Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Patrick Murphy wanted me to ask if y'all missed him yet?
Him, no. His competent staff, yes.
People may not have liked Chadwick or Tara Nattrass; but they knew what they were doing and worked together like adults.
Are you KIDDING me? You thought Chadwick and Nattrass were good? Oy.
As I said, people may not have liked them, but yes they did know what they were doing and the departments worked together. Just because you don't like what they proposed or did does not mean they weren't competent. Duran's staff has expanded too broadly, is full of incompetence and/or laziness, and the departments not only do not work together - some refuse to work with the other departments or coordinate anything.
which depts refuse to work with each other?
I'd say just about all of them, from it looks like from the outside.
Nobody knows what DEI office does/is doing/is supposed to do, including people I know in the other Syphax departments.
As evidenced by the school boundary delay because of some big plan the academics department was unveiling, I'd say academics and planning and eval are not in sync. Looks like Planning and Eval was moving along with what they were supposed to be doing but Academics took a year to come up with - what? - essentially the same thing we have now but throw in some additional middle school extensions of the high school programs and not even suggest where they would be located. And where is facilities and transportation? Everyone was demanding a list of schools needing renovation when the planning department was considering using NES as swing space. So where was Facilities and Operations' list?
Regardless of what people thought about the previous admin with Chadwick, Nattrass, Stengle; they all at least seemed to talk with each other and work with each other to come up with their plans together rather than all this piecemeal nonsense that gets interrupted for another piece that then goes nowhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Patrick Murphy wanted me to ask if y'all missed him yet?
Him, no. His competent staff, yes.
People may not have liked Chadwick or Tara Nattrass; but they knew what they were doing and worked together like adults.
Are you KIDDING me? You thought Chadwick and Nattrass were good? Oy.
As I said, people may not have liked them, but yes they did know what they were doing and the departments worked together. Just because you don't like what they proposed or did does not mean they weren't competent. Duran's staff has expanded too broadly, is full of incompetence and/or laziness, and the departments not only do not work together - some refuse to work with the other departments or coordinate anything.
which depts refuse to work with each other?
I'd say just about all of them, from it looks like from the outside.
Nobody knows what DEI office does/is doing/is supposed to do, including people I know in the other Syphax departments.
As evidenced by the school boundary delay because of some big plan the academics department was unveiling, I'd say academics and planning and eval are not in sync. Looks like Planning and Eval was moving along with what they were supposed to be doing but Academics took a year to come up with - what? - essentially the same thing we have now but throw in some additional middle school extensions of the high school programs and not even suggest where they would be located. And where is facilities and transportation? Everyone was demanding a list of schools needing renovation when the planning department was considering using NES as swing space. So where was Facilities and Operations' list?
Regardless of what people thought about the previous admin with Chadwick, Nattrass, Stengle; they all at least seemed to talk with each other and work with each other to come up with their plans together rather than all this piecemeal nonsense that gets interrupted for another piece that then goes nowhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Patrick Murphy wanted me to ask if y'all missed him yet?
Him, no. His competent staff, yes.
People may not have liked Chadwick or Tara Nattrass; but they knew what they were doing and worked together like adults.
Are you KIDDING me? You thought Chadwick and Nattrass were good? Oy.
As I said, people may not have liked them, but yes they did know what they were doing and the departments worked together. Just because you don't like what they proposed or did does not mean they weren't competent. Duran's staff has expanded too broadly, is full of incompetence and/or laziness, and the departments not only do not work together - some refuse to work with the other departments or coordinate anything.
which depts refuse to work with each other?
I'd say just about all of them, from it looks like from the outside.
Nobody knows what DEI office does/is doing/is supposed to do, including people I know in the other Syphax departments.
As evidenced by the school boundary delay because of some big plan the academics department was unveiling, I'd say academics and planning and eval are not in sync. Looks like Planning and Eval was moving along with what they were supposed to be doing but Academics took a year to come up with - what? - essentially the same thing we have now but throw in some additional middle school extensions of the high school programs and not even suggest where they would be located. And where is facilities and transportation? Everyone was demanding a list of schools needing renovation when the planning department was considering using NES as swing space. So where was Facilities and Operations' list?
