Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So can everyone just say they're the family of a student athlete? My five-year-old son really wants to attend his first football game...
Yes you will be fine. They won't be letting in unaccompanied high school aged kids who can't show ID. That's all.
They should make parents come and supervise their kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So can everyone just say they're the family of a student athlete? My five-year-old son really wants to attend his first football game...
Yes you will be fine. They won't be letting in unaccompanied high school aged kids who can't show ID. That's all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BTW- upon review of videos, students involved and identified have been pulled and received notice: 10 days suspension with grounds for expulsion.
How do you know this?
This has not been released by the school. I highly doubt it’s true. Source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BTW- upon review of videos, students involved and identified have been pulled and received notice: 10 days suspension with grounds for expulsion.
What does “with grounds for expulsion mean?” Either they’re suspended or expelled, what is this an in-between status?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“It is unsafe to have a high school football game under normal conditions” is a terrible message to send about the county.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BTW- upon review of videos, students involved and identified have been pulled and received notice: 10 days suspension with grounds for expulsion.
What does “with grounds for expulsion mean?” Either they’re suspended or expelled, what is this an in-between status?
Anonymous wrote:BTW- upon review of videos, students involved and identified have been pulled and received notice: 10 days suspension with grounds for expulsion.
Anonymous wrote:BTW- upon review of videos, students involved and identified have been pulled and received notice: 10 days suspension with grounds for expulsion.
Anonymous wrote:What can be done to hold the parents/guardians accountable in this matter?
Anonymous wrote:Not only is MCPS mishandling this situation horribly wrong (again), but the messaging continues to be about "the physical altercation". In the video that went around alone, there were actually TWO different assaults occurring. However, there were multiple others that occurred...including at least one where the child had worse injuries than the one in the viral video.
Proves again that MCPS has a narrative that they are going to push. Sadly, I'm confident Monifa would not acknowledge anything had this video not gone public.
This school system needs new leadership quickly!
Anonymous wrote:The attacks happened off school property when kids were their parents responsibility. While MCPS has far more than their fair share of issues, a big part of the blame is on the parents.
Anonymous wrote:“It is unsafe to have a high school football game under normal conditions” is a terrible message to send about the county.