Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm struggling to figure out what this scenario has to do with sunk costs.
+1
In the future, OP, please stick to using terms whose meaning you actually know.
The stuff isn’t worth what he thinks it’s worth, so he won’t get rid of it. I thought that’s what it was? Am I wrong?
Like if I bought a dresser for $1000 and I no longer need it, but won’t part with it because the most I can get is $100 today, but I paid $1000 for it years ago, so it has to be worth more!
I apologize, I thought that was sunk cost! What’s the term I’m looking for?