Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably, lying always looks good background check wise if they have really high aspirations for their lives as adults.
Vijay Chokalingam was cold busted after claiming to be black and absolutely nothing happened. He stayed in medical school until he flunked out.
Well.. He's about as black as any Black out there and people from his land ancestors did endure slavery in the US (Google Indentured/Slave labor from India to the United States). If a recent Nigerian immigrant's kids can qualify for the Black 'quota', why not him?
It is fraud. People hope and expect to have honest doctors.
Spend a few years of your life pursuing a medical malpractice case and you'll find yourself wondering how the heck someone with a documented history of fraud gets to be your husband's physician.
Well.. He was admitted based on his grades, wasn't he? Obviously the school thought he was good enough to become a doctor. To me this is the equivalent of someone crossing the border illegally. Would you consider them to be fraudsters all their life?
Confused about your last sentence.. Did he end up becoming your husband's doctor? I thought he dropped out..
You aren't the least bit confused. You just want to brawl with someone anonymously.
How / Why he was admitted is a related but distinct issue. The guy engaged in fraud and to this day profits from it.
Nobody should have to worry whether or not their doctor is dishonest.
Here is related but distinct anecdote - my accountant is SLOW as molasses. But he has been tested and proven himself to be honest. He will always have my business.
My house cleaners entered the country illegally. I have no issues trusting them with my house keys. You see how this works both ways? When you put artificial walls and someone scales it, not everyone thinks that's wrong. I know I don't and a lot of people I know think that way as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably, lying always looks good background check wise if they have really high aspirations for their lives as adults.
Vijay Chokalingam was cold busted after claiming to be black and absolutely nothing happened. He stayed in medical school until he flunked out.
Well.. He's about as black as any Black out there and people from his land ancestors did endure slavery in the US (Google Indentured/Slave labor from India to the United States). If a recent Nigerian immigrant's kids can qualify for the Black 'quota', why not him?
It is fraud. People hope and expect to have honest doctors.
Spend a few years of your life pursuing a medical malpractice case and you'll find yourself wondering how the heck someone with a documented history of fraud gets to be your husband's physician.
Well.. He was admitted based on his grades, wasn't he? Obviously the school thought he was good enough to become a doctor. To me this is the equivalent of someone crossing the border illegally. Would you consider them to be fraudsters all their life?
Confused about your last sentence.. Did he end up becoming your husband's doctor? I thought he dropped out..
You aren't the least bit confused. You just want to brawl with someone anonymously.
How / Why he was admitted is a related but distinct issue. The guy engaged in fraud and to this day profits from it.
Nobody should have to worry whether or not their doctor is dishonest.
Here is related but distinct anecdote - my accountant is SLOW as molasses. But he has been tested and proven himself to be honest. He will always have my business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably, lying always looks good background check wise if they have really high aspirations for their lives as adults.
Vijay Chokalingam was cold busted after claiming to be black and absolutely nothing happened. He stayed in medical school until he flunked out.
Well.. He's about as black as any Black out there and people from his land ancestors did endure slavery in the US (Google Indentured/Slave labor from India to the United States). If a recent Nigerian immigrant's kids can qualify for the Black 'quota', why not him?
It is fraud. People hope and expect to have honest doctors.
Spend a few years of your life pursuing a medical malpractice case and you'll find yourself wondering how the heck someone with a documented history of fraud gets to be your husband's physician.
Well.. He was admitted based on his grades, wasn't he? Obviously the school thought he was good enough to become a doctor. To me this is the equivalent of someone crossing the border illegally. Would you consider them to be fraudsters all their life?
Confused about your last sentence.. Did he end up becoming your husband's doctor? I thought he dropped out..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably, lying always looks good background check wise if they have really high aspirations for their lives as adults.
Vijay Chokalingam was cold busted after claiming to be black and absolutely nothing happened. He stayed in medical school until he flunked out.
Well.. He's about as black as any Black out there and people from his land ancestors did endure slavery in the US (Google Indentured/Slave labor from India to the United States). If a recent Nigerian immigrant's kids can qualify for the Black 'quota', why not him?
It is fraud. People hope and expect to have honest doctors.
Spend a few years of your life pursuing a medical malpractice case and you'll find yourself wondering how the heck someone with a documented history of fraud gets to be your husband's physician.
I feel vulnerable and nervous at the doctor's office. My son feels very, very vulnerable and nervous. Having to worry whether or not the doctor is fundamentally dishonest is just too much.
I bet none of your doctors are Black. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably, lying always looks good background check wise if they have really high aspirations for their lives as adults.
