Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obvious boy names for girls is a low class southern thing
That, and a signal that the parent is sexist but too dumb to realize it.
Tell me OP, would you name your boy Emma, Rose, or Charlotte?
To be fair, none of those names are considered gender neutral at all. Hunter is becoming more common for girls, :
https://www.thebump.com/b/hunter-baby-name#chart
Think throwing sexism around is a bit much here. Overall I don't disagree with your implicit statement that more "boy" names have become gender neutral than girl names. And, I'm sure you're right there is a lot to unpack as to why that is the case...but it's a leap to call OP an ignorant sexist.
Anonymous wrote:I would do Jumper. The jumpers are more fun and you don’t want to limit her.
Anonymous wrote:Makes me think of Hunter Tylo.
I will be the lone dissenter who think it's not that bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obvious boy names for girls is a low class southern thing
That, and a signal that the parent is sexist but too dumb to realize it.
Tell me OP, would you name your boy Emma, Rose, or Charlotte?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just name her Artemis. Hunter for a girl is dumb.
I'd go with Diana, if the meaning is what matters.
I prefer Hunter to Artemis, which will get butchered and is the sort of name a child comes to loathe.