Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Related question - how much are you "pressuring" your own kids to end up in the types of high paying professions you pursued - tech, dr, lawyer from a top law school?
Do you think it matters because life is expensive and you still want them to be on top financially - to have the best mansions and Teslas that you have [or whatever the equivalent fancy goods will be when they're 30]? Or do you feel like - you've sacrificed to build family wealth so now they can do what they want even if that's urban planning or non profits or being a teacher?
This is a myth. DC was born with a medical condition and I truly hoped that she would grow up to be a doctor to help kids. DC has no interest in biology and I am encouraging her to follow what she likes
I'm glad this is a myth nowadays. When I was growing up in the 90s in NJ - born and raised in the US to immigrant parents - it def was not a myth. For myself and all of my friends, our parents made clear that the career option they wanted was DOCTOR, if you truly could not do that [like you didn't have the aptitude in bio/chem to get in], then you could consider engineering or investment banking (only if you went to a school like Wharton and only bc we were close to NYC) or law (again ivy league law schools only). I mean my parents were "reasonable" in that they didn't pressure us to be doctors but let us pick between medicine, law, and finance but that was it. I had other friends in high school who absolutely forced them into medicine when they did not want to go. These people are now age 40+ slogging away in medicine and they hate it and yes it has strained parental relationships, while the parents sit there and say - so what if you aren't "happy" look how rich you are. Meanwhile these 40+ year olds hate their day to day lives. I'm not suggesting I know TONS of people in this boat, but I do know multiple people in this boat.
So I'm glad the parents of today are encouraging their kids to explore and decide on professions that won't make them miserable for 40 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Related question - how much are you "pressuring" your own kids to end up in the types of high paying professions you pursued - tech, dr, lawyer from a top law school?
Do you think it matters because life is expensive and you still want them to be on top financially - to have the best mansions and Teslas that you have [or whatever the equivalent fancy goods will be when they're 30]? Or do you feel like - you've sacrificed to build family wealth so now they can do what they want even if that's urban planning or non profits or being a teacher?
This is a myth. DC was born with a medical condition and I truly hoped that she would grow up to be a doctor to help kids. DC has no interest in biology and I am encouraging her to follow what she likes
Anonymous wrote:Related question - how much are you "pressuring" your own kids to end up in the types of high paying professions you pursued - tech, dr, lawyer from a top law school?
Do you think it matters because life is expensive and you still want them to be on top financially - to have the best mansions and Teslas that you have [or whatever the equivalent fancy goods will be when they're 30]? Or do you feel like - you've sacrificed to build family wealth so now they can do what they want even if that's urban planning or non profits or being a teacher?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Underachiever here - age 43 - 225k as a lawyer at a financial regulator. Did the biglaw thing for 8 years so I guess I made money there, but not the type of money that associates make now and I had no prayer of making partner. Yes I'm plenty Americanized with ivy degrees and all but coming up for partner in 2008 in NYC didn't help - no one was going to stick their neck out for me and my career never recovered. So here I am stuck in government.
you are not an underachiever....
Objectively I get that but it doesn't feel that way when every uncle in town - and to an extent my own parents - are constantly like partner partner partner, you didn't make partner, after all that money your parents spent sending you to the ivys blah blah. They act like the 2008 recession was a personal failing. Sure I guess it was a personal failing to not want to jump to another firm and slog it out for another 5 years to try to make it, but I just didn't have it in me to work the 80-90 hr NYC weeks for that much longer with no guarantees; another thing these uncles - most of whom never worked more than 40.0 hours a day in their lives in engineering do not understand. (I do understand that many many Indian immigrants slogged out much much longer hours, but the ones judging me were all in engineering and all had the 40 hours and I'm checked out by 5 pm lives.)
You need to live your life per what pleases you. Tell your uncles, parents they are no longer in the “old country” where you’re never good enough as a person if you don’t excel professionally. Life really is very temporary, a game of sorts and sadly the legacy Indian culture is blind to this fact. Refreshingly with newer generations, I’m seeing Indian kids become teachers, journalists, firemen, cops, chefs, etc. The fear factor decreases with each generation.
Anonymous wrote:48. 850k lawyer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Underachiever here - age 43 - 225k as a lawyer at a financial regulator. Did the biglaw thing for 8 years so I guess I made money there, but not the type of money that associates make now and I had no prayer of making partner. Yes I'm plenty Americanized with ivy degrees and all but coming up for partner in 2008 in NYC didn't help - no one was going to stick their neck out for me and my career never recovered. So here I am stuck in government.
you are not an underachiever....
Objectively I get that but it doesn't feel that way when every uncle in town - and to an extent my own parents - are constantly like partner partner partner, you didn't make partner, after all that money your parents spent sending you to the ivys blah blah. They act like the 2008 recession was a personal failing. Sure I guess it was a personal failing to not want to jump to another firm and slog it out for another 5 years to try to make it, but I just didn't have it in me to work the 80-90 hr NYC weeks for that much longer with no guarantees; another thing these uncles - most of whom never worked more than 40.0 hours a day in their lives in engineering do not understand. (I do understand that many many Indian immigrants slogged out much much longer hours, but the ones judging me were all in engineering and all had the 40 hours and I'm checked out by 5 pm lives.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Underachiever here - age 43 - 225k as a lawyer at a financial regulator. Did the biglaw thing for 8 years so I guess I made money there, but not the type of money that associates make now and I had no prayer of making partner. Yes I'm plenty Americanized with ivy degrees and all but coming up for partner in 2008 in NYC didn't help - no one was going to stick their neck out for me and my career never recovered. So here I am stuck in government.
you are not an underachiever....
Objectively I get that but it doesn't feel that way when every uncle in town - and to an extent my own parents - are constantly like partner partner partner, you didn't make partner, after all that money your parents spent sending you to the ivys blah blah. They act like the 2008 recession was a personal failing. Sure I guess it was a personal failing to not want to jump to another firm and slog it out for another 5 years to try to make it, but I just didn't have it in me to work the 80-90 hr NYC weeks for that much longer with no guarantees; another thing these uncles - most of whom never worked more than 40.0 hours a day in their lives in engineering do not understand. (I do understand that many many Indian immigrants slogged out much much longer hours, but the ones judging me were all in engineering and all had the 40 hours and I'm checked out by 5 pm lives.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Underachiever here - age 43 - 225k as a lawyer at a financial regulator. Did the biglaw thing for 8 years so I guess I made money there, but not the type of money that associates make now and I had no prayer of making partner. Yes I'm plenty Americanized with ivy degrees and all but coming up for partner in 2008 in NYC didn't help - no one was going to stick their neck out for me and my career never recovered. So here I am stuck in government.
you are not an underachiever....
Anonymous wrote:Underachiever here - age 43 - 225k as a lawyer at a financial regulator. Did the biglaw thing for 8 years so I guess I made money there, but not the type of money that associates make now and I had no prayer of making partner. Yes I'm plenty Americanized with ivy degrees and all but coming up for partner in 2008 in NYC didn't help - no one was going to stick their neck out for me and my career never recovered. So here I am stuck in government.