Regardless of what people thought about the previous admin with Chadwick, Nattrass, Stengle; they all at least seemed to talk with each other and work with each other to come up with their plans together rather than all this piecemeal nonsense that gets interrupted for another piece that then goes nowhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Patrick Murphy wanted me to ask if y'all missed him yet?
Him, no. His competent staff, yes.
People may not have liked Chadwick or Tara Nattrass; but they knew what they were doing and worked together like adults.
Are you KIDDING me? You thought Chadwick and Nattrass were good? Oy.
As I said, people may not have liked them, but yes they did know what they were doing and the departments worked together. Just because you don't like what they proposed or did does not mean they weren't competent. Duran's staff has expanded too broadly, is full of incompetence and/or laziness, and the departments not only do not work together - some refuse to work with the other departments or coordinate anything.
which depts refuse to work with each other?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s my question: where does it end? I mean, for those who support this kind of race based decision making.
What groups are deserving of recognition beyond Hispanic? Are we doing this for every group? Which ones specifically?
Also, my dear friend growing up had a Hispanic last name, whose father came to the US as a lawyer, and who was a National Merit Scholar. S/he was racially white and only had white friends. Is s/he the Hispanic “community” you are seeking to recognize?
I wonder if people like you ever get tired of the lame slippery slope "where does it end" argument.?
Well, because it seems like a valid one? I mean, take APS’ proposed calendar with all the religious holidays. Where do you draw the line? Which religious holidays do you recognize and why? If APS recognizes Group A, then shouldn’t you recognize Group B and C and D? If not, why not? As a community, we have to engage in line drawing which makes me uncomfortable. I would prefer to just trash the religious holidays altogether. For everyone. I don’t see this as a totally different analysis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m part of a minority myself who also has a “month” and consider myself a progressive But I think it’s a bit strange for Dr Duran to honor “Latino Student Leaders.” Something about honoring students on the basis of their race and ethnicity doesn’t sit well with me.
Okay so?
They're Latino STUDENT LEADERS being honored during Hispanic/Latino heritage month. They're not just being honored for being Latino. I'm sure if they have Irish student leaders, they'd also get a shout out during their month.
Find something legitimate to worry about. This is a bad faith argument at its core. This is like if during Black History Month, Duran was honoring Black Civil Rights Activists and all you heard was the black part. It's a descriptor, not a noun.
There is a difference between honoring Black Civil Rights activists whose contributions were ignored, and by honoring Latino student leaders. How does it work exactly? How does APS determine whether a student is Latino given that it’s a cultural/ethnic category?
It's interesting that you seem confused about the demographic information that school collects upon enrollment.
To answer your question, you check a box on the enrollment form.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Patrick Murphy wanted me to ask if y'all missed him yet?
Him, no. His competent staff, yes.
People may not have liked Chadwick or Tara Nattrass; but they knew what they were doing and worked together like adults.
Are you KIDDING me? You thought Chadwick and Nattrass were good? Oy.
As I said, people may not have liked them, but yes they did know what they were doing and the departments worked together. Just because you don't like what they proposed or did does not mean they weren't competent. Duran's staff has expanded too broadly, is full of incompetence and/or laziness, and the departments not only do not work together - some refuse to work with the other departments or coordinate anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m part of a minority myself who also has a “month” and consider myself a progressive But I think it’s a bit strange for Dr Duran to honor “Latino Student Leaders.” Something about honoring students on the basis of their race and ethnicity doesn’t sit well with me.
Okay so?
They're Latino STUDENT LEADERS being honored during Hispanic/Latino heritage month. They're not just being honored for being Latino. I'm sure if they have Irish student leaders, they'd also get a shout out during their month.
Find something legitimate to worry about. This is a bad faith argument at its core. This is like if during Black History Month, Duran was honoring Black Civil Rights Activists and all you heard was the black part. It's a descriptor, not a noun.
I guarantee that APS will not be honoring any "Irish Student Leaders" during Irish heritage month, which is a real thing and is in March.
