Anonymous wrote:Nothing or they get promoted.
Government.
Anonymous wrote:They get promoted.
Anonymous wrote:OP, can you give examples of what you mean?
There are attorneys in my (fed govt) office who behave terribly (yelling, nastiness) particularly the litigators. There are no consequences.
There are attorneys throughout the agency who behave inappropriately in other more "mild" ways (microaggressions or straight up aggressions in meetings, particularly towards women and minorities, talking over people, taking credit for their work, dismissing their ideas, etc.) and generally it is ignored. I know of at least two individuals who had something escalated to their management because it was so bad that other staffers felt uncomfortable and said something. I don't know if there was a PIP, but eventually one did leave for another job.
A prior poster said something about how people may not know there are PIPs and that someone is leaving of their own accord due it one. I suspect that is often the case but I am not in management/ HR. But there are also some awful people that stick around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mostly nothing, but we had a guy get fired for delivering ubereats in his government issued vehicle, emblazoned with a huge municipal logo, during the work day.
That's kinda awesome. I'm sure they had to replace the driver's seat because of the indentations from his massive balls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my federal agency, it depends. For terrible non-supervisory employees with diligent supervisors, the formal discipline process can progress to the point of removal after about a year. For employees with leadership who aren't that diligent about getting them out, it can take forever.
For people in positions of leadership where the situation becomes intolerable (multiple EEO complaints, investigations, etc), they are usually pushed out into "retirement" or reassigned into a non-supervisory "senior adviser" position where they sit in a corner and do basically nothing. My colleague jokingly called these reassignments "the land of the lost." These upset me because they're still collecting a big paycheck, don't have to supervise people anymore, and have little to no portfolio. Sounds like a good gig for being terrible.
By terrible I mean a variety of behaviors to include harassment, bullying etc.
Same at my agency. Though we do have one lovely adviser who stood out for stunningly clueless behavior related to diversity and inclusion and is now a big spokesperson for…diversity and inclusion. It is nauseating.
Anonymous wrote:At my federal agency, it depends. For terrible non-supervisory employees with diligent supervisors, the formal discipline process can progress to the point of removal after about a year. For employees with leadership who aren't that diligent about getting them out, it can take forever.
For people in positions of leadership where the situation becomes intolerable (multiple EEO complaints, investigations, etc), they are usually pushed out into "retirement" or reassigned into a non-supervisory "senior adviser" position where they sit in a corner and do basically nothing. My colleague jokingly called these reassignments "the land of the lost." These upset me because they're still collecting a big paycheck, don't have to supervise people anymore, and have little to no portfolio. Sounds like a good gig for being terrible.
By terrible I mean a variety of behaviors to include harassment, bullying etc.
Anonymous wrote:Fed agency - minority or female - nothing. White male - movement towards discipine.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing or they get promoted.
Government.