Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if criminals get arrested, they know they’ll skate right back onto the streets as long as DC is controlled by Democrats. Nothing is changing any time soon.
Why should cops even bother risking their lives to make an arrest?
Risking their lives? It’s not even that stark. What about risking their pensions and even their career employability just because they might make a justifiable use of force and the protester-class decides to target them?
Not worth it. Let the crimes happen, show up when the perps are gone, take a report, tell the victim to file an insurance claim and go home safe at the end of the day. See a crime in progress? Look the other way, pretend you didn’t see it.
This x 100. You make a human being feel like they’re a monster and project that you’re going to prosecute them if an interaction with a hardened criminal doesn’t go look good on someone’s cell phone camera and they’re going to have a natural human response and start acting exactly as PP describes. Why go the extra mile and be proactive about stopping crimes before they happen when it’s putting your career and your family’s reputation and financial security in jeopardy? There are absolutely no incentives for cops to not just dial it in and do the bare minimum.
If you're violently slamming unarmed, non-violent, non-threatening people onto the ground, face down, putting your knee on their back, just because they asked you what's going on or why you stopped them, you might in fact be a monster.
Links to that happening recently in DC.
It happens every week, all over the country. People are fatigued by the constant stream of incidents of excessive use of force. Police departments owe it to communities to do better and rebuild trust.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC Council Member Charles Allen declares “This violence is unacceptable.” DC Democrats including the police force and union supported him. But now, they say “Charles Allen has turned a blind eye to concerned residents. Rather Charles Allen chooses to cater to an activist crowd whose agenda is anti-police whatever the cost.”
“Allen’s reform measures have resulted in a tragic loss of life and an increase in violent crime.”
So sad how DC keeps voting for more destruction of its own.
Hi. Defunding the police isn't about being anti-police. It's about being anti-militarization of the police. It's about putting budget pressure on the police departments to reduce spending on high tech guns, armored vehicles, etc. It's about repurposing those funds to social net programs to build positive changes in communities. Its about police departments reprioritizing community policing rather than military tactical ops.
Just because when MPD faced budget pressure they decided to downsize the force doesn't mean the decision to shrink/hold their budget was wrong. It means their mgmt didn't make the right choices to retain force size while shrinking these expensive and largely unnecessary purchases of high tech people killing gear.
Can you show me in the police budget the expenditure for armored vehicles or high tech guns?
Your screed, which you continue to keep posting, has been soundly debunked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if criminals get arrested, they know they’ll skate right back onto the streets as long as DC is controlled by Democrats. Nothing is changing any time soon.
Why should cops even bother risking their lives to make an arrest?
Risking their lives? It’s not even that stark. What about risking their pensions and even their career employability just because they might make a justifiable use of force and the protester-class decides to target them?
Not worth it. Let the crimes happen, show up when the perps are gone, take a report, tell the victim to file an insurance claim and go home safe at the end of the day. See a crime in progress? Look the other way, pretend you didn’t see it.
This x 100. You make a human being feel like they’re a monster and project that you’re going to prosecute them if an interaction with a hardened criminal doesn’t go look good on someone’s cell phone camera and they’re going to have a natural human response and start acting exactly as PP describes. Why go the extra mile and be proactive about stopping crimes before they happen when it’s putting your career and your family’s reputation and financial security in jeopardy? There are absolutely no incentives for cops to not just dial it in and do the bare minimum.
If you're violently slamming unarmed, non-violent, non-threatening people onto the ground, face down, putting your knee on their back, just because they asked you what's going on or why you stopped them, you might in fact be a monster.
Yes, you are in that situation. And no one is excusing that type of behavior.
But you have cops that have had their lives ruined for shooting a girl who was about to stab someone to death, like the officer who shot Ma’Khia Bryant.
If you can’t not have your name dragged through the mud and fight for your life and career in court for shooting someone who was a millisecond away from stabbing a girl with a knife, why would you even bother trying to prevent crimes before they happen by doing proactive policing?
So you admit they are not doing their jobs?
