Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overall yield increased at UVA after ED was initiated. Of course it’s yield protection!
You always post that. Yield protection is the practice of rejecting top applicants because there's an assumption they aren't going to enroll.
ED has 100% yield and it's a totally different thing.
So why did UVA’s yield rate rise remarkably after it initiated ED? Are you actually believing that UVA started to offer ED for anything other but to increase its yield? Technically it might not fit the exact definition of yield protection, but the end result is that it definitely increases yield. That’s the point.
One more time. The practice of rejecting top applicants is called yield protection.
ED affects overall yield rate, but it is not the practice of rejecting top applicants.
People explain this time and again to you, so now I think you're either obtuse or think you're funny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1,040 accepted ED in 2022 (4,243 applied)
1,109 accepted ED in 2021 (3,466 applied)
965 accepted ED in 2020 (2,937 applied)
748 accepted ED in 2019 (2,159 applied)
If the trend continues, applications will go up.
Can most likely lock in 2/3 or 3/4 of the out of state quota in ED. Then cherry pick the rest of out of state from RD.
Accept that isn’t what UVA does because they don’t favor ED
Anonymous wrote:All the athletes are ED so not sure if ED is easier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overall yield increased at UVA after ED was initiated. Of course it’s yield protection!
You always post that. Yield protection is the practice of rejecting top applicants because there's an assumption they aren't going to enroll.
ED has 100% yield and it's a totally different thing.
So why did UVA’s yield rate rise remarkably after it initiated ED? Are you actually believing that UVA started to offer ED for anything other but to increase its yield? Technically it might not fit the exact definition of yield protection, but the end result is that it definitely increases yield. That’s the point.
One more time. The practice of rejecting top applicants is called yield protection.
ED affects overall yield rate, but it is not the practice of rejecting top applicants.
People explain this time and again to you, so now I think you're either obtuse or think you're funny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overall yield increased at UVA after ED was initiated. Of course it’s yield protection!
You always post that. Yield protection is the practice of rejecting top applicants because there's an assumption they aren't going to enroll.
ED has 100% yield and it's a totally different thing.
So why did UVA’s yield rate rise remarkably after it initiated ED? Are you actually believing that UVA started to offer ED for anything other but to increase its yield? Technically it might not fit the exact definition of yield protection, but the end result is that it definitely increases yield. That’s the point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overall yield increased at UVA after ED was initiated. Of course it’s yield protection!
You always post that. Yield protection is the practice of rejecting top applicants because there's an assumption they aren't going to enroll.
ED has 100% yield and it's a totally different thing.
Anonymous wrote:Overall yield increased at UVA after ED was initiated. Of course it’s yield protection!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1,040 accepted ED in 2022 (4,243 applied)
1,109 accepted ED in 2021 (3,466 applied)
965 accepted ED in 2020 (2,937 applied)
748 accepted ED in 2019 (2,159 applied)
If the trend continues, applications will go up.
Can most likely lock in 2/3 or 3/4 of the out of state quota in ED. Then cherry pick the rest of out of state from RD.
Accept that isn’t what UVA does because they don’t favor ED
Check out “New Out-of-State Recruit” thread. UVA is competing with other state flagships for full pay students. They are going to lock in as many OOS applicants as they can to offset state budget losses.
Colleges are business as well as educational institutions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1,040 accepted ED in 2022 (4,243 applied)
1,109 accepted ED in 2021 (3,466 applied)
965 accepted ED in 2020 (2,937 applied)
748 accepted ED in 2019 (2,159 applied)
If the trend continues, applications will go up.
Can most likely lock in 2/3 or 3/4 of the out of state quota in ED. Then cherry pick the rest of out of state from RD.
Accept that isn’t what UVA does because they don’t favor ED
Anonymous wrote:Overall yield increased at UVA after ED was initiated. Of course it’s yield protection!
Anonymous wrote:OOS students waitlisted by UVA actually have a fairly large chance to be eventually admitted given the low OOS yield rate. But for in-state students, maybe 5% to get off the waitlist?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There never was a defer really it was just a nice way to say denied or waitlist.
I guess now you know if you are on the waitlist.
Last year, DC’s good friend (OOS) was deferred in ED and accepted in RD. It did happen for some kids.
Anonymous wrote:It is yield protection because UVA will now admit a greater percentage via ED which is the ultimate form of yield protection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1,040 accepted ED in 2022 (4,243 applied)
1,109 accepted ED in 2021 (3,466 applied)
965 accepted ED in 2020 (2,937 applied)
748 accepted ED in 2019 (2,159 applied)
If the trend continues, applications will go up.
Can most likely lock in 2/3 or 3/4 of the out of state quota in ED. Then cherry pick the rest of out of state from RD.