Anonymous wrote:Well raise them with common sense, teach them safety measures, give them safety gadgets and wish for the best. You CAN send them to local community college in suburb and still not keep safe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well raise them with common sense, teach them safety measures, give them safety gadgets and wish for the best. You CAN send them to local community college in suburb and still not keep safe.
Or you can send them to Columbia and they get stabbed in the park by a 14 yr old.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If campus itself was otherwise very safe?
No
Both of my kids attended colleges that were in urban areas next to "not so safe areas". It is fine, your kid just needs to be aware of this. In fact in some ways they are more aware of issues than kids on a suburban/rural campus, who "think it's safer" but isn't really.
+ 1 , same here
Anonymous wrote:Well raise them with common sense, teach them safety measures, give them safety gadgets and wish for the best. You CAN send them to local community college in suburb and still not keep safe.
Anonymous wrote:There are lots of colleges in great neighborhoods. Why pick one in a crappy neighborhood? College students have enough to worry about already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would.
Many schools cheat on their Cleary reporting of on-campus crime as required by the federal government.
Would probably help if you named the schools ? (Drexel ? Temple ? U Penn ?)
Hmmm, no cheating here. I guess I'd forgotten when I said campus was safe: they've had an issue with sexual assaults involving students. Just nothing spilling over from town is what is what meant.
Sounds like Bates College in Lewiston, Maine:
https://thebatesstudent.com/22327/forum/anonymous-app-exposes-sexual-assault-on-campus/
https://wcyy.com/the-10-most-dangerous-places-to-live-in-maine-right-now/
Not Bates. But really, do specifics matter?
They do to parents & students considering that school.
Anonymous wrote:We turned down John's Hopkins for this reason
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would.
Many schools cheat on their Cleary reporting of on-campus crime as required by the federal government.
Would probably help if you named the schools ? (Drexel ? Temple ? U Penn ?)
Hmmm, no cheating here. I guess I'd forgotten when I said campus was safe: they've had an issue with sexual assaults involving students. Just nothing spilling over from town is what is what meant.
Anonymous wrote:It's definitely a negative. Johns Hopkins, Yale, and Chicago are obviously great schools. But you need to keep your head on a swivel whenever you leave campus. It's unfortunate. It's stressful. I wouldn't nix those schools however, unless the kid had a particularly anxious disposition or was unusually oblivious to their surroundings. A great education is a great education. For lesser ranked schools - say Temple or Fordham - forget about it. There are more than 3000 colleges in the US. Why put up with the crime when there are so many alternatives?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If campus itself was otherwise very safe?
No
Both of my kids attended colleges that were in urban areas next to "not so safe areas". It is fine, your kid just needs to be aware of this. In fact in some ways they are more aware of issues than kids on a suburban/rural campus, who "think it's safer" but isn't really.