Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I earn a hell of a lot more than the nanny we hire. I have formal education that makes me qualified to do my job and the nanny has no formal education beyond HS. The nanny loves spending all day every day with children and I do not.
Are you providing her the same opportunity?
I am talking a macro basis? Let’s say 1 million women have a job in an office and one million women had a nanny. Why not educate Nanny’s to do rewarding high paid work?
Let moms be with own kids at least till eligible for childcare and back up office
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BTW vast majority of people say Nanny in DC but they don’t pay Nanny wages.
$100,000 a year with full benefits is bare minimum.
Gloria Richards is a famous Nanny and she charges $167 an hour. But $100k is going rate.
Sound right as back in 1996 my cousin married a nanny who worked for hedge fund guy and she was making $40k a year, free room and board, full benefits. They gave her a $10,000 wedding gift check when she got married. Even used their Hampton house for free if she took vacation.
In NYC and San Fran in 2023 going rate is $150,000 to $220,000 for a nanny.
Real Nannies pass the Nanny Association Exam, speak multiple languages. In case of my cousins wife she had a Nursing Degree. And was a certified newborn care specialist.
And in Manhattan even with 200k a year the nanny gets free room and board and food stipend.
Vast majority DC parents have an illegal or a women they are taking advantage of.
If a real Nanny a person would need to earn 500k or more to make it worth while.
Really? And what do these super nannies do? Our last nanny couldn't make a grilled cheese sandwich without burning it, and sent the kids out in 40 degree weather with no coat. I've yet to hire a nanny that didn't require a serious amount of micromanaging to get tasks done like kids' laundry and homework supervision.
Sounds like you either can’t afford a great nanny or you can’t hire effectively.
If every nanny must be micromanaged, then it’s you. You. You’re the problem, it’s you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BTW vast majority of people say Nanny in DC but they don’t pay Nanny wages.
$100,000 a year with full benefits is bare minimum.
Gloria Richards is a famous Nanny and she charges $167 an hour. But $100k is going rate.
Sound right as back in 1996 my cousin married a nanny who worked for hedge fund guy and she was making $40k a year, free room and board, full benefits. They gave her a $10,000 wedding gift check when she got married. Even used their Hampton house for free if she took vacation.
In NYC and San Fran in 2023 going rate is $150,000 to $220,000 for a nanny.
Real Nannies pass the Nanny Association Exam, speak multiple languages. In case of my cousins wife she had a Nursing Degree. And was a certified newborn care specialist.
And in Manhattan even with 200k a year the nanny gets free room and board and food stipend.
Vast majority DC parents have an illegal or a women they are taking advantage of.
If a real Nanny a person would need to earn 500k or more to make it worth while.
Really? And what do these super nannies do? Our last nanny couldn't make a grilled cheese sandwich without burning it, and sent the kids out in 40 degree weather with no coat. I've yet to hire a nanny that didn't require a serious amount of micromanaging to get tasks done like kids' laundry and homework supervision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BTW vast majority of people say Nanny in DC but they don’t pay Nanny wages.
$100,000 a year with full benefits is bare minimum.
Gloria Richards is a famous Nanny and she charges $167 an hour. But $100k is going rate.
Sound right as back in 1996 my cousin married a nanny who worked for hedge fund guy and she was making $40k a year, free room and board, full benefits. They gave her a $10,000 wedding gift check when she got married. Even used their Hampton house for free if she took vacation.
In NYC and San Fran in 2023 going rate is $150,000 to $220,000 for a nanny.
Real Nannies pass the Nanny Association Exam, speak multiple languages. In case of my cousins wife she had a Nursing Degree. And was a certified newborn care specialist.
And in Manhattan even with 200k a year the nanny gets free room and board and food stipend.
Vast majority DC parents have an illegal or a women they are taking advantage of.
If a real Nanny a person would need to earn 500k or more to make it worth while.
Really? And what do these super nannies do? Our last nanny couldn't make a grilled cheese sandwich without burning it, and sent the kids out in 40 degree weather with no coat. I've yet to hire a nanny that didn't require a serious amount of micromanaging to get tasks done like kids' laundry and homework supervision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BTW vast majority of people say Nanny in DC but they don’t pay Nanny wages.
$100,000 a year with full benefits is bare minimum.
Gloria Richards is a famous Nanny and she charges $167 an hour. But $100k is going rate.
Sound right as back in 1996 my cousin married a nanny who worked for hedge fund guy and she was making $40k a year, free room and board, full benefits. They gave her a $10,000 wedding gift check when she got married. Even used their Hampton house for free if she took vacation.
In NYC and San Fran in 2023 going rate is $150,000 to $220,000 for a nanny.
Real Nannies pass the Nanny Association Exam, speak multiple languages. In case of my cousins wife she had a Nursing Degree. And was a certified newborn care specialist.
And in Manhattan even with 200k a year the nanny gets free room and board and food stipend.
Vast majority DC parents have an illegal or a women they are taking advantage of.
If a real Nanny a person would need to earn 500k or more to make it worth while.
Really? And what do these super nannies do? Our last nanny couldn't make a grilled cheese sandwich without burning it, and sent the kids out in 40 degree weather with no coat. I've yet to hire a nanny that didn't require a serious amount of micromanaging to get tasks done like kids' laundry and homework supervision.
Anonymous wrote:On a macro level if a women or man hires a nanny so she or he can go to an office job what is point?
Why not just let Nanny do the office job and you watch your own kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everyone wants to be around young children every day.
It doesn’t mean you’re not a good parent. If you don’t enjoy parks, playing with blocks, playing with dolls etc, why not hire someone who does.
Also, if you’re making good money that’s a lot to give up lifestyle, extras etc.
Of course you're a bad parent if you don't want to spend time with your children!
Stop kidding yourself that "quality time" of an hour a day is all the time your children need from you.
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone wants to be around young children every day.
It doesn’t mean you’re not a good parent. If you don’t enjoy parks, playing with blocks, playing with dolls etc, why not hire someone who does.
Also, if you’re making good money that’s a lot to give up lifestyle, extras etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I earn a hell of a lot more than the nanny we hire. I have formal education that makes me qualified to do my job and the nanny has no formal education beyond HS. The nanny loves spending all day every day with children and I do not.
Are you providing her the same opportunity?
I am talking a macro basis? Let’s say 1 million women have a job in an office and one million women had a nanny. Why not educate Nanny’s to do rewarding high paid work?
Let moms be with own kids at least till eligible for childcare and back up office
Anonymous wrote:On a macro level if a women or man hires a nanny so she or he can go to an office job what is point?
Why not just let Nanny do the office job and you watch your own kids?
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone wants to be around young children every day.
It doesn’t mean you’re not a good parent. If you don’t enjoy parks, playing with blocks, playing with dolls etc, why not hire someone who does.
Also, if you’re making good money that’s a lot to give up lifestyle, extras etc.