Probably because Irish Americans don't claim minority status or advocate under the auspices of being an under-represented community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m part of a minority myself who also has a “month” and consider myself a progressive But I think it’s a bit strange for Dr Duran to honor “Latino Student Leaders.” Something about honoring students on the basis of their race and ethnicity doesn’t sit well with me.
Okay so?
They're Latino STUDENT LEADERS being honored during Hispanic/Latino heritage month. They're not just being honored for being Latino. I'm sure if they have Irish student leaders, they'd also get a shout out during their month.
Find something legitimate to worry about. This is a bad faith argument at its core. This is like if during Black History Month, Duran was honoring Black Civil Rights Activists and all you heard was the black part. It's a descriptor, not a noun.
I guarantee that APS will not be honoring any "Irish Student Leaders" during Irish heritage month, which is a real thing and is in March.
Probably because Irish Americans don't claim minority status or advocate under the auspices of being an under-represented community.
Ok, I’ll bite. Which specific groups qualify for the APS minority awards month to you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m part of a minority myself who also has a “month” and consider myself a progressive But I think it’s a bit strange for Dr Duran to honor “Latino Student Leaders.” Something about honoring students on the basis of their race and ethnicity doesn’t sit well with me.
Okay so?
They're Latino STUDENT LEADERS being honored during Hispanic/Latino heritage month. They're not just being honored for being Latino. I'm sure if they have Irish student leaders, they'd also get a shout out during their month.
Find something legitimate to worry about. This is a bad faith argument at its core. This is like if during Black History Month, Duran was honoring Black Civil Rights Activists and all you heard was the black part. It's a descriptor, not a noun.
I guarantee that APS will not be honoring any "Irish Student Leaders" during Irish heritage month, which is a real thing and is in March.
Probably because Irish Americans don't claim minority status or advocate under the auspices of being an under-represented community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m part of a minority myself who also has a “month” and consider myself a progressive But I think it’s a bit strange for Dr Duran to honor “Latino Student Leaders.” Something about honoring students on the basis of their race and ethnicity doesn’t sit well with me.
Okay so?
They're Latino STUDENT LEADERS being honored during Hispanic/Latino heritage month. They're not just being honored for being Latino. I'm sure if they have Irish student leaders, they'd also get a shout out during their month.
Find something legitimate to worry about. This is a bad faith argument at its core. This is like if during Black History Month, Duran was honoring Black Civil Rights Activists and all you heard was the black part. It's a descriptor, not a noun.
I guarantee that APS will not be honoring any "Irish Student Leaders" during Irish heritage month, which is a real thing and is in March.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m part of a minority myself who also has a “month” and consider myself a progressive But I think it’s a bit strange for Dr Duran to honor “Latino Student Leaders.” Something about honoring students on the basis of their race and ethnicity doesn’t sit well with me.
Okay so?
They're Latino STUDENT LEADERS being honored during Hispanic/Latino heritage month. They're not just being honored for being Latino. I'm sure if they have Irish student leaders, they'd also get a shout out during their month.
Find something legitimate to worry about. This is a bad faith argument at its core. This is like if during Black History Month, Duran was honoring Black Civil Rights Activists and all you heard was the black part. It's a descriptor, not a noun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s my question: where does it end? I mean, for those who support this kind of race based decision making.
What groups are deserving of recognition beyond Hispanic? Are we doing this for every group? Which ones specifically?
Also, my dear friend growing up had a Hispanic last name, whose father came to the US as a lawyer, and who was a National Merit Scholar. S/he was racially white and only had white friends. Is s/he the Hispanic “community” you are seeking to recognize?
I wonder if people like you ever get tired of the lame slippery slope "where does it end" argument.?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s my question: where does it end? I mean, for those who support this kind of race based decision making.
What groups are deserving of recognition beyond Hispanic? Are we doing this for every group? Which ones specifically?
Also, my dear friend growing up had a Hispanic last name, whose father came to the US as a lawyer, and who was a National Merit Scholar. S/he was racially white and only had white friends. Is s/he the Hispanic “community” you are seeking to recognize?
Finally - the troll at long last plays their card.