather than phasing out center schools altogether, the county is creating a dual system with some areas having robust centers and other areas having no centers. I wonder how long that will last.
Anonymous wrote:In California, the democrats banned children below 9th grade from taking algebra prior to 9th grade in public school:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/10/california-math-framework-algebra/675509/
The radical progressives who dominate the current school board share the same educational philosophies of their west-coast counterparts.
If democrats are again voted into a majority on the FCPS school board, there is very little chance AAP will survive for much longer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a lot of gossip about AAP being "dismantled". We are looking for a house and had hoped DC might get into AAP.
If there's no more AAP, what happens to the quality of instruction at the local and center schools?
With or without AAP, there will be substantial number of students who will exhaust all honors courses and go on to pursue dual enrollment courses. It's foolish for equity crazies to go after AAP/TJ, with the hope of stopping the top students from learning more. FCPS does not control what the student learns, students do. Unless they can somehow eliminate every available learning resource outside school, such as banning Khan Academy or restrict access to libraries or similar nonsense, the idea of constraining an advanced student's learning remains wishful thinking.
If you are looking for house, safe bet would be McLean, Langley, or Oakton attendance boundaries.
Our family income is well above the median household income and we are both well educated, yet could not afford in McLean or Langley and lately all I'm seeing for SFHs in Oakton are tear downs for 850k (our budget is slightly higher currently, with mortgage rates as they are). Could it really be that the only reliably good public schools are in such wealthy districts?
You need to get a good realtor. We are inlower than median household income, and we chose a Langley neighborhood. For us our kids education is a priority over a lavish house. Ymmv.
I am the same (or similar) but could not buy a shack in Langley in order to get into that pyramid. Besides, do you really think the academics are superior? How much is really the school vs your influence?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've seen some 'gossip' on this site only about this over the past few weeks and it 100% feels like political astroturfers trying to get their far right school board nominees elected. It's not real, no one is trying to get rid of AAP. They CAN'T get rid of AAP without a replacement because it fills a statutory need.
AAP has already been eliminated plenty of places, especially in urban school districts (like DC) where it is viewed as non-inclusive and increasing the learning gap.
There was even an episode of Abbott Elementary that talked about this, and fully argued against G&T programs because they only benefit kids who are already doing well.
I'm not even sure I have an opinion on any of this, except for the fact that we currently live in a district with no AAP, but will be moving to an area with AAP at the end of elementary, and it causes me anxiety because I worry about my kid getting left behind without access to AAP earlier. So I'm extra aware of the debate over it and school districts are divided on the matter.
Anonymous wrote:Teacher here. I don’t think AAP is going away, but I do think centers will eventually. The whole plan is to have every ES offer it and they are getting close to that goal. There will be no need for centers if services can be at the base school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a lot of gossip about AAP being "dismantled". We are looking for a house and had hoped DC might get into AAP.
If there's no more AAP, what happens to the quality of instruction at the local and center schools?
With or without AAP, there will be substantial number of students who will exhaust all honors courses and go on to pursue dual enrollment courses. It's foolish for equity crazies to go after AAP/TJ, with the hope of stopping the top students from learning more. FCPS does not control what the student learns, students do. Unless they can somehow eliminate every available learning resource outside school, such as banning Khan Academy or restrict access to libraries or similar nonsense, the idea of constraining an advanced student's learning remains wishful thinking.
If you are looking for house, safe bet would be McLean, Langley, or Oakton attendance boundaries.
Our family income is well above the median household income and we are both well educated, yet could not afford in McLean or Langley and lately all I'm seeing for SFHs in Oakton are tear downs for 850k (our budget is slightly higher currently, with mortgage rates as they are). Could it really be that the only reliably good public schools are in such wealthy districts?
You need to get a good realtor. We are inlower than median household income, and we chose a Langley neighborhood. For us our kids education is a priority over a lavish house. Ymmv.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a lot of gossip about AAP being "dismantled". We are looking for a house and had hoped DC might get into AAP.
If there's no more AAP, what happens to the quality of instruction at the local and center schools?
With or without AAP, there will be substantial number of students who will exhaust all honors courses and go on to pursue dual enrollment courses. It's foolish for equity crazies to go after AAP/TJ, with the hope of stopping the top students from learning more. FCPS does not control what the student learns, students do. Unless they can somehow eliminate every available learning resource outside school, such as banning Khan Academy or restrict access to libraries or similar nonsense, the idea of constraining an advanced student's learning remains wishful thinking.
If you are looking for house, safe bet would be McLean, Langley, or Oakton attendance boundaries.
Our family income is well above the median household income and we are both well educated, yet could not afford in McLean or Langley and lately all I'm seeing for SFHs in Oakton are tear downs for 850k (our budget is slightly higher currently, with mortgage rates as they are). Could it really be that the only reliably good public schools are in such wealthy districts?
You need to get a good realtor. We are inlower than median household income, and we chose a Langley neighborhood. For us our kids education is a priority over a lavish house. Ymmv.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a lot of gossip about AAP being "dismantled". We are looking for a house and had hoped DC might get into AAP.
If there's no more AAP, what happens to the quality of instruction at the local and center schools?
With or without AAP, there will be substantial number of students who will exhaust all honors courses and go on to pursue dual enrollment courses. It's foolish for equity crazies to go after AAP/TJ, with the hope of stopping the top students from learning more. FCPS does not control what the student learns, students do. Unless they can somehow eliminate every available learning resource outside school, such as banning Khan Academy or restrict access to libraries or similar nonsense, the idea of constraining an advanced student's learning remains wishful thinking.
If you are looking for house, safe bet would be McLean, Langley, or Oakton attendance boundaries.
Our family income is well above the median household income and we are both well educated, yet could not afford in McLean or Langley and lately all I'm seeing for SFHs in Oakton are tear downs for 850k (our budget is slightly higher currently, with mortgage rates as they are). Could it really be that the only reliably good public schools are in such wealthy districts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a lot of gossip about AAP being "dismantled". We are looking for a house and had hoped DC might get into AAP.
If there's no more AAP, what happens to the quality of instruction at the local and center schools?
With or without AAP, there will be substantial number of students who will exhaust all honors courses and go on to pursue dual enrollment courses. It's foolish for equity crazies to go after AAP/TJ, with the hope of stopping the top students from learning more. FCPS does not control what the student learns, students do. Unless they can somehow eliminate every available learning resource outside school, such as banning Khan Academy or restrict access to libraries or similar nonsense, the idea of constraining an advanced student's learning remains wishful thinking.
If you are looking for house, safe bet would be McLean, Langley, or Oakton attendance boundaries.
Our family income is well above the median household income and we are both well educated, yet could not afford in McLean or Langley and lately all I'm seeing for SFHs in Oakton are tear downs for 850k (our budget is slightly higher currently, with mortgage rates as they are). Could it really be that the only reliably good public schools are in such wealthy districts?