Lay them off and hire private security. Why are we approving budget-busting police budgets? If they ain’t gonna do sh#t because they are pissy about some event that happened across the country, then send them home for good.
Yes because private security guards will do a better job![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if criminals get arrested, they know they’ll skate right back onto the streets as long as DC is controlled by Democrats. Nothing is changing any time soon.
Why should cops even bother risking their lives to make an arrest?
Risking their lives? It’s not even that stark. What about risking their pensions and even their career employability just because they might make a justifiable use of force and the protester-class decides to target them?
Not worth it. Let the crimes happen, show up when the perps are gone, take a report, tell the victim to file an insurance claim and go home safe at the end of the day. See a crime in progress? Look the other way, pretend you didn’t see it.
This x 100. You make a human being feel like they’re a monster and project that you’re going to prosecute them if an interaction with a hardened criminal doesn’t go look good on someone’s cell phone camera and they’re going to have a natural human response and start acting exactly as PP describes. Why go the extra mile and be proactive about stopping crimes before they happen when it’s putting your career and your family’s reputation and financial security in jeopardy? There are absolutely no incentives for cops to not just dial it in and do the bare minimum.
If you're violently slamming unarmed, non-violent, non-threatening people onto the ground, face down, putting your knee on their back, just because they asked you what's going on or why you stopped them, you might in fact be a monster.
Links to that happening recently in DC.
It happens every week, all over the country. People are fatigued by the constant stream of incidents of excessive use of force. Police departments owe it to communities to do better and rebuild trust.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when you flood the country with cheap guns.
You can’t police or prosecute your way out of dumb young men getting free access to firearms.
“Cheap guns.” What are those. Guns don’t cost what an automobile does, but they’re hardly “cheap.”
“Dumb young men.” Over 21? Not prohibited by criminal history or something else? Because if not they can’t legally buy a gun.
“Free access.” Hardly. Especially in DC there are multiple hurdles to get over for a lawful purchase, and unlawful purchases already are, well, unlawful.
Do you have any grounds beyond your own politically-driven assumption to assert that whatever guns were used here were (1) cheap; (2) legally purchased; (3) used by a person of subnormal intelligence; or (4) obtained “freely,” whatever that means?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if criminals get arrested, they know they’ll skate right back onto the streets as long as DC is controlled by Democrats. Nothing is changing any time soon.
Why should cops even bother risking their lives to make an arrest?
Risking their lives? It’s not even that stark. What about risking their pensions and even their career employability just because they might make a justifiable use of force and the protester-class decides to target them?
Not worth it. Let the crimes happen, show up when the perps are gone, take a report, tell the victim to file an insurance claim and go home safe at the end of the day. See a crime in progress? Look the other way, pretend you didn’t see it.
This x 100. You make a human being feel like they’re a monster and project that you’re going to prosecute them if an interaction with a hardened criminal doesn’t go look good on someone’s cell phone camera and they’re going to have a natural human response and start acting exactly as PP describes. Why go the extra mile and be proactive about stopping crimes before they happen when it’s putting your career and your family’s reputation and financial security in jeopardy? There are absolutely no incentives for cops to not just dial it in and do the bare minimum.
If you're violently slamming unarmed, non-violent, non-threatening people onto the ground, face down, putting your knee on their back, just because they asked you what's going on or why you stopped them, you might in fact be a monster.
Links to that happening recently in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Many people are scared to go out in DC in the evenings just for a simple dinner/date night. The mayor is screaming about the end of telework but doesn’t have a single plan for shootings , murder and other crime.
Anonymous wrote:
The Point is not at Navy Yard or the Wharf; it's on Buzzard's point. And as horrible as this is, it's not going to make me wary of going to any of those places.
Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when you flood the country with cheap guns.
You can’t police or prosecute your way out of dumb young men getting free access to firearms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if criminals get arrested, they know they’ll skate right back onto the streets as long as DC is controlled by Democrats. Nothing is changing any time soon.
Why should cops even bother risking their lives to make an arrest?
Risking their lives? It’s not even that stark. What about risking their pensions and even their career employability just because they might make a justifiable use of force and the protester-class decides to target them?
