Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:dcu13 wrote:Many have shared a feeling that the better rec teams would easily beat the lower travel teams.
Honest question - why don't the kids on those rec teams switch to travel?
$ for many families and commitment to other endeavors… I have had many kids play travel and switch to SFL because of poor coaching in travel, level of commitment from the clubs toward b,c and d teams. SFL used to be much better as well but over the last few years the level of commitment from SFL has diminished (used to provide end of the season tournaments). Hopefully, NCSL will reintroduce some of the end of the season tournaments. I have coached various team for 10 plus years in SFL and there are some that could definitely hand with 2nd team travel and some 1st depending on the club.
Our org started sending our SFL teams to All star tournaments instead of picking all star teams since there is no SFL tournament any longer. The fall Herndon All Star tournament is decent but was a little disorganized last year, Fairfax Police spring tournament is good, heard from a Chantilly coach that the spring Valor tournament was terrible. NVSC has a fall tournament as well but no direct experience.
Does anyone have information on NCSL taking over SFL? It is supposed to happen for this Spring season.
Anonymous wrote:dcu13 wrote:Many have shared a feeling that the better rec teams would easily beat the lower travel teams.
Honest question - why don't the kids on those rec teams switch to travel?
$ for many families and commitment to other endeavors… I have had many kids play travel and switch to SFL because of poor coaching in travel, level of commitment from the clubs toward b,c and d teams. SFL used to be much better as well but over the last few years the level of commitment from SFL has diminished (used to provide end of the season tournaments). Hopefully, NCSL will reintroduce some of the end of the season tournaments. I have coached various team for 10 plus years in SFL and there are some that could definitely hand with 2nd team travel and some 1st depending on the club.
dcu13 wrote:Many have shared a feeling that the better rec teams would easily beat the lower travel teams.
Honest question - why don't the kids on those rec teams switch to travel?
Anonymous wrote:Right, its all about the money of course.
Anyone who pays attention knows there are many great rec teams in this area full of kids who can't afford or don't want to pay 3k to play soccer.
There are some very delusional parents who think their kid making the fifth travel team at their club means something.
Anonymous wrote:My son is playing his second season of SFL this fall after playing travel with a local club for the previous two seasons. Honestly, I did not see much drop off with the more competitive teams we faced (Herndon, Springfield, Sterling particularly) and I’m pretty sure our SFL team would pummel our old travel team. There were too many kids on that travel team who didn’t belong but could pay their way on. I think travel prices out many families which is a shame. The reasons we left travel were:
-too much money. I think we paid -150 plus a $30 uniform this season for the SFL team.
-my son plays flag football in the fall and wrestles in the winter. That’s not possible if you play travel.
-too much of a commitment with expectation to do all the extra stuff in the off-season for fear of losing your spot on the top team. The travel team we played for allowed us just to play in the spring but as they got larger, that option went away. Ironically, my son would come back after a year of not playing soccer and could hang with the kids who were playing year round and doing all the clinics. He wasn’t the best on the team, but he was a starter. That just reinforced to me that you don’t need to play year round.
-less travel. Most of the clubs are in NOVa, one I DC, and the farthest west is Warrenton.
-less pressure, more fun, the list goes on
Our dad coach doesn’t even have a son on the team, but played and knows his stuff.
I think it would be interesting if they had a system of promotion and relegation. It would be interesting to see how far up the table an SFL team could go.
Anonymous wrote:My son is playing his second season of SFL this fall after playing travel with a local club for the previous two seasons. Honestly, I did not see much drop off with the more competitive teams we faced (Herndon, Springfield, Sterling particularly) and I’m pretty sure our SFL team would pummel our old travel team. There were too many kids on that travel team who didn’t belong but could pay their way on. I think travel prices out many families which is a shame. The reasons we left travel were:
-too much money. I think we paid -150 plus a $30 uniform this season for the SFL team.
-my son plays flag football in the fall and wrestles in the winter. That’s not possible if you play travel.
-too much of a commitment with expectation to do all the extra stuff in the off-season for fear of losing your spot on the top team. The travel team we played for allowed us just to play in the spring but as they got larger, that option went away. Ironically, my son would come back after a year of not playing soccer and could hang with the kids who were playing year round and doing all the clinics. He wasn’t the best on the team, but he was a starter. That just reinforced to me that you don’t need to play year round.
-less travel. Most of the clubs are in NOVa, one I DC, and the farthest west is Warrenton.
-less pressure, more fun, the list goes on
Our dad coach doesn’t even have a son on the team, but played and knows his stuff.
I think it would be interesting if they had a system of promotion and relegation. It would be interesting to see how far up the table an SFL team could go.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't really make sense to me how a rec team that practices 1-2x a week for a short rec season with someone's random dad could be better than kids who have been practicing 3-4 times per week year round (for many years, by high school age) with paid coaches.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't really make sense to me how a rec team that practices 1-2x a week for a short rec season with someone's random dad could be better than kids who have been practicing 3-4 times per week year round (for many years, by high school age) with paid coaches.
I can't speak for all teams, but the dad who coaches our team is an immigrant, and played soccer himself a ton. Most of the kids are the same nationality, and they are a pretty tight knit group who play soccer together often outside of formal practices.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't really make sense to me how a rec team that practices 1-2x a week for a short rec season with someone's random dad could be better than kids who have been practicing 3-4 times per week year round (for many years, by high school age) with paid coaches.
It doesn't really make sense to me how a rec team that practices 1-2x a week for a short rec season with someone's random dad could be better than kids who have been practicing 3-4 times per week year round (for many years, by high school age) with paid coaches.