Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:the new head at gds has three children, two in the lower school. i think the lower school will be amazing next year. can't wait.
He can't make it amazing just with his presence. He will first need to replace some key staff and create an attitudinal shift.
I think that the lower school at GDS is already quite good and that faculty hires in recent years having generally been very strong. And I don't see an attitudnal problem among the teachers.
RE communication I'm not sure that the problem is bad communication as opposed to resistance to doing certain things some parents want done. When you aren't going to get what you want out of the lower school, rather than a clear statement to that effect (We hear you; we disagree; we won't be doing what you ask) what you tend to get is stonewalling. Which generally creates at least some period during which you wonder whether they're listening and/or what, if anything, they're doing.
Otherwise, in my experience, there's plenty of school-initiated communication generally (re what the kids are doing and why), as well as outreach when the school thinks that a kid has a problem. Of course, sometimes parents see problems (or have concerns) that the school doesn't see, in which case, the communication has to be parent-initiated. (And, of course, in that situation there's always the risk that the school doesn't agree with the parent's assessment, which lands us back in the scenario described above.)
I've generally gotten quick/responsive feedback when I've initiated, although I tend to back off when I see that I'm not going to get what I'm after from the school. In one case, there was no direct feedback, but subsequent events suggested that the teacher probably listened and ultimately ended up on the same page as I was, but wanted time to process independently rather than to discuss.