Not worth it. Let the crimes happen, show up when the perps are gone, take a report, tell the victim to file an insurance claim and go home safe at the end of the day. See a crime in progress? Look the other way, pretend you didn’t see it.
This x 100. You make a human being feel like they’re a monster and project that you’re going to prosecute them if an interaction with a hardened criminal doesn’t go look good on someone’s cell phone camera and they’re going to have a natural human response and start acting exactly as PP describes. Why go the extra mile and be proactive about stopping crimes before they happen when it’s putting your career and your family’s reputation and financial security in jeopardy? There are absolutely no incentives for cops to not just dial it in and do the bare minimum.
If you're violently slamming unarmed, non-violent, non-threatening people onto the ground, face down, putting your knee on their back, just because they asked you what's going on or why you stopped them, you might in fact be a monster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if criminals get arrested, they know they’ll skate right back onto the streets as long as DC is controlled by Democrats. Nothing is changing any time soon.
Why should cops even bother risking their lives to make an arrest?
Risking their lives? It’s not even that stark. What about risking their pensions and even their career employability just because they might make a justifiable use of force and the protester-class decides to target them?
Not worth it. Let the crimes happen, show up when the perps are gone, take a report, tell the victim to file an insurance claim and go home safe at the end of the day. See a crime in progress? Look the other way, pretend you didn’t see it.
This x 100. You make a human being feel like they’re a monster and project that you’re going to prosecute them if an interaction with a hardened criminal doesn’t go look good on someone’s cell phone camera and they’re going to have a natural human response and start acting exactly as PP describes. Why go the extra mile and be proactive about stopping crimes before they happen when it’s putting your career and your family’s reputation and financial security in jeopardy? There are absolutely no incentives for cops to not just dial it in and do the bare minimum.
If you're violently slamming unarmed, non-violent, non-threatening people onto the ground, face down, putting your knee on their back, just because they asked you what's going on or why you stopped them, you might in fact be a monster.
Yes, you are in that situation. And no one is excusing that type of behavior.
But you have cops that have had their lives ruined for shooting a girl who was about to stab someone to death, like the officer who shot Ma’Khia Bryant.
If you can’t not have your name dragged through the mud and fight for your life and career in court for shooting someone who was a millisecond away from stabbing a girl with a knife, why would you even bother trying to prevent crimes before they happen by doing proactive policing?
So you admit they are not doing their jobs?
Lay them off and hire private security. Why are we approving budget-busting police budgets? If they ain’t gonna do sh#t because they are pissy about some event that happened across the country, then send them home for good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if criminals get arrested, they know they’ll skate right back onto the streets as long as DC is controlled by Democrats. Nothing is changing any time soon.
Why should cops even bother risking their lives to make an arrest?
Risking their lives? It’s not even that stark. What about risking their pensions and even their career employability just because they might make a justifiable use of force and the protester-class decides to target them?
Not worth it. Let the crimes happen, show up when the perps are gone, take a report, tell the victim to file an insurance claim and go home safe at the end of the day. See a crime in progress? Look the other way, pretend you didn’t see it.
This x 100. You make a human being feel like they’re a monster and project that you’re going to prosecute them if an interaction with a hardened criminal doesn’t go look good on someone’s cell phone camera and they’re going to have a natural human response and start acting exactly as PP describes. Why go the extra mile and be proactive about stopping crimes before they happen when it’s putting your career and your family’s reputation and financial security in jeopardy? There are absolutely no incentives for cops to not just dial it in and do the bare minimum.
If you're violently slamming unarmed, non-violent, non-threatening people onto the ground, face down, putting your knee on their back, just because they asked you what's going on or why you stopped them, you might in fact be a monster.
Yes, you are in that situation. And no one is excusing that type of behavior.
But you have cops that have had their lives ruined for shooting a girl who was about to stab someone to death, like the officer who shot Ma’Khia Bryant.
If you can’t not have your name dragged through the mud and fight for your life and career in court for shooting someone who was a millisecond away from stabbing a girl with a knife, why would you even bother trying to prevent crimes before they happen by doing proactive policing?