Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking at bios of McKinsey executives and this is what I mean:
![]()
Listen, I would typically not comment on someone’s appearance because this woman is perfectly lovely. But she looks like … anyone .
She looks like Maura Tierney. She looks lovely.
The aesthetic we’re all describing is very white. And it’s all about the tailoring and the hair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking at bios of McKinsey executives and this is what I mean:
![]()
Listen, I would typically not comment on someone’s appearance because this woman is perfectly lovely. But she looks like … anyone .
Anonymous wrote:Looking at bios of McKinsey executives and this is what I mean:
![]()
Anonymous wrote:I’m rich and I look like crap.
No idea
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking at bios of McKinsey executives and this is what I mean:
![]()
Listen, I would typically not comment on someone’s appearance because this woman is perfectly lovely. But she looks like … anyone .
Anonymous wrote:None of these people look particularly exceptional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You definitely can’t judge based on headshots. “Rich people” in good jobs get hair, makeup and styled for photo shoots. That is not what they look like ordinarily. Also, a lot of people are now using AI headshots. You can’t assume a photo is an accurate reflection of a person.
If you look at pictures from “society” functions (ie, charity events, opening nights, etc) you’ll see that rich people look a little more normal in candid shots.
Looking at pictures from the NY social diary. My observation still holds:
![]()
Anonymous wrote:I’m probably who you’re talking about and the only reason I know that is because people think I’m wealthier than I am. It's not a $300 haircut or tailored everything, its just being attractive and not look like a hooker. That’s it. Wear modest clothing as an attractive person and people think you’re rich.