Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school changed to a 2-hour delay schedule instead.
How can they do that last minute?
Most of the kids were already there?
Freshman and seniors are not there. That’s 1/2 the school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I’m surprised to see this. The “nationwide issue” was basically server overload of teacher proctors logging in. We’ve had that before with other digital state testing. RM very early on sent teachers a note to just keep refreshing until they got in. We had time built into our schedule anticipating login problems. We also had a homeroom last week to check student devices and do pre-administration, so kids were ready to go. And the staff meeting last week was the online training, so everyone had been verified to be ready. As soon as refreshing got the proctors in to advance the students to start testing, the kids had no issues. I think our room was delayed by only ~15 min with the time outs.
RM has more competent administrators than others. Well done!
Anonymous wrote:Poolesville is ok. Just received a message.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, I’m surprised to see this. The “nationwide issue” was basically server overload of teacher proctors logging in. We’ve had that before with other digital state testing. RM very early on sent teachers a note to just keep refreshing until they got in. We had time built into our schedule anticipating login problems. We also had a homeroom last week to check student devices and do pre-administration, so kids were ready to go. And the staff meeting last week was the online training, so everyone had been verified to be ready. As soon as refreshing got the proctors in to advance the students to start testing, the kids had no issues. I think our room was delayed by only ~15 min with the time outs.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, I’m surprised to see this. The “nationwide issue” was basically server overload of teacher proctors logging in. We’ve had that before with other digital state testing. RM very early on sent teachers a note to just keep refreshing until they got in. We had time built into our schedule anticipating login problems. We also had a homeroom last week to check student devices and do pre-administration, so kids were ready to go. And the staff meeting last week was the online training, so everyone had been verified to be ready. As soon as refreshing got the proctors in to advance the students to start testing, the kids had no issues. I think our room was delayed by only ~15 min with the time outs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they cancel across the board? Seems odd to have most cancel but some continue.
That is weird, considering that the Central Office message was that they were stopping all testing and would collaborate with schools to identify another testing date.
What time was that central office message? If a group was successfully testing for a significant period of time, I would suggest that it would be in the students' interests to finish up.
Blake sent a message to parents referencing the central office message at 9:15, but my kid texted at 8:50 saying they had canceled because they were told there were issues nationwide with the platform.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they cancel across the board? Seems odd to have most cancel but some continue.
That is weird, considering that the Central Office message was that they were stopping all testing and would collaborate with schools to identify another testing date.
What time was that central office message? If a group was successfully testing for a significant period of time, I would suggest that it would be in the students' interests to finish up.
Blake sent a message to parents referencing the central office message at 9:15, but my kid texted at 8:50 saying they had canceled because they were told there were issues nationwide with the platform.
Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they cancel across the board? Seems odd to have most cancel but some continue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they cancel across the board? Seems odd to have most cancel but some continue.
That is weird, considering that the Central Office message was that they were stopping all testing and would collaborate with schools to identify another testing date.
What time was that central office message? If a group was successfully testing for a significant period of time, I would suggest that it would be in the students' interests to finish up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they cancel across the board? Seems odd to have most cancel but some continue.
That is weird, considering that the Central Office message was that they were stopping all testing and would collaborate with schools to identify another testing date.
Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they cancel across the board? Seems odd to have most cancel but some continue.