Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Each of these top programs like Fairfax Stars, Elevate, Durant, and Takeover are like independent franchises with each age group on the girls side. Different coaches, different players with different skill sets, and different W/L records. This is the same at all age groups. For example, like someone said ffx stars 2029 is very very good and ffx 2028 not so much. T Durant 2028 is very good, but T Durant 2029 isn't. So I would pick based on who the coach is for your team and how they fit in with the kids.

Very true. But overall the rankings in previous post is a good barometer. But just remember. The higher up the totem pole, the more ruthless it gets.

CTAB is ok. Put them in the bottom of the 5 pool.

Is put CTAB below stars, above GTS, GLP, PVS

CTAB below all of them.

lol, no

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Each of these top programs like Fairfax Stars, Elevate, Durant, and Takeover are like independent franchises with each age group on the girls side. Different coaches, different players with different skill sets, and different W/L records. This is the same at all age groups. For example, like someone said ffx stars 2029 is very very good and ffx 2028 not so much. T Durant 2028 is very good, but T Durant 2029 isn't. So I would pick based on who the coach is for your team and how they fit in with the kids.

Very true. But overall the rankings in previous post is a good barometer. But just remember. The higher up the totem pole, the more ruthless it gets.

CTAB is ok. Put them in the bottom of the 5 pool.

Is put CTAB below stars, above GTS, GLP, PVS

CTAB below all of them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Each of these top programs like Fairfax Stars, Elevate, Durant, and Takeover are like independent franchises with each age group on the girls side. Different coaches, different players with different skill sets, and different W/L records. This is the same at all age groups. For example, like someone said ffx stars 2029 is very very good and ffx 2028 not so much. T Durant 2028 is very good, but T Durant 2029 isn't. So I would pick based on who the coach is for your team and how they fit in with the kids.

Very true. But overall the rankings in previous post is a good barometer. But just remember. The higher up the totem pole, the more ruthless it gets.

CTAB is ok. Put them in the bottom of the 5 pool.

Is put CTAB below stars, above GTS, GLP, PVS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Each of these top programs like Fairfax Stars, Elevate, Durant, and Takeover are like independent franchises with each age group on the girls side. Different coaches, different players with different skill sets, and different W/L records. This is the same at all age groups. For example, like someone said ffx stars 2029 is very very good and ffx 2028 not so much. T Durant 2028 is very good, but T Durant 2029 isn't. So I would pick based on who the coach is for your team and how they fit in with the kids.

Very true. But overall the rankings in previous post is a good barometer. But just remember. The higher up the totem pole, the more ruthless it gets.

CTAB is ok. Put them in the bottom of the 5 pool.

Anonymous wrote:Each of these top programs like Fairfax Stars, Elevate, Durant, and Takeover are like independent franchises with each age group on the girls side. Different coaches, different players with different skill sets, and different W/L records. This is the same at all age groups. For example, like someone said ffx stars 2029 is very very good and ffx 2028 not so much. T Durant 2028 is very good, but T Durant 2029 isn't. So I would pick based on who the coach is for your team and how they fit in with the kids.

Anonymous wrote:Girls side I would say:

Takeover #1
Elevate Elite, Durant close 2nd
Fairfax Stars #3
PVT, GLP, GTS #4
All other local clubs 5

Anonymous wrote:How has the GTS / Loudoun Flight merger been going?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here again - the lacrosse world is quite small but yet it somehow has its own section! At any rate I am curious if like lacrosse....quality on clubs is very much grade based. Meaning 6th grade team is great but they will all be gone by high school etc. Does that make sense? ANy insight into that? Or is Takeover, Durant and Fairfax Stars legit regardless of age group. Also where does GLP and PVT stack compared to those?

Stars (girls side), takeover and Durant are all Nike sponsored so they get better as you get to high school. I can’t speak to boys, but on the girls side, pvt and glp are what I call the bottom of the decent clubs. I’d put hurricanes and elevate elite between the two tiers

How do you determine that ranking? DD plays for a different AAU team and all those teams above readily beat us. It was a couple of years ago. I felt the caliber of those clubs was impressive.

First hand experience with two daughters who went through it

To be clear... in your experience....

Fairfax Stars, Durant, Takeover are a step above even GLP?

Yes. Nike is the top circuit followed by Adidas and Under Armor is third.

This is good info thanks. I did not know that Elevate Elite was part of the Adidas circuit and became such a prominent program in high school.