Anonymous wrote:^PS I would also suggest that it is important you are happy. My friend very much loves her community and she's very rooted in it. I think it prob impacted her kids and it's prob a great thing for them. The thing people don't realize about city is you have this exposure to a lot of experiences and people but as you grow up you can have that. When they are young, it's more important to have your kids know what stability and community look like. I am a firm believer that my kids don't have to be around diversity and those with less money to have empathy and appreciation of culture. If they don't have it, they won't get it simply by being around this. It's not external but internal and it comes from developing them as human beings not just ensuring they are around such.
I also think education comes in many forms and going to a good academic institution isn't all that if the kid is into something else besides being a professional. You need to grow up most importantly in an area you are comfortable in. Find your people and find your home. The rest comes with time.
That said, I am a city person through and through - hah!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes
Rural New England doesn’t have the same pathologies as rural areas of other regions
Uhhh yes it does.
Anonymous wrote:I have friends who did this. Dual doctors, moved to Alaska for $$$$ before having kids for 24 months. Came back to the lower 48 once they got pregnant. And they were in Anchorage, so it really wasn't that bad.
I would entertain it for New England or Pacific NW. No way would I do this in rural Midwest or the South.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there childcare? I’m actively trying to move possibly to rural New England and I have yet to find a daycare wait list under 2 years. If the job is offering on site childcare or enough to cover a nanny and there was at least a decent elementary school nearby, sign me up immediately!
I'm a bit surprised by this. You'd think there would be at least lots of church-based daycare, no?
Anonymous wrote:Yes
Rural New England doesn’t have the same pathologies as rural areas of other regions
Anonymous wrote:No.
1. DH grew up in a rural area until he was like 14. He said the best thing his parents did for him was to move out of the rural area. Nothing to do for teens = get into trouble.
He also said a lot of the teens didn't go to college. The peer group is just different.
2. We are a biracial family, and we want diversity.
3. Too far from a major airport. We have family on the opposite side of the coast, and also in another country, and we like to travel.
Plus all the other things people mentioned.
But, if you like the rural life, and you think your kids will, too, then sure. But, I know my kids would hate it.
Anonymous wrote:I have friends who did this. Dual doctors, moved to Alaska for $$$$ before having kids for 24 months. Came back to the lower 48 once they got pregnant. And they were in Anchorage, so it really wasn't that bad.
I would entertain it for New England or Pacific NW. No way would I do this in rural Midwest or the South.
I agree with the bolded. After having gone through caring for a family member with chronic illness, I want to be near a very good medical care/access. I cannot imagine schlepping over 50 miles for each medical treatment.Anonymous wrote:No. I have two early elementary kids and to be completely honest, I wouldn't want them to group up somewhere like that. We have family in some beautiful yet rural parts of the country but there are many limiting things about it -- not as great medical care/access to therapies (important with our SN DS); politically conservative; fewer opportunities for kids to get involved in sports, arts, etc; and it's not likely a place kids will want to or be able to stay or return to because there aren't really great options for jobs.
LCOL areas stay that way for a reason.