Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:50% is an F. An F is an F. Is an F.
you want to demand some kind of Super F?
No it isn’t. A 50% inflates the students GPA. If a student doesn’t show up to class and does absolutely nothing the entire year that student deserves a zero.
Agreed. As it is, the student could rip the test in half in front of the teacher and throw it in the trash and would still get a 50.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:50% is an F. An F is an F. Is an F.
you want to demand some kind of Super F?
No it isn’t. A 50% inflates the students GPA. If a student doesn’t show up to class and does absolutely nothing the entire year that student deserves a zero.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/69e8a356-393a-11ee-be2e-0cc7309dc5b8?shareToken=3a5551270297afd4971127896429e48f
Colleges in the UK are experiencing record drop-out rates ending up in students saddled with debt and no degree due to lax grading policies.
We have the same thing here in districts that adhere to open enrollment policies and 50% minimum grades.
Open enrollment is purportedly designed to prevent teacher bias from shutting out students from courses, but in fact ensures that students who aren't ready for the course will sign up for it anyway, resulting in pressure on teachers to lower standards and/or inflate grades while the student learns little or nothing. If you're worried about teacher bias , give all students automatically graded competency exams that they have to score specific grades on to enroll in specific classes.
It doesn't help disadvantaged students in the long run to just give them a pass. Everyone has to show competency at some point down the line. It's also deeply prejudicial to cast a shadow on the achievement of bright, hardworking students from disadvantaged backgrounds who absolutely belong in those courses and legitimately earned their grade to lump them in with privileged but not too bright nor studious kids who also milk these policies.
50% minima also outrageously inflate averages and mask lack of mastery.
These policies are bad for the country on so many levels.
Not to bring people off their talking points, but what exactly is "open enrollment?" I'm assuming it refers to practices that allows students to enroll in advanced courses in MS/HS without meeting the prerequisites for them, or perhaps by not even having formal prerequisites?
To what degree is this being practiced? (From personal experience up to MS in VA I have to say I haven't seen it: access to advanced Math and English, for instance, is strictly gatekept, much to the detriment of many DCUM posters who believe their child was misplaced. Is this something that starts in HS? Which courses are open enrollment in that they don't require prerequisites? Do they allows kid who haven't taken Algebra I to take Calculus? Or can someone take French AP without having taken French I through IV?)
Please explain what the actual problem is for those not familiar with it.
Anonymous wrote:This isn't just about kids getting 0% or 50%.
It's also kids on the high end cramming for a unit test and getting 90% and then forgetting the next day, not learning. Disappearing final exams.
It's colleges who don't care about educating, and just want tuition/grant funding to pay administrators.
Anonymous wrote:50% is an F. An F is an F. Is an F.
you want to demand some kind of Super F?
Anonymous wrote:OP may not have been clear but they have a valid point. Minimum grade of 50% along with the push for equitable grading has resulted in grade inflation in almost all public schools. That combined with open enrollment in AP classes tends to have those classes move slower, hence the constant nagging from parents to start school in mid-August or earlier so their little darling can do well on the AP exam.
Education needs to be returned to a meritocracy in the US, as it is in the UK. Have you kid take a semester or year abroad at a quality UK university and they will see how easy they have it in the US.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Open enrollment means that to the extent there is a course sequence, barefly passing the previous course entitles you to enroll in any level of the next course that is available even though you have functionally zero chance of succeeding in it. For instance, you passed English 10 with a D and you are therefore entitled to enroll in AP Lang in 11th. Or you passed Algebra 2 with a D and enroll in Precalc Honors.
In practice, though, not many kids who got Ds in Algebra 2 want to take Honors precalc. It’s much more common to see an ambitious kid with a 4.0 bristle at the idea that the school might intervene to prevent him from taking 8 APs simultaneously as a junior.
Yes, but that one kid and a couple of others will hog up 25% of your time and energy in extra help, parent contact, remediation, and retakes to no avail. And the ambitious kids' with the 8 APs are constantly whining about the workload, as are their parents who are shocked, shocked! that they have to stay up until 2 AM every night to get their work done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Open enrollment means that to the extent there is a course sequence, barefly passing the previous course entitles you to enroll in any level of the next course that is available even though you have functionally zero chance of succeeding in it. For instance, you passed English 10 with a D and you are therefore entitled to enroll in AP Lang in 11th. Or you passed Algebra 2 with a D and enroll in Precalc Honors.
In practice, though, not many kids who got Ds in Algebra 2 want to take Honors precalc. It’s much more common to see an ambitious kid with a 4.0 bristle at the idea that the school might intervene to prevent him from taking 8 APs simultaneously as a junior.
Anonymous wrote:Open enrollment means that to the extent there is a course sequence, barefly passing the previous course entitles you to enroll in any level of the next course that is available even though you have functionally zero chance of succeeding in it. For instance, you passed English 10 with a D and you are therefore entitled to enroll in AP Lang in 11th. Or you passed Algebra 2 with a D and enroll in Precalc Honors.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/69e8a356-393a-11ee-be2e-0cc7309dc5b8?shareToken=3a5551270297afd4971127896429e48f
Colleges in the UK are experiencing record drop-out rates ending up in students saddled with debt and no degree due to lax grading policies.
We have the same thing here in districts that adhere to open enrollment policies and 50% minimum grades.
Open enrollment is purportedly designed to prevent teacher bias from shutting out students from courses, but in fact ensures that students who aren't ready for the course will sign up for it anyway, resulting in pressure on teachers to lower standards and/or inflate grades while the student learns little or nothing. If you're worried about teacher bias , give all students automatically graded competency exams that they have to score specific grades on to enroll in specific classes.
It doesn't help disadvantaged students in the long run to just give them a pass. Everyone has to show competency at some point down the line. It's also deeply prejudicial to cast a shadow on the achievement of bright, hardworking students from disadvantaged backgrounds who absolutely belong in those courses and legitimately earned their grade to lump them in with privileged but not too bright nor studious kids who also milk these policies.
50% minima also outrageously inflate averages and mask lack of mastery.
These policies are bad for the country on so many levels.
Anonymous wrote:You idiots need to do the math. The reason for 50% is so -- maybe if they DO work really, really hard they have a (mathematical) prayer of bringing it up to a D
Anonymous wrote:You idiots need to do the math. The reason for 50% is so -- maybe if they DO work really, really hard they have a (mathematical) prayer of bringing it up to a D
Anonymous wrote:You idiots need to do the math. The reason for 50% is so -- maybe if they DO work really, really hard they have a (mathematical) prayer of bringing it up to a D