Vijay Chokalingam was cold busted after claiming to be black and absolutely nothing happened. He stayed in medical school until he flunked out.
Well.. He's about as black as any Black out there and people from his land ancestors did endure slavery in the US (Google Indentured/Slave labor from India to the United States). If a recent Nigerian immigrant's kids can qualify for the Black 'quota', why not him?
It is fraud. People hope and expect to have honest doctors.
Spend a few years of your life pursuing a medical malpractice case and you'll find yourself wondering how the heck someone with a documented history of fraud gets to be your husband's physician.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably, lying always looks good background check wise if they have really high aspirations for their lives as adults.
Vijay Chokalingam was cold busted after claiming to be black and absolutely nothing happened. He stayed in medical school until he flunked out.
Well.. He's about as black as any Black out there and people from his land ancestors did endure slavery in the US (Google Indentured/Slave labor from India to the United States). If a recent Nigerian immigrant's kids can qualify for the Black 'quota', why not him?
It is fraud. People hope and expect to have honest doctors.
Spend a few years of your life pursuing a medical malpractice case and you'll find yourself wondering how the heck someone with a documented history of fraud gets to be your husband's physician.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably, lying always looks good background check wise if they have really high aspirations for their lives as adults.
Vijay Chokalingam was cold busted after claiming to be black and absolutely nothing happened. He stayed in medical school until he flunked out.
Well.. He's about as black as any Black out there and people from his land ancestors did endure slavery in the US (Google Indentured/Slave labor from India to the United States). If a recent Nigerian immigrant's kids can qualify for the Black 'quota', why not him?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With the latest Supreme Court ruling, it looks like there will no longer be an advantage for white kids who lie and claim Hispanic or black.
Hispanic/Latino is the ethnicity question, which is a separate question from race. Many, perhaps even most, Hispanic students in the US check the white box when asked for race. There is no Mestizo option. (The "American Indian or Alaska Native" box pulls up questions asking for federal tribe identification info.) This is entirely the result of federal reporting requirements.
What will happen with the National Hispanic Recognition Program? I have read different things, some suggesting its demise but others saying that yes, of course students should report that academic honor in their applications.
On the one hand, academic awards can be considered. Whether an academic award that is race- or ethnicity-based can be considered seems to run close to the line of considering race. Yet, there it is in the app. Maybe admissions can't track it, but admissions will see it when reading the file.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably, lying always looks good background check wise if they have really high aspirations for their lives as adults.
Vijay Chokalingam was cold busted after claiming to be black and absolutely nothing happened. He stayed in medical school until he flunked out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think 99% of schools will opt out of receiving that data point. Too much risk.
I also think what this guy said about recruiting from different high schools will become a big deal.
I’m happy that colleges might focus more on outreach to diverse high-schools. I teach at a high school that is majority low and middle income. Many students are not incredibly high performing but some students are amazing. They have the whole package - smart, hardworking, nice, gritty and resilient. They do very well with limited resources and guidance. I try to help them as much as I can but they mostly get shut out of the top 30 colleges. They always need a lot of financial aid on top of everything else. They also don’t excel at the SAT. More active outreach from colleges and universities would be helpful. I live in an upscale neighborhood and the differences in resources available to high income kids with educated parents takes my breath away
If they don't excel at the SAT then they're not all that smart.
And no, rich parents can't just test prep their kids into excelling at the SAT.
Just because they said that 30 years ago doesn’t make it true. MIL was a brilliant math teacher who also did math SAT prep. She would only take kids who could get a 650 on their own. The number of those kids she got to an 800 was remarkably high. There is a method and it works. All three of her children (of varying natural abilities) got an 800 math.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think 99% of schools will opt out of receiving that data point. Too much risk.
I also think what this guy said about recruiting from different high schools will become a big deal.
I’m happy that colleges might focus more on outreach to diverse high-schools. I teach at a high school that is majority low and middle income. Many students are not incredibly high performing but some students are amazing. They have the whole package - smart, hardworking, nice, gritty and resilient. They do very well with limited resources and guidance. I try to help them as much as I can but they mostly get shut out of the top 30 colleges. They always need a lot of financial aid on top of everything else. They also don’t excel at the SAT. More active outreach from colleges and universities would be helpful. I live in an upscale neighborhood and the differences in resources available to high income kids with educated parents takes my breath away
If they don't excel at the SAT then they're not all that smart.
And no, rich parents can't just test prep their kids into excelling at the SAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think 99% of schools will opt out of receiving that data point. Too much risk.
I also think what this guy said about recruiting from different high schools will become a big deal.
To clarify, colleges will continue to receive the data. The data that admissions officers see is filtered and will not include the data point (too risky, as you point out).