Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No matter how you slice it, he comes across as scum. Dated an eighteen year old, married her, three children later and he wanted to dump her first. It's not a good look and while I agree with the "she should have had an income" not many women in her position, especially Hollywood, are anything other than arm candy and SAHP. The one millions dollars, I'm sorry to say she was too trusting and not smart enough to renegotiate it early in their marriage. At any rate, he keeps this up, no one will go to see his films. I think the success of his last whatever has gone to his head and I believe he better tread lightly. It's not like it would kill him (net worth over 250 million, not buying the bs court filing) he can well afford to make her go away while protecting his and her relationship with the children. Buy her a suitable house, give her a cash settlement and be done.

She was 18 when they started dating?

She was 30. They married 19 years ago. She's about to turn 50.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No matter how you slice it, he comes across as scum. Dated an eighteen year old, married her, three children later and he wanted to dump her first. It's not a good look and while I agree with the "she should have had an income" not many women in her position, especially Hollywood, are anything other than arm candy and SAHP. The one millions dollars, I'm sorry to say she was too trusting and not smart enough to renegotiate it early in their marriage. At any rate, he keeps this up, no one will go to see his films. I think the success of his last whatever has gone to his head and I believe he better tread lightly. It's not like it would kill him (net worth over 250 million, not buying the bs court filing) he can well afford to make her go away while protecting his and her relationship with the children. Buy her a suitable house, give her a cash settlement and be done.

She was 18 when they started dating?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is showing her true colors. She was always a scheming and conniving gold digger. She's never had a real job. Now she's scheming to get tens of millions of dollars from him because she popped out a couple kids. Trash.

3 kids and she's been with him for 25 years. How does that equal a scheming and conniving gold digger? She must have really been playing the long con (which she apparently devised in her early 20s)

Anonymous wrote:No matter how you slice it, he comes across as scum. Dated an eighteen year old, married her, three children later and he wanted to dump her first. It's not a good look and while I agree with the "she should have had an income" not many women in her position, especially Hollywood, are anything other than arm candy and SAHP. The one millions dollars, I'm sorry to say she was too trusting and not smart enough to renegotiate it early in their marriage. At any rate, he keeps this up, no one will go to see his films. I think the success of his last whatever has gone to his head and I believe he better tread lightly. It's not like it would kill him (net worth over 250 million, not buying the bs court filing) he can well afford to make her go away while protecting his and her relationship with the children. Buy her a suitable house, give her a cash settlement and be done.

Anonymous wrote:Judge could throw out pre nup and then she’d be entitled to 1/2 in California. I would think it would be less risky for him to be more generous with her and just settle dispute.

Anonymous wrote:She is showing her true colors. She was always a scheming and conniving gold digger. She's never had a real job. Now she's scheming to get tens of millions of dollars from him because she popped out a couple kids. Trash.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is showing her true colors. She was always a scheming and conniving gold digger. She's never had a real job. Now she's scheming to get tens of millions of dollars from him because she popped out a couple kids. Trash.

3 kids and she's been with him for 25 years. How does that equal a scheming and conniving gold digger? She must have really been playing the long con (which she apparently devised in her early 20s)

Anonymous wrote:She is showing her true colors. She was always a scheming and conniving gold digger. She's never had a real job. Now she's scheming to get tens of millions of dollars from him because she popped out a couple kids. Trash.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No matter how you slice it, he comes across as scum. Dated an eighteen year old, married her, three children later and he wanted to dump her first. It's not a good look and while I agree with the "she should have had an income" not many women in her position, especially Hollywood, are anything other than arm candy and SAHP. The one millions dollars, I'm sorry to say she was too trusting and not smart enough to renegotiate it early in their marriage. At any rate, he keeps this up, no one will go to see his films. I think the success of his last whatever has gone to his head and I believe he better tread lightly. It's not like it would kill him (net worth over 250 million, not buying the bs court filing) he can well afford to make her go away while protecting his and her relationship with the children. Buy her a suitable house, give her a cash settlement and be done.

This. I think he should give her $20m (so ~5% of his estate) and be done. 18 year marriage and 3 kids. A 5% hit after 18 years is nothing. He'd still be loaded and she could live comfortably and finish raising the kids. He has so much money and earning potential that his position just makes him seem like a jerk.

Anonymous wrote:No matter how you slice it, he comes across as scum. Dated an eighteen year old, married her, three children later and he wanted to dump her first. It's not a good look and while I agree with the "she should have had an income" not many women in her position, especially Hollywood, are anything other than arm candy and SAHP. The one millions dollars, I'm sorry to say she was too trusting and not smart enough to renegotiate it early in their marriage. At any rate, he keeps this up, no one will go to see his films. I think the success of his last whatever has gone to his head and I believe he better tread lightly. It's not like it would kill him (net worth over 250 million, not buying the bs court filing) he can well afford to make her go away while protecting his and her relationship with the children. Buy her a suitable house, give her a cash settlement and be done.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whatever money he’s made in the last 20 years she is entitled to half of it. Also any property acquired.

And vice Vera’s, he’s entitled to half her earnings and property.

Nope.

Only and idiot or someone born in 1960woukd agree to that BS.

No more free rides, get a JOB.

Anonymous wrote:Really hard to feel sorry for someone getting $1m plus $58k/month, however I think after 20 years her housing allocation should be upped. $1m for a house is impossible in that area now, and the kids should have a roughly equivalent home with each parent.

Anonymous wrote:Initially I felt bad for him but his divorce terms are clearly unfair. I get the prenup but at some point the prenup becomes unfair. His wife should be able to
raise the kids in comfort. I think it is crazy she doesn’t at least get the appreciation on properties that she has lived in. He seems controlling-sad that after 20 years of marriage she has almost nothing to show for it.