Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do yourself a favor. Go to Elizabeth Tanzi. She is a literal miracle worker. Her Botox is so conservative and so natural and so effective.
Except in her own photos it does not look natural and conservative, but hard and obvious. No thanks.
Nonsense. She has a national reputation.
NP.
It does not look natural.
People who are into this sort of thing often seem to develop a skewed sense of what normal, natural, healthy aging looks like. This is not it.
And over time, the “light touch” is not enough. It becomes more and more and more. I’ve seen it firsthand with my older siblings. Even my mother, who does not get work done but lives near them, accepts it as “natural looking” because she’s seen it slowly morph over time. I didn’t see them for 3 years (back when they truly did get light Botox) and, holy sh!t. Their work is completely unnatural.
You just keep telling yourself that. I’m sure they look great. The science is there, why not use it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do yourself a favor. Go to Elizabeth Tanzi. She is a literal miracle worker. Her Botox is so conservative and so natural and so effective.
Except in her own photos it does not look natural and conservative, but hard and obvious. No thanks.
Nonsense. She has a national reputation.
NP.
It does not look natural.
People who are into this sort of thing often seem to develop a skewed sense of what normal, natural, healthy aging looks like. This is not it.
And over time, the “light touch” is not enough. It becomes more and more and more. I’ve seen it firsthand with my older siblings. Even my mother, who does not get work done but lives near them, accepts it as “natural looking” because she’s seen it slowly morph over time. I didn’t see them for 3 years (back when they truly did get light Botox) and, holy sh!t. Their work is completely unnatural.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Botox. Don’t even think about it. You will not regret it. It’s not that expensive. Just do the 11’s and brow area do not let them talk you into doing additional areas (eyes, chin blah blah). I do minimal units (20) and the affect is significant.
Leave it to DCUM to say $300 four times a year isn't that expensive!
This is not a lot of money, sorry to tell you. Heck, that's what a good cut and color costs you! We're not talking about a 30 something woman here with small children, at the start of her career or staying at home. This is a woman entering, or in her peak earning years. Frownies are not going to move the dial on anyone over 40, I do wish people would stop pushing that nonsense. Same goes with "face yoga"![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do yourself a favor. Go to Elizabeth Tanzi. She is a literal miracle worker. Her Botox is so conservative and so natural and so effective.
Except in her own photos it does not look natural and conservative, but hard and obvious. No thanks.
Nonsense. She has a national reputation.
NP.
It does not look natural.
People who are into this sort of thing often seem to develop a skewed sense of what normal, natural, healthy aging looks like. This is not it.
And over time, the “light touch” is not enough. It becomes more and more and more. I’ve seen it firsthand with my older siblings. Even my mother, who does not get work done but lives near them, accepts it as “natural looking” because she’s seen it slowly morph over time. I didn’t see them for 3 years (back when they truly did get light Botox) and, holy sh!t. Their work is completely unnatural.
You just keep telling yourself that. I’m sure they look great. The science is there, why not use it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sure I want to go down the road of doing Botox. Does anything else help reduce 11s? Can I train myself to relax the muscle via meditation?
Why are you opposed to botox? And don't say because it's a toxin. Basically what I'm saying is - Botox or Dysport or Xeomin etc, are your only option. Don't waste your time and money on anything else.
Op here. No deep opposition, just hesitant for reasons of cost, hassle, and that I’ve gotten into my late 40s without doing it (and generally am happy with how I look) so not sure I shouldn’t just accept this as normal aging. I’m starting to consider it though…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do yourself a favor. Go to Elizabeth Tanzi. She is a literal miracle worker. Her Botox is so conservative and so natural and so effective.
Except in her own photos it does not look natural and conservative, but hard and obvious. No thanks.
Nonsense. She has a national reputation.
NP.
It does not look natural.
People who are into this sort of thing often seem to develop a skewed sense of what normal, natural, healthy aging looks like. This is not it.
And over time, the “light touch” is not enough. It becomes more and more and more. I’ve seen it firsthand with my older siblings. Even my mother, who does not get work done but lives near them, accepts it as “natural looking” because she’s seen it slowly morph over time. I didn’t see them for 3 years (back when they truly did get light Botox) and, holy sh!t. Their work is completely unnatural.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Botox. Don’t even think about it. You will not regret it. It’s not that expensive. Just do the 11’s and brow area do not let them talk you into doing additional areas (eyes, chin blah blah). I do minimal units (20) and the affect is significant.
Leave it to DCUM to say $300 four times a year isn't that expensive!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do yourself a favor. Go to Elizabeth Tanzi. She is a literal miracle worker. Her Botox is so conservative and so natural and so effective.
Except in her own photos it does not look natural and conservative, but hard and obvious. No thanks.
Nonsense. She has a national reputation.
NP.
It does not look natural.
People who are into this sort of thing often seem to develop a skewed sense of what normal, natural, healthy aging looks like. This is not it.
And over time, the “light touch” is not enough. It becomes more and more and more. I’ve seen it firsthand with my older siblings. Even my mother, who does not get work done but lives near them, accepts it as “natural looking” because she’s seen it slowly morph over time. I didn’t see them for 3 years (back when they truly did get light Botox) and, holy sh!t. Their work is completely unnatural.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do yourself a favor. Go to Elizabeth Tanzi. She is a literal miracle worker. Her Botox is so conservative and so natural and so effective.
Except in her own photos it does not look natural and conservative, but hard and obvious. No thanks.
Nonsense. She has a national reputation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You could try frownies. I am a side sleeper which makes my 11s look worse in the morning, but the lines have disappeared since I started wearing frownies at night.
Best option and shockingly effective. The tech is beyond basic. You can probably make DIY frownies at home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do Botox. Light touch. It'll even improve your mood.
Can't seem to find anyone who has an actual light touch, they either have different aesthetic preferences or only care about $$$.
Really? I only do 12-15 units, depending (not in DC, though).
Yes, DC is so expensive most costly treatments tend to be pushed hard.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Botox. Don’t even think about it. You will not regret it. It’s not that expensive. Just do the 11’s and brow area do not let them talk you into doing additional areas (eyes, chin blah blah). I do minimal units (20) and the affect is significant.
Leave it to DCUM to say $300 four times a year isn't that expensive!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do yourself a favor. Go to Elizabeth Tanzi. She is a literal miracle worker. Her Botox is so conservative and so natural and so effective.
Except in her own photos it does not look natural and conservative, but hard and obvious. No thanks.