Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read about this and was disgusted by it. His sentence was ridiculously light.

He should have been tried as an adult. He did some pretty heinous crimes.

I hope this guy gets expelled if he is in school. No one should have to go to school with someone like that.

I hope Arlington, VA gets blasted in the national news for this too.

Groping = “heinous”?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - I think you are seeing why crime in the DMV is hard to control right now.

We have people here who think that a 17 YO who sexually assaulted numerous women should get a light sentence because he is just a kid and needs reforming.......

So, you are getting an idea who are voting in the prosecutors and others who are responsible for sentencing and enforcing our laws.
It explains a lot.

They want "criminal justice reform." That is, until the criminal comes for them.

What do you think is an appropriate sentence for a minor who groped someone?

Anonymous wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/nova/comments/17b4s4b/final_update_sexually_assaulted_in_courthouse/

OP was sexually assaulted by a stranger while walking her dog. Turns out the Arlington police caught the guy and he was a 17 y/o HS student. He was convicted on additional sexual assaults on strangers in the area AND recorded ALL of them! Despite all of this, he was sentenced to 10 days in juvie, 80 additional days suspended, and a sex offender treatment program. No SO registry. He will be back at HS after he finishes his juvenile sentence.

They’re going to let this guy off with a slap on the wrist and he’s going to offend again worse and more innocent women will be victimized.

Anonymous wrote:OP - I think you are seeing why crime in the DMV is hard to control right now.

We have people here who think that a 17 YO who sexually assaulted numerous women should get a light sentence because he is just a kid and needs reforming.......

So, you are getting an idea who are voting in the prosecutors and others who are responsible for sentencing and enforcing our laws.
It explains a lot.

They want "criminal justice reform." That is, until the criminal comes for them.

Anonymous wrote:Next time OP gets a speeding ticket I think she should be imprisoned for 25 years because it could have been a dui vehicular homicide

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These light (or even nonexistent) sentences are what the voters of Arlington have signaled they want through their choices on Election Day. Not changing anytime soon.

Yep. You broke it. You own it.

OK. This seems like a reasonable sentence to me. Next?

Is it going to seem like a “reasonable sentence” when he starts victimizing more women after his light vacation in juvie when he’s 18-20? Or just if he engages in some light groping, that’s ok, but if/when he escalates to armed assault or rape, then it’ll be “oh no how could this happen??!??” What about if he starts posting his videos on sketchy websites for other guys to get off to or get inspiration from?

Also something tells me if this guy was harming animals people would be screaming to throw the book at him because it always escalates to more abuse. But harming women? It’s alright, he’s “just a kid.”

So your panties are in a bunch because he MIGHT do something in the future? You want to lock him away for years for grabbing her crotch (over pants)? GMAFB.

Yeah, these hysterical women sure have their "panties in a bunch." What's the big deal about grabbing crotches and filming seven women? Boys will be boys!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These light (or even nonexistent) sentences are what the voters of Arlington have signaled they want through their choices on Election Day. Not changing anytime soon.

Yep. You broke it. You own it.

OK. This seems like a reasonable sentence to me. Next?

Is it going to seem like a “reasonable sentence” when he starts victimizing more women after his light vacation in juvie when he’s 18-20? Or just if he engages in some light groping, that’s ok, but if/when he escalates to armed assault or rape, then it’ll be “oh no how could this happen??!??” What about if he starts posting his videos on sketchy websites for other guys to get off to or get inspiration from?

Also something tells me if this guy was harming animals people would be screaming to throw the book at him because it always escalates to more abuse. But harming women? It’s alright, he’s “just a kid.”

So your panties are in a bunch because he MIGHT do something in the future? You want to lock him away for years for grabbing her crotch (over pants)? GMAFB.

Yeah, these hysterical women sure have their "panties in a bunch." What's the big deal about grabbing crotches and filming seven women? Boys will be boys!

Anonymous wrote:These light (or even nonexistent) sentences are what the voters of Arlington have signaled they want through their choices on Election Day. Not changing anytime soon.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These light (or even nonexistent) sentences are what the voters of Arlington have signaled they want through their choices on Election Day. Not changing anytime soon.

Yep. You broke it. You own it.

OK. This seems like a reasonable sentence to me. Next?

Is it going to seem like a “reasonable sentence” when he starts victimizing more women after his light vacation in juvie when he’s 18-20? Or just if he engages in some light groping, that’s ok, but if/when he escalates to armed assault or rape, then it’ll be “oh no how could this happen??!??” What about if he starts posting his videos on sketchy websites for other guys to get off to or get inspiration from?

Also something tells me if this guy was harming animals people would be screaming to throw the book at him because it always escalates to more abuse. But harming women? It’s alright, he’s “just a kid.”

Clearly Arlington voters disagree. When you elect prosecutors who think criminals are victims of the justice system, these sentences are what you get. I would hope the victim would sue him just so that his name will be forever in the public record

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These light (or even nonexistent) sentences are what the voters of Arlington have signaled they want through their choices on Election Day. Not changing anytime soon.

Yep. You broke it. You own it.

OK. This seems like a reasonable sentence to me. Next?

Is it going to seem like a “reasonable sentence” when he starts victimizing more women after his light vacation in juvie when he’s 18-20? Or just if he engages in some light groping, that’s ok, but if/when he escalates to armed assault or rape, then it’ll be “oh no how could this happen??!??” What about if he starts posting his videos on sketchy websites for other guys to get off to or get inspiration from?

Also something tells me if this guy was harming animals people would be screaming to throw the book at him because it always escalates to more abuse. But harming women? It’s alright, he’s “just a kid.”

So your panties are in a bunch because he MIGHT do something in the future? You want to lock him away for years for grabbing her crotch (over pants)? GMAFB.

Anonymous wrote:I read about this and was disgusted by it. His sentence was ridiculously light.

He should have been tried as an adult. He did some pretty heinous crimes.

I hope this guy gets expelled if he is in school. No one should have to go to school with someone like that.

I hope Arlington, VA gets blasted in the national news for this too.

Anonymous wrote:Do you want your daughter to be in the same school as he is and have classes with him?

I wouldn't. Hell, I wouldn't want to be his teacher.

This sentence is far too light.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These light (or even nonexistent) sentences are what the voters of Arlington have signaled they want through their choices on Election Day. Not changing anytime soon.

Yep. You broke it. You own it.

OK. This seems like a reasonable sentence to me. Next?

Is it going to seem like a “reasonable sentence” when he starts victimizing more women after his light vacation in juvie when he’s 18-20? Or just if he engages in some light groping, that’s ok, but if/when he escalates to armed assault or rape, then it’ll be “oh no how could this happen??!??” What about if he starts posting his videos on sketchy websites for other guys to get off to or get inspiration from?

Also something tells me if this guy was harming animals people would be screaming to throw the book at him because it always escalates to more abuse. But harming women? It’s alright, he’s “just a kid.”