Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
Actually the compensation is just ok, especially for the amount of hours most work. They are going to lose a lot of good people.
+1. The compensation is not great right now and a lot of people took huge paycuts with low stock prices. Layoffs mean those who are there are being asked to do more with less. I assure you, they've been humbled.
I'm a manager at Amazon and basically just tell people to get those badge swipes even if they go in, get a coffee and leave. We are spread out across the country so there is no team to work with and it's a distracting environment with terrible wifi.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
Whose rules?
And have you always been a sheep?
I guess Amazon’s. They told you to RTO 3days/week. Apparently, some think they can look the other way without consequence. I guess they’re about to find out if giving the middle finger to their paycheck is a good idea.
They should all stand together and not come in and see if they'll really be fired.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
Whose rules?
And have you always been a sheep?
I guess Amazon’s. They told you to RTO 3days/week. Apparently, some think they can look the other way without consequence. I guess they’re about to find out if giving the middle finger to their paycheck is a good idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
Whose rules?
And have you always been a sheep?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
So, you're jealous?
This is a common, overused retort by the chronic WFH/remote work promoters.
Jealousy means you want it too. I don’t want it.
What I want is a functioning workplace where everyone is accountable and carries their weight. I’m not going to get into a food fight about the productivity and availability of those who WFH, but it’s lacking relative to in-office peers. Thus, the frustration is not jealousy, but justice. I’m tired of co-workers half-a$$ing their job, getting paid obnoxiously well, and leaving their work for others. If the WFH crowd has suddenly discovered that the meaning of life is to screw their employers and peers and dig ever deeper into the pay/benefits cookie jar, then I support their dismissal. They’re no longer a team player and shouldn’t enjoy the fruits the team produces.
I could say the same about people with kids who think the world revolves around their kids schedules - and everyone without kids should be picking up the slack when they dart out the door at 4:45 regardless of what's going on.
I may leave at 4:45pm (or, gasp, sometimes 3:45pm) but I log back on at 8:30pm because I am ambitious in my career. I support RTO but that does not mean I want to be subject to copious amounts of face time.
And someone on here will come and lecture you: "Just be aware, people who leave before 7 PM aren't going to be looked at when it comes to promotions. Of course you log back in at 8:30. We all do that."
Just like they say "Just be aware, people who work from home will never be promoted. They want people who actually make the effort to come to the office." And there was recently a "Just be aware, people who keep their cameras turned off will never be promoted compared to the cameras on."
Everyone should do what works for them and find an employer that has the desired flexibility or in-office culture that you want.
The essence of all those “just be aware” comments is that managers promote engaged, committed workers. If at every turn you’re trying to find a new way to slack, don’t expect good things to come your way. It’s totally common sense, but some people think their mere presence is sufficient for a promotion. I wish these people would just quit.
Anonymous wrote:Slackers are slackers no matter what.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
So, you're jealous?
This is a common, overused retort by the chronic WFH/remote work promoters.
Jealousy means you want it too. I don’t want it.
What I want is a functioning workplace where everyone is accountable and carries their weight. I’m not going to get into a food fight about the productivity and availability of those who WFH, but it’s lacking relative to in-office peers. Thus, the frustration is not jealousy, but justice. I’m tired of co-workers half-a$$ing their job, getting paid obnoxiously well, and leaving their work for others. If the WFH crowd has suddenly discovered that the meaning of life is to screw their employers and peers and dig ever deeper into the pay/benefits cookie jar, then I support their dismissal. They’re no longer a team player and shouldn’t enjoy the fruits the team produces.
I could say the same about people with kids who think the world revolves around their kids schedules - and everyone without kids should be picking up the slack when they dart out the door at 4:45 regardless of what's going on.
I may leave at 4:45pm (or, gasp, sometimes 3:45pm) but I log back on at 8:30pm because I am ambitious in my career. I support RTO but that does not mean I want to be subject to copious amounts of face time.
And someone on here will come and lecture you: "Just be aware, people who leave before 7 PM aren't going to be looked at when it comes to promotions. Of course you log back in at 8:30. We all do that."
Just like they say "Just be aware, people who work from home will never be promoted. They want people who actually make the effort to come to the office." And there was recently a "Just be aware, people who keep their cameras turned off will never be promoted compared to the cameras on."
Everyone should do what works for them and find an employer that has the desired flexibility or in-office culture that you want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
So, you're jealous?
This is a common, overused retort by the chronic WFH/remote work promoters.
Jealousy means you want it too. I don’t want it.
What I want is a functioning workplace where everyone is accountable and carries their weight. I’m not going to get into a food fight about the productivity and availability of those who WFH, but it’s lacking relative to in-office peers. Thus, the frustration is not jealousy, but justice. I’m tired of co-workers half-a$$ing their job, getting paid obnoxiously well, and leaving their work for others. If the WFH crowd has suddenly discovered that the meaning of life is to screw their employers and peers and dig ever deeper into the pay/benefits cookie jar, then I support their dismissal. They’re no longer a team player and shouldn’t enjoy the fruits the team produces.
I could say the same about people with kids who think the world revolves around their kids schedules - and everyone without kids should be picking up the slack when they dart out the door at 4:45 regardless of what's going on.
I may leave at 4:45pm (or, gasp, sometimes 3:45pm) but I log back on at 8:30pm because I am ambitious in my career. I support RTO but that does not mean I want to be subject to copious amounts of face time.
And someone on here will come and lecture you: "Just be aware, people who leave before 7 PM aren't going to be looked at when it comes to promotions. Of course you log back in at 8:30. We all do that."
Just like they say "Just be aware, people who work from home will never be promoted. They want people who actually make the effort to come to the office." And there was recently a "Just be aware, people who keep their cameras turned off will never be promoted compared to the cameras on."
Everyone should do what works for them and find an employer that has the desired flexibility or in-office culture that you want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon just gave its managers authority to fire workers who won’t RTO 3 days/week. It’s about time.
Why do you care about Amazon? Do you work there or something?
Don’t work there. It’s just an example of a company that pays great overall compensation, yet many workers seem to take it for granted. Same for other FANG and similar jobs. The people who work these jobs seem to think they’re a special class to whom the rules don’t apply. It’s time they’re humbled.
So, you're jealous?
This is a common, overused retort by the chronic WFH/remote work promoters.
Jealousy means you want it too. I don’t want it.
What I want is a functioning workplace where everyone is accountable and carries their weight. I’m not going to get into a food fight about the productivity and availability of those who WFH, but it’s lacking relative to in-office peers. Thus, the frustration is not jealousy, but justice. I’m tired of co-workers half-a$$ing their job, getting paid obnoxiously well, and leaving their work for others. If the WFH crowd has suddenly discovered that the meaning of life is to screw their employers and peers and dig ever deeper into the pay/benefits cookie jar, then I support their dismissal. They’re no longer a team player and shouldn’t enjoy the fruits the team produces.
I could say the same about people with kids who think the world revolves around their kids schedules - and everyone without kids should be picking up the slack when they dart out the door at 4:45 regardless of what's going on.
I may leave at 4:45pm (or, gasp, sometimes 3:45pm) but I log back on at 8:30pm because I am ambitious in my career. I support RTO but that does not mean I want to be subject to copious amounts of face time.