Anonymous wrote:I think the court needs to redirect who has custody of the children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are the arsehole.
I hope he finds out you have these means and challenges whatever child support you are getting.
This is beyond ridiculous. You shouldn’t make these kinds of decisions unilaterally. Especially the religious indoctrination—
Hopefully he goes back to court to challenge the custody arrangement. I would.
Not his money. None of his business. He still has to pay the court ordered support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have the right to make all education decisions, then it doesn’t matter if he objects. He still owes you child support. It DOES matter if you lie to him or have your children lie to him.
I haven't directly lied to him because he has never asked me what school they go to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"he has been withholding child support (he claims that the state has been holding the support, but I could get the money quicker if he gave one big payment a month and not divide it into 2-3 payments a month)."
What does this mean?
It means he’s having the support paid through the state child support office (probably a per paycheck amount). There is always a delay in payment from the withholding date. The ex is probably smart enough to know it’s better for the support to route through the state then paying her directly.
Why would that be better? Actual question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any other details you want to include, OP?
This. I called troll because no one could be dumb enough to put this much personal information on the Internet. Especially if it’s supposed to be a secret If I know you then I know it’s you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"he has been withholding child support (he claims that the state has been holding the support, but I could get the money quicker if he gave one big payment a month and not divide it into 2-3 payments a month)."
What does this mean?
It means he’s having the support paid through the state child support office (probably a per paycheck amount). There is always a delay in payment from the withholding date. The ex is probably smart enough to know it’s better for the support to route through the state then paying her directly.
Why would that be better? Actual question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"he has been withholding child support (he claims that the state has been holding the support, but I could get the money quicker if he gave one big payment a month and not divide it into 2-3 payments a month)."
What does this mean?
It means he’s having the support paid through the state child support office (probably a per paycheck amount). There is always a delay in payment from the withholding date. The ex is probably smart enough to know it’s better for the support to route through the state then paying her directly.
Anonymous wrote:Any other details you want to include, OP?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did you get sole custody and sole control of educational decisions? What was that based on?
Before we were divorced, I was already the primary parent. I volunteered at the schools and I enrolled the kids. It was his idea to give me sole control of educational decisions. I don't have sole custody; the kids see him every weekend when he does not have to work.
They see him regularly and you make them they lie about what school they go to? My, my, OP. What a tangled web.
He has only asked once.
Anonymous wrote:"he has been withholding child support (he claims that the state has been holding the support, but I could get the money quicker if he gave one big payment a month and not divide it into 2-3 payments a month)."
What does this mean?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did you get sole custody and sole control of educational decisions? What was that based on?
Before we were divorced, I was already the primary parent. I volunteered at the schools and I enrolled the kids. It was his idea to give me sole control of educational decisions. I don't have sole custody; the kids see him every weekend when he does not have to work.
They see him regularly and you make them they lie about what school they go to? My, my, OP. What a tangled web.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll be the voice of dissent. Sometimes, with shitty exes, you have to be practical. It’s not ideal but it’s the best situation. But can’t they garnish his wages or something? Or jail him even?
There is zero evidence he is a “shitty ex.”
Wherever did you get that?
He was deployed. Now he is not. He should take her to court for 50/50 now.
You don't know the details but if I add more then you accuse me of trolling. He has made incredibly poor decisions. Even when he wasn't deployed, he wouldn't do a thing at home. He wanted me to work but also didn't want to pay for day care. And he has no interest in 50/50 considering that he lives in a one-bedroom apartment and doesn't feed the kids unless they ask. I don't even want to give the reason we divorced because you will accuse me of trolling and report the thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did you get sole custody and sole control of educational decisions? What was that based on?
Before we were divorced, I was already the primary parent. I volunteered at the schools and I enrolled the kids. It was his idea to give me sole control of educational decisions. I don't have sole custody; the kids see him every weekend when he does not have to work.